Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.lang.python > #10801
| Date | 2011-08-03 06:25 -0500 |
|---|---|
| From | Tim Chase <python.list@tim.thechases.com> |
| Subject | Re: Syntactic sugar for assignment statements: one value to multiple targets? |
| References | <16ea4848-db0c-489a-968c-ca40700f5806@m5g2000prh.googlegroups.com> <4e39060f$0$29988$c3e8da3$5496439d@news.astraweb.com> <CABEqWMBegkFCJNpuD9CoG0h=Bk9_ZKOUvLD2DRW24UqjvjvA-Q@mail.gmail.com> |
| Newsgroups | comp.lang.python |
| Message-ID | <mailman.1833.1312370748.1164.python-list@python.org> (permalink) |
On 08/03/2011 03:36 AM, Katriel Cohn-Gordon wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 3, 2011 at 9:25 AM, Steven D'Aprano wrote:
>> a, b, c, d, e = [dict() for i in range(5)]
>
> I think this is good code -- if you want five different dicts,
> then you should call dict five times. Otherwise Python will
> magically call your expression more than once, which isn't
> very nice. And what if your datatype constructor has
> side-effects?
If the side-effects are correct behavior (perhaps opening files,
network connections, or even updating a class variable) then
constructor side-effects are just doing what they're supposed to.
E.g. something I use somewhat regularly in my code[*]:
a,b,c,d = (file('file%i.txt', 'w') for i in range(4))
If the side-effects aren't performing the correct behavior, fix
the constructor. :)
-tkc
[*] okay, it's more like
(features,
adjustments,
internet,
) = (file(fname) for fname in (
'features.txt',
'adjustments.txt',
'internet.txt'
)
or even
(features,
adjustments,
internet,
) = (
set(
line.strip().upper()
for line
in file(fname)
if line.strip()
)
for fname in (
'features.txt',
'adjustments.txt',
'internet.txt'
)
to load various set() data from text-files.
Back to comp.lang.python | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Syntactic sugar for assignment statements: one value to multiple targets? gc <gc1223@gmail.com> - 2011-08-02 18:45 -0700
Re: Syntactic sugar for assignment statements: one value to multiple targets? Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2011-08-03 03:09 +0100
Re: Syntactic sugar for assignment statements: one value to multiple targets? Steven D'Aprano <steve+comp.lang.python@pearwood.info> - 2011-08-03 18:25 +1000
Re: Syntactic sugar for assignment statements: one value to multiple targets? Tim Chase <python.list@tim.thechases.com> - 2011-08-03 06:15 -0500
Re: Syntactic sugar for assignment statements: one value to multiple targets? Tim Chase <python.list@tim.thechases.com> - 2011-08-03 06:25 -0500
Re: Syntactic sugar for assignment statements: one value to multiple targets? gc <gc1223@gmail.com> - 2011-08-16 12:50 -0700
Re: Syntactic sugar for assignment statements: one value to multiple targets? Gregory Ewing <greg.ewing@canterbury.ac.nz> - 2011-08-03 20:29 +1200
Re: Syntactic sugar for assignment statements: one value to multiple targets? "Martin P. Hellwig" <martin.hellwig@gmail.com> - 2011-08-16 21:39 +0100
Re: Syntactic sugar for assignment statements: one value to multiple targets? gc <gc1223@gmail.com> - 2011-08-16 17:14 -0700
Re: Syntactic sugar for assignment statements: one value to multiple targets? MRAB <python@mrabarnett.plus.com> - 2011-08-17 03:11 +0100
Re: Syntactic sugar for assignment statements: one value to multiple targets? Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2011-08-17 08:13 +0100
Re: Syntactic sugar for assignment statements: one value to multiple targets? gc <gc1223@gmail.com> - 2011-08-17 02:26 -0700
Re: Syntactic sugar for assignment statements: one value to multiple targets? Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2011-08-17 10:45 +0100
Re: Syntactic sugar for assignment statements: one value to multiple targets? gc <gc1223@gmail.com> - 2011-08-17 03:33 -0700
Re: Syntactic sugar for assignment statements: one value to multiple targets? Terry Reedy <tjreedy@udel.edu> - 2011-08-17 12:12 -0400
Re: Syntactic sugar for assignment statements: one value to multiple targets? MRAB <python@mrabarnett.plus.com> - 2011-08-17 17:55 +0100
Re: Syntactic sugar for assignment statements: one value to multiple targets? Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2011-08-17 18:25 +0100
Re: Syntactic sugar for assignment statements: one value to multiple targets? "OKB (not okblacke)" <brenNOSPAMbarn@NObrenSPAMbarn.net> - 2011-08-17 19:13 +0000
Re: Syntactic sugar for assignment statements: one value to multiple targets? Zero Piraeus <schesis@gmail.com> - 2011-08-17 16:07 -0400
Re: Syntactic sugar for assignment statements: one value to multiple targets? Ethan Furman <ethan@stoneleaf.us> - 2011-08-17 12:52 -0700
Re: Syntactic sugar for assignment statements: one value to multiple targets? John Pinner <funthyme@gmail.com> - 2011-08-18 02:26 -0700
Re: Syntactic sugar for assignment statements: one value to multiple targets? Roy Smith <roy@panix.com> - 2011-08-18 09:13 -0400
csiph-web