Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.lang.python > #53856
| Date | 2013-09-09 09:12 +0200 |
|---|---|
| From | Antoon Pardon <antoon.pardon@rece.vub.ac.be> |
| Subject | Re: Weighted choices |
| References | <CANy1k1gHFFgd82P5VZJEEZvWe_kHJvi2r1uqVh3Sr=nFZyazuQ@mail.gmail.com> <522CB887.9090000@rece.vub.ac.be> <kl4q29ta0kn2tnfoju13dg8nni4vjvco80@4ax.com> |
| Newsgroups | comp.lang.python |
| Message-ID | <mailman.164.1378710734.5461.python-list@python.org> (permalink) |
Op 09-09-13 02:21, Dennis Lee Bieber schreef: > On Sun, 08 Sep 2013 19:48:55 +0200, Antoon Pardon > <antoon.pardon@rece.vub.ac.be> declaimed the following: > >> Op 08-09-13 04:12, Jason Friedman schreef: >>> choices = dict() >>> choices["apple"] = 10 >>> choices["pear"] = 20 >>> choices["banana"] = 15 >>> choices["orange"] = 25 >>> choices["kiwi"] = 30 >>> >>> I want to pick sets of fruit, three in a set, where the chance of >>> selecting a given fruit is proportional to its weight. In the example >>> above, pears should appear twice as often as apples and kiwis should >>> appear twice as often as bananas. >> >> Just a small question. Is a set of three bananas an acceptable outcome? > > If we are talking probabilities, regardless of what the weighting is, > it should be probable (if unlikely) to get three-of-a-kind. Why should that be? I'm unfamiliar with any kind of imperative that discourages people from wanting sets with three different kinds of fruit. -- Antoon Pardon
Back to comp.lang.python | Previous | Next — Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Re: Weighted choices Antoon Pardon <antoon.pardon@rece.vub.ac.be> - 2013-09-09 09:12 +0200
Re: Weighted choices Steven D'Aprano <steve@pearwood.info> - 2013-09-09 09:11 +0000
Re: Weighted choices Antoon Pardon <antoon.pardon@rece.vub.ac.be> - 2013-09-09 12:01 +0200
csiph-web