Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.lang.python > #11712
| X-FeedAbuse | http://nntpfeed.proxad.net/abuse.pl feeded by 88.191.16.109 |
|---|---|
| Path | csiph.com!x330-a1.tempe.blueboxinc.net!usenet.pasdenom.info!gegeweb.42!gegeweb.eu!nntpfeed.proxad.net!nospam.fr.eu.org!usenet-fr.net!de-l.enfer-du-nord.net!feeder1.enfer-du-nord.net!feeds.phibee-telecom.net!newsfeed.xs4all.nl!newsfeed6.news.xs4all.nl!xs4all!post.news.xs4all.nl!not-for-mail |
| Return-Path | <ethan@stoneleaf.us> |
| X-Original-To | python-list@python.org |
| Delivered-To | python-list@mail.python.org |
| X-Spam-Status | OK 0.001 |
| X-Spam-Evidence | '*H*': 1.00; '*S*': 0.00; 'example)': 0.07; 'from:addr:ethan': 0.09; 'from:addr:stoneleaf.us': 0.09; 'from:name:ethan furman': 0.09; 'message-id:@stoneleaf.us': 0.09; 'oh,': 0.09; 'received:gator410.hostgator.com': 0.09; 'trailing': 0.09; '~ethan~': 0.09; 'def': 0.15; '**kwargs):': 0.16; '*args,': 0.16; 'comma': 0.16; 'received:72.11': 0.16; 'received:72.11.125': 0.16; 'received:72.11.125.166': 0.16; 'subject: \n ': 0.16; 'cc:addr:python-list': 0.16; 'wrote:': 0.16; 'cc:no real name:2**0': 0.20; '(like': 0.21; 'discussion': 0.22; 'cc:2**0': 0.22; 'header:In-Reply-To:1': 0.22; 'happen.': 0.23; 'helper': 0.23; 'objects,': 0.23; 'keyword': 0.24; 'function': 0.27; 'lists': 0.28; 'cc:addr:python.org': 0.30; 'arguments.': 0.30; 'subject:?': 0.31; 'values': 0.32; "isn't": 0.33; 'header:User- Agent:1': 0.34; 'conflicts': 0.34; 'object': 0.35; 'using': 0.37; 'put': 0.37; 'but': 0.37; 'something': 0.37; '(not': 0.38; 'think': 0.38; 'subject:: ': 0.39; 'your': 0.61; 'target': 0.61; 'received:websitewelcome.com': 0.64; 'received:184': 0.67; 'subject:one': 0.77; 'subject:value': 0.84 |
| Date | Wed, 17 Aug 2011 12:52:29 -0700 |
| From | Ethan Furman <ethan@stoneleaf.us> |
| User-Agent | Thunderbird 1.5.0.10 (Windows/20070221) |
| MIME-Version | 1.0 |
| To | gc <gc1223@gmail.com> |
| Subject | Re: Syntactic sugar for assignment statements: one value to multiple targets? |
| References | <16ea4848-db0c-489a-968c-ca40700f5806@m5g2000prh.googlegroups.com> |
| In-Reply-To | <16ea4848-db0c-489a-968c-ca40700f5806@m5g2000prh.googlegroups.com> |
| Content-Type | text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed |
| Content-Transfer-Encoding | 7bit |
| X-AntiAbuse | This header was added to track abuse, please include it with any abuse report |
| X-AntiAbuse | Primary Hostname - gator410.hostgator.com |
| X-AntiAbuse | Original Domain - python.org |
| X-AntiAbuse | Originator/Caller UID/GID - [47 12] / [47 12] |
| X-AntiAbuse | Sender Address Domain - stoneleaf.us |
| X-BWhitelist | no |
| X-Source | |
| X-Source-Args | |
| X-Source-Dir | |
| X-Source-Sender | mail.admailinc.com ([192.168.10.136]) [72.11.125.166]:4907 |
| X-Source-Auth | ethan+stoneleaf.us |
| X-Email-Count | 1 |
| X-Source-Cap | dG9idWs7dG9idWs7Z2F0b3I0MTAuaG9zdGdhdG9yLmNvbQ== |
| Cc | python-list@python.org |
| X-BeenThere | python-list@python.org |
| X-Mailman-Version | 2.1.12 |
| Precedence | list |
| List-Id | General discussion list for the Python programming language <python-list.python.org> |
| List-Unsubscribe | <http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-list>, <mailto:python-list-request@python.org?subject=unsubscribe> |
| List-Archive | <http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-list> |
| List-Post | <mailto:python-list@python.org> |
| List-Help | <mailto:python-list-request@python.org?subject=help> |
| List-Subscribe | <http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list>, <mailto:python-list-request@python.org?subject=subscribe> |
| Newsgroups | comp.lang.python |
| Message-ID | <mailman.144.1313609768.27778.python-list@python.org> (permalink) |
| Lines | 24 |
| NNTP-Posting-Host | 2001:888:2000:d::a6 |
| X-Trace | 1313609768 news.xs4all.nl 23870 [2001:888:2000:d::a6]:48510 |
| X-Complaints-To | abuse@xs4all.nl |
| Xref | x330-a1.tempe.blueboxinc.net comp.lang.python:11712 |
Show key headers only | View raw
gc wrote:
> Target lists using comma separation are great, but they don't work
> very well for this task. What I want is something like
>
> a,b,c,d,e = *dict()
This isn't going to happen. From all the discussion so far I think your
best solution is a simple helper function (not tested):
def repeat(count_, object_, *args, **kwargs):
result = []
for _ in range(count_):
result.append(object_(*args, **kwargs))
return result
a, b, c, d, e = repeat(5, dict)
These are each new objects, so depending on the function (like the
random.rand_int example) the values may not be the same.
