Re: JIT compilers for Python, what is the latest news?

Path	csiph.com!v102.xanadu-bbs.net!xanadu-bbs.net!feeder.erje.net!eu.feeder.erje.net!xlned.com!feeder7.xlned.com!news2.euro.net!newsgate.cistron.nl!newsgate.news.xs4all.nl!post.news.xs4all.nl!not-for-mail
Return-Path	<john_ladasky@sbcglobal.net>
X-Original-To	python-list@python.org
Delivered-To	python-list@mail.python.org
X-Spam-Status	OK 0.007
X-Spam-Evidence	'H': 0.99; 'S': 0.00; 'subject:Python': 0.06; 'arrays': 0.09; 'assumed': 0.09; 'bytes,': 0.09; 'friday,': 0.09; 'implemented.': 0.09; 'to:addr:comp.lang.python': 0.09; 'cc:addr :python-list': 0.11; 'extension,': 0.16; 'integers,': 0.16; 'numpy': 0.16; 'all.': 0.16; 'wrote:': 0.18; 'passing': 0.19; "python's": 0.19; 'cc:addr:python.org': 0.22; 'header:User- Agent:1': 0.23; 'cc:2**0': 0.24; 'pass': 0.26; 'header:In-Reply- To:1': 0.27; "doesn't": 0.30; 'post.': 0.31; 'subject:what': 0.31; 'class': 0.32; 'subject:the': 0.34; 'received:209.85': 0.35; 'case,': 0.35; 'received:google.com': 0.35; 'doing': 0.36; 'subject:?': 0.36; 'received:209': 0.37; 'performance': 0.37; 'expected': 0.38; 'fact': 0.38; 'how': 0.40; 'even': 0.60; 'ian': 0.60; 'improved': 0.60; 'compiling': 0.84; 'subject:latest': 0.84; '2013': 0.98
X-Received	by 10.50.5.197 with SMTP id u5mr494510igu.0.1365185608215; Fri, 05 Apr 2013 11:13:28 -0700 (PDT)
Newsgroups	comp.lang.python
Date	Fri, 5 Apr 2013 11:13:27 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To	<mailman.151.1365183190.3114.python-list@python.org>
Complaints-To	groups-abuse@google.com
Injection-Info	glegroupsg2000goo.googlegroups.com; posting-host=99.100.180.25; posting-account=aVGMWgkAAAB6mGKt34gyuFhFeGnfZNcf
References	<6ac24546-6cc6-4a01-9fa6-3b52d64484e3@googlegroups.com> <mailman.125.1365150463.3114.python-list@python.org> <590d71e1-5f78-475e-a5bc-8210694a7616@googlegroups.com> <mailman.151.1365183190.3114.python-list@python.org>
User-Agent	G2/1.0
X-Google-Web-Client	true
X-Google-IP	99.100.180.25
MIME-Version	1.0
Subject	Re: JIT compilers for Python, what is the latest news?
From	John Ladasky <john_ladasky@sbcglobal.net>
To	comp.lang.python@googlegroups.com
Content-Type	text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Cc	Python <python-list@python.org>
X-BeenThere	python-list@python.org
X-Mailman-Version	2.1.15
Precedence	list
List-Id	General discussion list for the Python programming language <python-list.python.org>
List-Unsubscribe	<http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-list>, <mailto:python-list-request@python.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive	<http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-list/>
List-Post	<mailto:python-list@python.org>
List-Help	<mailto:python-list-request@python.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe	<http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list>, <mailto:python-list-request@python.org?subject=subscribe>
Message-ID	<mailman.152.1365186276.3114.python-list@python.org> (permalink)
Lines	8
NNTP-Posting-Host	2001:888:2000:d::a6
X-Trace	1365186276 news.xs4all.nl 6965 [2001:888:2000:d::a6]:59555
X-Complaints-To	abuse@xs4all.nl
Xref	csiph.com comp.lang.python:42843

Show key headers only | View raw

On Friday, April 5, 2013 10:32:21 AM UTC-7, Ian wrote:

> That doesn't seem to follow from your original post.  Because Numpy is
> a C extension, its performance would not be improved by psyco at all.

What about the fact that Numpy accommodates Python's dynamic typing?  You can pass arrays of integers, floats, bytes, or even PyObjects.  I don't know exactly how all that is implemented.  

In my case, I was always passing floats.  So what I assumed that psyco was doing for me was compiling a neural network class that always expected floats.

Thread

JIT compilers for Python, what is the latest news? John Ladasky <john_ladasky@sbcglobal.net> - 2013-04-04 19:29 -0700
  Re: JIT compilers for Python, what is the latest news? MRAB <python@mrabarnett.plus.com> - 2013-04-05 03:39 +0100
    Re: JIT compilers for Python, what is the latest news? John Ladasky <john_ladasky@sbcglobal.net> - 2013-04-05 01:34 -0700
      Re: JIT compilers for Python, what is the latest news? Devin Jeanpierre <jeanpierreda@gmail.com> - 2013-04-05 14:37 -0400
      Re: JIT compilers for Python, what is the latest news? Joshua Landau <joshua.landau.ws@gmail.com> - 2013-04-06 11:23 +0100
    Re: JIT compilers for Python, what is the latest news? John Ladasky <john_ladasky@sbcglobal.net> - 2013-04-05 01:34 -0700
  Re: JIT compilers for Python, what is the latest news? Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2013-04-05 19:27 +1100
    Re: JIT compilers for Python, what is the latest news? John Ladasky <john_ladasky@sbcglobal.net> - 2013-04-05 01:39 -0700
      Re: JIT compilers for Python, what is the latest news? Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2013-04-05 19:49 +1100
      Re: JIT compilers for Python, what is the latest news? Ian Kelly <ian.g.kelly@gmail.com> - 2013-04-05 11:32 -0600
        Re: JIT compilers for Python, what is the latest news? John Ladasky <john_ladasky@sbcglobal.net> - 2013-04-05 11:13 -0700
          Re: JIT compilers for Python, what is the latest news? Ian Kelly <ian.g.kelly@gmail.com> - 2013-04-05 13:05 -0600
        Re: JIT compilers for Python, what is the latest news? John Ladasky <john_ladasky@sbcglobal.net> - 2013-04-05 11:13 -0700
      Re: JIT compilers for Python, what is the latest news? Robert Kern <robert.kern@gmail.com> - 2013-04-05 10:46 +0100
    Re: JIT compilers for Python, what is the latest news? John Ladasky <john_ladasky@sbcglobal.net> - 2013-04-05 01:39 -0700
      Re: JIT compilers for Python, what is the latest news? ptb <petertbrady@gmail.com> - 2013-04-05 05:18 -0700
  Re: JIT compilers for Python, what is the latest news? Ian Foote <ian@feete.org> - 2013-04-05 13:50 +0100
  Re: JIT compilers for Python, what is the latest news? Joshua Landau <joshua.landau.ws@gmail.com> - 2013-04-06 11:27 +0100
  Re: JIT compilers for Python, what is the latest news? rusi <rustompmody@gmail.com> - 2013-04-06 08:45 -0700
  Re: JIT compilers for Python, what is the latest news? Stefan Behnel <stefan_ml@behnel.de> - 2013-04-06 21:41 +0200

csiph-web