Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > comp.lang.python > #5647 > unrolled thread

Re: in search of graceful co-routines

Started byChris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com>
First post2011-05-18 12:50 +1000
Last post2011-05-18 12:50 +1000
Articles 1 — 1 participant

Back to article view | Back to comp.lang.python

This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.


Contents

  Re: in search of graceful co-routines Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2011-05-18 12:50 +1000

#5647 — Re: in search of graceful co-routines

FromChris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com>
Date2011-05-18 12:50 +1000
SubjectRe: in search of graceful co-routines
Message-ID<mailman.1739.1305687011.9059.python-list@python.org>
On Wed, May 18, 2011 at 3:04 AM, Chris Withers <chris@simplistix.co.uk> wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> I'm looking for a graceful pattern for the situation where I have a provider
> of a sequence, the consumer of a sequence and code to moderate the two, and
> where I'd like to consumer to be able to signal to the provider that it
> hasn't succeeded in processing one element in the queue.

I wonder would this work nicely if concepted as a couple of threads
with a Queue between them? Whether or not you actually use threads per
se, or if you just have two separate processing loops and message
passing between them, it might be easier to code that way than as
generators.

Chris Angelico

[toc] | [standalone]


Back to top | Article view | comp.lang.python


csiph-web