Re: [stdlib-sig] Can imaplib be improved?

Path	csiph.com!fu-berlin.de!uni-berlin.de!not-for-mail
From	Random832 <random832@fastmail.com>
Newsgroups	comp.lang.python
Subject	Re: [stdlib-sig] Can imaplib be improved?
Date	Tue, 29 Mar 2016 13:22:09 -0400
Lines	11
Message-ID	<mailman.163.1459272132.28225.python-list@python.org> (permalink)
References	<1458873222.2158998.559175002.3C7CEAF4@webmail.messagingengine.com>
Mime-Version	1.0
Content-Type	text/plain
Content-Transfer-Encoding	7bit
X-Trace	news.uni-berlin.de XkZlsrf/BERa0N9/Wq5naATKPppz98NBxv59BiQJYT2w==
Return-Path	<random832@fastmail.com>
X-Original-To	python-list@python.org
Delivered-To	python-list@mail.python.org
X-Spam-Status	OK 0.003
X-Spam-Evidence	'H': 0.99; 'S': 0.00; 'subject:: [': 0.03; 'received:internal': 0.09; 'assume': 0.11; 'output': 0.13; 'server,': 0.15; 'thu,': 0.15; '24,': 0.16; 'message- id:@webmail.messagingengine.com': 0.16; 'received:10.202': 0.16; 'received:10.202.2': 0.16; 'received:66.111': 0.16; 'received:66.111.4': 0.16; 'received:io': 0.16; 'received:messagingengine.com': 0.16; 'received:psf.io': 0.16; 'subject:sig': 0.16; 'thoughts?': 0.16; 'wrote:': 0.16; 'subject:] ': 0.19; 'posted': 0.21; 'header:In-Reply-To:1': 0.24; 'wondering': 0.25; 'handling': 0.27; 'mostly': 0.27; "i'd": 0.31; 'everyone': 0.31; 'anyone': 0.32; 'options': 0.33; 'list': 0.34; 'email addr:python.org': 0.36; 'to:addr:python-list': 0.36; 'subject:?': 0.36; 'received:10': 0.37; 'received:66': 0.38; 'data': 0.39; 'format': 0.39; 'subject:-': 0.39; 'to:addr:python.org': 0.40; 'ever': 0.60; 'header:Message-Id:1': 0.61; 'provide': 0.61; 'mar': 0.65; 'dead.': 0.84
DKIM-Signature	v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=fastmail.com; h= content-transfer-encoding:content-type:date:from:in-reply-to :message-id:mime-version:references:subject:to:x-sasl-enc :x-sasl-enc; s=mesmtp; bh=lFSiVwJ4o1VBlBQpHCmM6exLRo8=; b=P8YUvC md91anrBxAFlIi5NV7VLZXjg7xeRqbQbo0OTx/FuoszSmMzGSJ6G4V65MvGgAOKT aQ4myLo0upJTfHeaR/i/H09qQUv6gHzRsj2W0YyQ+khig3NYEswDPtyRsSWqeZ9S G+NzmVDya8CFKIefmQmzUIh8MS/dI4NnkV+Bg=
DKIM-Signature	v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=content-transfer-encoding:content-type :date:from:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version:references :subject:to:x-sasl-enc:x-sasl-enc; s=smtpout; bh=lFSiVwJ4o1VBlBQ pHCmM6exLRo8=; b=PI1dXTpdVhQR8FU2VakcJ+kAX2iqRPz9Y6e3VSlZEs+L7Yz 2EQzYN5mSlQ+iBiQfEKjaSfKForEZyXg7xEPntS0USfEVDyANrhEiup+NnjkQg3o zhlVH07xwtJGOaSXUfAFxOs82ibMOVTElQCVSukxCB/XLtEog+VgeTDmKgFU=
X-Sasl-Enc	EYqBsutOHiDNWJS77YINmbuUcgJoMujER6hRpk/FwW9P 1459272129
X-Mailer	MessagingEngine.com Webmail Interface - ajax-e7e8c9db
In-Reply-To	<1458873222.2158998.559175002.3C7CEAF4@webmail.messagingengine.com>
X-BeenThere	python-list@python.org
X-Mailman-Version	2.1.21
Precedence	list
List-Id	General discussion list for the Python programming language <python-list.python.org>
List-Unsubscribe	<https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-list>, <mailto:python-list-request@python.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive	<http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-list/>
List-Post	<mailto:python-list@python.org>
List-Help	<mailto:python-list-request@python.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe	<https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list>, <mailto:python-list-request@python.org?subject=subscribe>
Xref	csiph.com comp.lang.python:105995

Show key headers only | View raw

I'd posted this to stdlib-sig@python.org without realizing that that
list is mostly dead.

On Thu, Mar 24, 2016, at 22:33, Random832 wrote:
> I assume that everyone who has ever used imaplib is familiar with how
> painful its output format is to deal with. I am wondering if anyone else
> has any ideas on ways it can be extended in a backward-compatible way to
> provide options for better parsing, handling unilateral data from the
> server, processing data as it comes in, etc.

Anyone have any thoughts?

Back to comp.lang.python | Previous | Next — Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

Re: [stdlib-sig] Can imaplib be improved? Random832 <random832@fastmail.com> - 2016-03-29 13:22 -0400
  Re: [stdlib-sig] Can imaplib be improved? Grant Edwards <invalid@invalid.invalid> - 2016-03-29 18:45 +0000
    Re: [stdlib-sig] Can imaplib be improved? Random832 <random832@fastmail.com> - 2016-03-29 14:55 -0400

csiph-web