Re: Weighted choices

Path	csiph.com!v102.xanadu-bbs.net!xanadu-bbs.net!feeder.erje.net!eu.feeder.erje.net!xlned.com!feeder7.xlned.com!newsfeed.xs4all.nl!newsfeed3.news.xs4all.nl!xs4all!newsgate.cistron.nl!newsgate.news.xs4all.nl!post.news.xs4all.nl!not-for-mail
Return-Path	<antoon.pardon@rece.vub.ac.be>
X-Original-To	python-list@python.org
Delivered-To	python-list@mail.python.org
X-Spam-Status	OK 0.198
X-Spam-Level	*
X-Spam-Evidence	'H': 0.67; 'S': 0.06; 'received:134': 0.05; 'question.': 0.14; 'fruit': 0.16; 'fruit.': 0.16; 'set,': 0.16; '>>>': 0.22; 'example': 0.22; 'header:User-Agent:1': 0.23; 'choices': 0.24; 'regardless': 0.24; 'header:In-Reply-To:1': 0.27; 'appear': 0.29; 'sets': 0.30; "i'm": 0.30; 'sep': 0.31; '+0200,': 0.36; 'acceptable': 0.36; 'should': 0.36; 'jason': 0.38; 'to:addr :python-list': 0.38; 'to:addr:python.org': 0.39; 'above,': 0.60; 'kind': 0.63; 'pick': 0.64; 'different': 0.65; 'chance': 0.65; 'talking': 0.65; 'dict()': 0.84; 'pardon': 0.84; 'wanting': 0.93; '2013': 0.98
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered	true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result	Ap4EANpzLVKGuA9G/2dsb2JhbABaxiSBMoMaAQV4EQshFg8JAwIBAgFFEwYCAod+vRGIJJAHFoQHA5d1hhiLToMi
Date	Mon, 09 Sep 2013 09:12:05 +0200
From	Antoon Pardon <antoon.pardon@rece.vub.ac.be>
User-Agent	Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux i686; rv:10.0.12) Gecko/20130116 Icedove/10.0.12
MIME-Version	1.0
To	python-list@python.org
Subject	Re: Weighted choices
References	<CANy1k1gHFFgd82P5VZJEEZvWe_kHJvi2r1uqVh3Sr=nFZyazuQ@mail.gmail.com> <522CB887.9090000@rece.vub.ac.be> <kl4q29ta0kn2tnfoju13dg8nni4vjvco80@4ax.com>
In-Reply-To	<kl4q29ta0kn2tnfoju13dg8nni4vjvco80@4ax.com>
Content-Type	text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding	7bit
X-BeenThere	python-list@python.org
X-Mailman-Version	2.1.15
Precedence	list
List-Id	General discussion list for the Python programming language <python-list.python.org>
List-Unsubscribe	<https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-list>, <mailto:python-list-request@python.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive	<http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-list/>
List-Post	<mailto:python-list@python.org>
List-Help	<mailto:python-list-request@python.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe	<https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list>, <mailto:python-list-request@python.org?subject=subscribe>
Newsgroups	comp.lang.python
Message-ID	<mailman.164.1378710734.5461.python-list@python.org> (permalink)
Lines	28
NNTP-Posting-Host	2001:888:2000:d::a6
X-Trace	1378710734 news.xs4all.nl 15919 [2001:888:2000:d::a6]:60072
X-Complaints-To	abuse@xs4all.nl
Xref	csiph.com comp.lang.python:53856

Show key headers only | View raw

Op 09-09-13 02:21, Dennis Lee Bieber schreef:
> On Sun, 08 Sep 2013 19:48:55 +0200, Antoon Pardon
> <antoon.pardon@rece.vub.ac.be> declaimed the following:
> 
>> Op 08-09-13 04:12, Jason Friedman schreef:
>>> choices = dict()
>>> choices["apple"] = 10
>>> choices["pear"] = 20
>>> choices["banana"] = 15
>>> choices["orange"] = 25
>>> choices["kiwi"] = 30
>>>
>>> I want to pick sets of fruit, three in a set, where the chance of
>>> selecting a given fruit is proportional to its weight.  In the example
>>> above, pears should appear twice as often as apples and kiwis should
>>> appear twice as often as bananas.
>>
>> Just a small question. Is a set of three bananas an acceptable outcome?
> 
> 	If we are talking probabilities, regardless of what the weighting is,
> it should be probable (if unlikely) to get three-of-a-kind.

Why should that be? I'm unfamiliar with any kind of imperative that
discourages people from wanting sets with three different kinds of
fruit.

-- 
Antoon Pardon

Back to comp.lang.python | Previous | Next — Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

Re: Weighted choices Antoon Pardon <antoon.pardon@rece.vub.ac.be> - 2013-09-09 09:12 +0200
  Re: Weighted choices Steven D'Aprano <steve@pearwood.info> - 2013-09-09 09:11 +0000
    Re: Weighted choices Antoon Pardon <antoon.pardon@rece.vub.ac.be> - 2013-09-09 12:01 +0200

csiph-web