Re: [stdlib-sig] Can imaplib be improved?

From	Random832 <random832@fastmail.com>
Newsgroups	comp.lang.python
Subject	Re: [stdlib-sig] Can imaplib be improved?
Date	2016-03-29 13:22 -0400
Message-ID	<mailman.163.1459272132.28225.python-list@python.org> (permalink)
References	<1458873222.2158998.559175002.3C7CEAF4@webmail.messagingengine.com>

Show all headers | View raw

I'd posted this to stdlib-sig@python.org without realizing that that
list is mostly dead.

On Thu, Mar 24, 2016, at 22:33, Random832 wrote:
> I assume that everyone who has ever used imaplib is familiar with how
> painful its output format is to deal with. I am wondering if anyone else
> has any ideas on ways it can be extended in a backward-compatible way to
> provide options for better parsing, handling unilateral data from the
> server, processing data as it comes in, etc.

Anyone have any thoughts?

Back to comp.lang.python | Previous | Next — Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

Re: [stdlib-sig] Can imaplib be improved? Random832 <random832@fastmail.com> - 2016-03-29 13:22 -0400
  Re: [stdlib-sig] Can imaplib be improved? Grant Edwards <invalid@invalid.invalid> - 2016-03-29 18:45 +0000
    Re: [stdlib-sig] Can imaplib be improved? Random832 <random832@fastmail.com> - 2016-03-29 14:55 -0400

csiph-web