Re: in search of graceful co-routines

Path	csiph.com!x330-a1.tempe.blueboxinc.net!usenet.pasdenom.info!selfless.tophat.at!newsfeed.xs4all.nl!newsfeed6.news.xs4all.nl!xs4all!post.news.xs4all.nl!not-for-mail
Return-Path	<rosuav@gmail.com>
X-Original-To	python-list@python.org
Delivered-To	python-list@mail.python.org
X-Spam-Status	OK 0.038
X-Spam-Evidence	'H': 0.92; 'S': 0.00; 'wed,': 0.04; 'subject:search': 0.07; 'nicely': 0.09; 'am,': 0.14; 'wrote:': 0.14; 'generators.': 0.16; 'sequence,': 0.16; "hasn't": 0.19; 'code': 0.22; 'header:In-Reply-To:1': 0.22; 'wonder': 0.24; "i'm": 0.26; 'chris': 0.27; 'message-id:@mail.gmail.com': 0.28; 'pattern': 0.31; 'queue': 0.31; 'threads': 0.31; 'separate': 0.31; 'all,': 0.31; 'to:addr:python-list': 0.32; 'actually': 0.34; 'couple': 0.35; 'succeeded': 0.35; 'processing': 0.37; 'two': 0.37; 'received:209.85': 0.37; 'element': 0.38; 'sequence': 0.38; 'received:google.com': 0.38; 'them,': 0.38; 'signal': 0.39; 'provider': 0.39; 'to:addr:python.org': 0.39; 'where': 0.39; 'received:209': 0.39; 'would': 0.40; 'header:Received:5': 0.40; 'might': 0.40; '2011': 0.62; 'consumer': 0.80; 'received:209.85.210.174': 0.84; 'received:mail- iy0-f174.google.com': 0.84
DKIM-Signature	v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=EEra5enlSYxSjuolETnH7qcMecfQ7N63LypXFrfSFvY=; b=KeKHJSRGkZiR6vt30LjRyeWgziejrSYISqTfWK4ONfd87X5sIXZS4YPhakNL53weWe CFN0V+kUy1Jrl5MIQ3e6OWQhrZtSchutwPdnyLiTqIU9qF4BNwVD2hF2nyZRn4b4eF7M YfKUKZwEm0vCmasFc8JDiN4TULuPcJwLbgPzc=
DomainKey-Signature	a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; b=S08LmVTLvqRX39bGIFCMDH6a4b26dACvY8EkRmdfgm2dJEgdM4xv1iFBBoJtWIk1JT sWGcsfuUiAjDIHt5n6fRI9B9tsPRU3XR+mr6BGa6cyIyuxneN2SDsAa3Tb9Bh2gvzu/9 7UQNK8bcfghHN+q07yAPLIT9GdSxv+5ljCnFY=
MIME-Version	1.0
In-Reply-To	<4DD2AA99.3010508@simplistix.co.uk>
References	<4DD2AA99.3010508@simplistix.co.uk>
Date	Wed, 18 May 2011 12:50:09 +1000
Subject	Re: in search of graceful co-routines
From	Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com>
To	python-list@python.org
Content-Type	text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
X-BeenThere	python-list@python.org
X-Mailman-Version	2.1.12
Precedence	list
List-Id	General discussion list for the Python programming language <python-list.python.org>
List-Unsubscribe	<http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-list>, <mailto:python-list-request@python.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive	<http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-list>
List-Post	<mailto:python-list@python.org>
List-Help	<mailto:python-list-request@python.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe	<http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list>, <mailto:python-list-request@python.org?subject=subscribe>
Newsgroups	comp.lang.python
Message-ID	<mailman.1739.1305687011.9059.python-list@python.org> (permalink)
Lines	15
NNTP-Posting-Host	82.94.164.166
X-Trace	1305687011 news.xs4all.nl 49178 [::ffff:82.94.164.166]:44390
X-Complaints-To	abuse@xs4all.nl
Xref	x330-a1.tempe.blueboxinc.net comp.lang.python:5647

Show key headers only | View raw

On Wed, May 18, 2011 at 3:04 AM, Chris Withers <chris@simplistix.co.uk> wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> I'm looking for a graceful pattern for the situation where I have a provider
> of a sequence, the consumer of a sequence and code to moderate the two, and
> where I'd like to consumer to be able to signal to the provider that it
> hasn't succeeded in processing one element in the queue.

I wonder would this work nicely if concepted as a couple of threads
with a Queue between them? Whether or not you actually use threads per
se, or if you just have two separate processing loops and message
passing between them, it might be easier to code that way than as
generators.

Chris Angelico

Back to comp.lang.python | Previous | Next | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

Re: in search of graceful co-routines Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2011-05-18 12:50 +1000

csiph-web