Oh, and I put the trailing _ on count and object to minimize possible
conflicts with keyword arguments.
~Ethan~
Back to comp.lang.python | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Syntactic sugar for assignment statements: one value to multiple targets? gc <gc1223@gmail.com> - 2011-08-02 18:45 -0700
Re: Syntactic sugar for assignment statements: one value to multiple targets? Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2011-08-03 03:09 +0100
Re: Syntactic sugar for assignment statements: one value to multiple targets? Steven D'Aprano <steve+comp.lang.python@pearwood.info> - 2011-08-03 18:25 +1000
Re: Syntactic sugar for assignment statements: one value to multiple targets? Tim Chase <python.list@tim.thechases.com> - 2011-08-03 06:15 -0500
Re: Syntactic sugar for assignment statements: one value to multiple targets? Tim Chase <python.list@tim.thechases.com> - 2011-08-03 06:25 -0500
Re: Syntactic sugar for assignment statements: one value to multiple targets? gc <gc1223@gmail.com> - 2011-08-16 12:50 -0700
Re: Syntactic sugar for assignment statements: one value to multiple targets? Gregory Ewing <greg.ewing@canterbury.ac.nz> - 2011-08-03 20:29 +1200
Re: Syntactic sugar for assignment statements: one value to multiple targets? "Martin P. Hellwig" <martin.hellwig@gmail.com> - 2011-08-16 21:39 +0100
Re: Syntactic sugar for assignment statements: one value to multiple targets? gc <gc1223@gmail.com> - 2011-08-16 17:14 -0700
Re: Syntactic sugar for assignment statements: one value to multiple targets? MRAB <python@mrabarnett.plus.com> - 2011-08-17 03:11 +0100
Re: Syntactic sugar for assignment statements: one value to multiple targets? Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2011-08-17 08:13 +0100
Re: Syntactic sugar for assignment statements: one value to multiple targets? gc <gc1223@gmail.com> - 2011-08-17 02:26 -0700
Re: Syntactic sugar for assignment statements: one value to multiple targets? Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2011-08-17 10:45 +0100
Re: Syntactic sugar for assignment statements: one value to multiple targets? gc <gc1223@gmail.com> - 2011-08-17 03:33 -0700
Re: Syntactic sugar for assignment statements: one value to multiple targets? Terry Reedy <tjreedy@udel.edu> - 2011-08-17 12:12 -0400
Re: Syntactic sugar for assignment statements: one value to multiple targets? MRAB <python@mrabarnett.plus.com> - 2011-08-17 17:55 +0100
Re: Syntactic sugar for assignment statements: one value to multiple targets? Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2011-08-17 18:25 +0100
Re: Syntactic sugar for assignment statements: one value to multiple targets? "OKB (not okblacke)" <brenNOSPAMbarn@NObrenSPAMbarn.net> - 2011-08-17 19:13 +0000
Re: Syntactic sugar for assignment statements: one value to multiple targets? Zero Piraeus <schesis@gmail.com> - 2011-08-17 16:07 -0400
Re: Syntactic sugar for assignment statements: one value to multiple targets? Ethan Furman <ethan@stoneleaf.us> - 2011-08-17 12:52 -0700
Re: Syntactic sugar for assignment statements: one value to multiple targets? John Pinner <funthyme@gmail.com> - 2011-08-18 02:26 -0700
Re: Syntactic sugar for assignment statements: one value to multiple targets? Roy Smith <roy@panix.com> - 2011-08-18 09:13 -0400
csiph-web