Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > comp.lang.python > #30653

Re: Slicing iterables in sub-generators without loosing elements

Path csiph.com!usenet.pasdenom.info!gegeweb.org!de-l.enfer-du-nord.net!feeder1.enfer-du-nord.net!feeds.phibee-telecom.net!newsfeed.xs4all.nl!newsfeed6.news.xs4all.nl!xs4all!post.news.xs4all.nl!not-for-mail
Return-Path <python-python-list@m.gmane.org>
X-Original-To python-list@python.org
Delivered-To python-list@mail.python.org
X-Spam-Status OK 0.012
X-Spam-Evidence '*H*': 0.98; '*S*': 0.00; 'python': 0.09; 'lawrence': 0.09; 'received:80.91': 0.09; 'received:80.91.229': 0.09; 'received:gmane.org': 0.09; 'received:list': 0.09; 'terry': 0.09; 'language': 0.14; 'oct': 0.16; 'received:80.91.229.3': 0.16; 'received:plane.gmane.org': 0.16; 'reedy': 0.16; 'subject:sub': 0.16; 'wed,': 0.16; 'wrote:': 0.17; 'jan': 0.18; 'module': 0.19; 'trying': 0.21; 'bit': 0.21; "i've": 0.23; 'least': 0.25; 'header :In-Reply-To:1': 0.25; 'header:User-Agent:1': 0.26; 'am,': 0.27; 'besides': 0.27; 'header:X-Complaints-To:1': 0.28; 'chris': 0.28; 'post': 0.28; 'pile': 0.29; "i'm": 0.29; 'not.': 0.32; 'certain': 0.33; 'to:addr:python-list': 0.33; 'pm,': 0.35; 'add': 0.36; 'received:org': 0.36; 'useful': 0.36; "i'll": 0.36; 'well.': 0.37; 'subject:: ': 0.38; 'mark': 0.38; 'some': 0.38; 'talk': 0.38; 'several': 0.39; 'to:addr:python.org': 0.39; 'subject:-': 0.40; 'header:Received:5': 0.40; 'days': 0.60; 'back': 0.62; 'worth': 0.63; 'more': 0.63; 'become': 0.65; 'bot': 0.84; 'coupled': 0.84; 'humans.': 0.84; 'received:fios.verizon.net': 0.84; 'convinced': 0.93
X-Injected-Via-Gmane http://gmane.org/
To python-list@python.org
From Terry Reedy <tjreedy@udel.edu>
Subject Re: Slicing iterables in sub-generators without loosing elements
Date Tue, 02 Oct 2012 14:59:04 -0400
References <mailman.1636.1348935354.27098.python-list@python.org> <040cf4f0-e6de-45b1-add4-462c02fc2c7f@googlegroups.com> <mailman.1700.1349079470.27098.python-list@python.org> <e895bf8b-514b-4dc2-a43e-50de4f9c3a9e@googlegroups.com> <k4f5h2$cs8$1@ger.gmane.org> <CAPTjJmpAMotuywCEWc46vuXSFd71EjuinbKRGvQeJWo2A1C1nA@mail.gmail.com>
Mime-Version 1.0
Content-Type text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding 7bit
X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host pool-173-75-251-66.phlapa.fios.verizon.net
User-Agent Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:15.0) Gecko/20120824 Thunderbird/15.0
In-Reply-To <CAPTjJmpAMotuywCEWc46vuXSFd71EjuinbKRGvQeJWo2A1C1nA@mail.gmail.com>
X-BeenThere python-list@python.org
X-Mailman-Version 2.1.15
Precedence list
List-Id General discussion list for the Python programming language <python-list.python.org>
List-Unsubscribe <http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-list>, <mailto:python-list-request@python.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive <http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-list/>
List-Post <mailto:python-list@python.org>
List-Help <mailto:python-list-request@python.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe <http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list>, <mailto:python-list-request@python.org?subject=subscribe>
Newsgroups comp.lang.python
Message-ID <mailman.1742.1349204420.27098.python-list@python.org> (permalink)
Lines 24
NNTP-Posting-Host 2001:888:2000:d::a6
X-Trace 1349204420 news.xs4all.nl 6926 [2001:888:2000:d::a6]:37975
X-Complaints-To abuse@xs4all.nl
Xref csiph.com comp.lang.python:30653

