Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > comp.lang.python > #38309

Re: Curious to see alternate approach on a search/replace via regex

Date 2013-02-06 14:33 -0800
Subject Re: Curious to see alternate approach on a search/replace via regex
From Demian Brecht <demianbrecht@gmail.com>
Newsgroups comp.lang.python
Message-ID <mailman.1428.1360190018.2939.python-list@python.org> (permalink)

Show all headers | View raw


python -m cProfile [script_name].py

http://docs.python.org/2/library/profile.html#module-cProfile


Demian Brecht
http://demianbrecht.github.com




On 2013-02-06 2:30 PM, "richard_hubbe11" <richard_hubbe11@lavabit.com>
wrote:

>I see that urlparse uses split and not re at all and, in my tests,
>urlparse
>completes in less time. More calls but less time is ok to me.
>
>How did you run the test?
>What produces the function call count?

Back to comp.lang.python | Previous | Next | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

Re: Curious to see alternate approach on a search/replace via regex Demian Brecht <demianbrecht@gmail.com> - 2013-02-06 14:33 -0800

csiph-web