Show key headers only | View raw

On 10/2/2012 1:58 PM, Chris Angelico wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 3, 2012 at 2:44 AM, Mark Lawrence <breamoreboy@yahoo.co.uk> wrote:
>> What happened to freedom of speech?  If I want to talk to a bot, I'll talk
>> to a bot.  Besides I'm not convinced it/he/she is a bot.  Plus if you read
>> my post carefully, add in several years experience of Python the language
>> and Python the comedy, you might come to the conclusion that a certain
>> amount of urine extraction was going on :)
>
> Coupled with a bit of bot-seeding, which is always fun.
>
> One of these days I'm going to mail Dihedral a whole pile of Gilbert
> and Sullivan operetta and see if any of it comes back in his posts...
>
> Dihedral might be a bot and might not. I've come to the conclusion
> that it's not worth trying to find out, given that a good bot can
> outdo a lot of humans in useful conversation.

I just read that bots playing Unreal Tournament with an 'act human' 
module seem more human to at least some humans than humans. Perhaps that 
is because humans have to become bot-like to play UT well.

-- 
Terry Jan Reedy

Back to comp.lang.python | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

Slicing iterables in sub-generators without loosing elements Thomas Bach <thbach@students.uni-mainz.de> - 2012-09-29 18:14 +0200
  Re: Slicing iterables in sub-generators without loosing elements Paul Rubin <no.email@nospam.invalid> - 2012-09-29 09:26 -0700
    Re: Slicing iterables in sub-generators without loosing elements Thomas Bach <thbach@students.uni-mainz.de> - 2012-09-29 18:44 +0200
  Re: Slicing iterables in sub-generators without loosing elements 88888 Dihedral <dihedral88888@googlemail.com> - 2012-09-30 17:58 -0700
    Re: Slicing iterables in sub-generators without loosing elements Mark Lawrence <breamoreboy@yahoo.co.uk> - 2012-10-01 09:19 +0100
      Re: Slicing iterables in sub-generators without loosing elements Ramchandra Apte <maniandram01@gmail.com> - 2012-10-02 09:12 -0700
        Re: Slicing iterables in sub-generators without loosing elements Mark Lawrence <breamoreboy@yahoo.co.uk> - 2012-10-02 17:44 +0100
          Re: Slicing iterables in sub-generators without loosing elements Ramchandra Apte <maniandram01@gmail.com> - 2012-10-02 20:21 -0700
          Re: Slicing iterables in sub-generators without loosing elements Ramchandra Apte <maniandram01@gmail.com> - 2012-10-02 20:21 -0700
        Re: Slicing iterables in sub-generators without loosing elements Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2012-10-03 03:58 +1000
          Re: Slicing iterables in sub-generators without loosing elements Steven D'Aprano <steve+comp.lang.python@pearwood.info> - 2012-10-03 00:57 +0000
            Re: Slicing iterables in sub-generators without loosing elements 88888 Dihedral <dihedral88888@googlemail.com> - 2012-10-02 18:11 -0700
              Re: Slicing iterables in sub-generators without loosing elements Steven D'Aprano <steve+comp.lang.python@pearwood.info> - 2012-10-03 01:24 +0000
                Re: Slicing iterables in sub-generators without loosing elements 88888 Dihedral <dihedral88888@googlemail.com> - 2012-10-02 18:42 -0700
        Re: Slicing iterables in sub-generators without loosing elements Mark Lawrence <breamoreboy@yahoo.co.uk> - 2012-10-02 19:35 +0100
        Re: Slicing iterables in sub-generators without loosing elements Terry Reedy <tjreedy@udel.edu> - 2012-10-02 14:59 -0400
      Re: Slicing iterables in sub-generators without loosing elements Ramchandra Apte <maniandram01@gmail.com> - 2012-10-02 09:12 -0700
      Re: Slicing iterables in sub-generators without loosing elements 88888 Dihedral <dihedral88888@googlemail.com> - 2012-10-02 13:54 -0700
      Re: Slicing iterables in sub-generators without loosing elements 88888 Dihedral <dihedral88888@googlemail.com> - 2012-10-02 13:54 -0700
  Re: Slicing iterables in sub-generators without loosing elements 88888 Dihedral <dihedral88888@googlemail.com> - 2012-09-30 17:58 -0700

csiph-web