Path: csiph.com!usenet.pasdenom.info!weretis.net!feeder4.news.weretis.net!ecngs!feeder2.ecngs.de!newsfeed.freenet.ag!news2.euro.net!newsgate.cistron.nl!newsgate.news.xs4all.nl!post.news.xs4all.nl!not-for-mail Return-Path: X-Original-To: python-list@python.org Delivered-To: python-list@mail.python.org X-Spam-Status: OK 0.030 X-Spam-Evidence: '*H*': 0.94; '*S*': 0.00; 'tests,': 0.07; 'python': 0.09; 'url:github': 0.09; 'cc:addr:python-list': 0.10; 'subject:search': 0.16; 'wrote:': 0.17; 'produces': 0.22; 'cc:2**0': 0.23; 'split': 0.23; 'url:profile': 0.23; 'cc:addr:python.org': 0.25; 'header:In-Reply-To:1': 0.25; 'header :User-Agent:1': 0.26; 'skip:[ 10': 0.26; 'subject:/': 0.28; 'run': 0.28; 'function': 0.30; 'url:python': 0.32; 'received:google.com': 0.34; 'pm,': 0.35; 'received:209.85.220': 0.35; 'received:209.85': 0.35; 'but': 0.36; 'message-id:@gmail.com': 0.36; 'url:org': 0.36; 'url:library': 0.36; 'charset:us-ascii': 0.36; 'uses': 0.37; 'received:209': 0.37; 'subject:: ': 0.38; 'url:docs': 0.38; 'received:10': 0.38; 'skip:" 10': 0.40; 'more': 0.63; '2:30': 0.84; 'subject:via': 0.84 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=x-received:user-agent:date:subject:from:to:cc:message-id :thread-topic:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=fbnCFhMQEUXu3aTCEkETNHTZE+ou2RfPu1q82wjHHgQ=; b=qBllZcXz7KpzYp/uLTOpXljISrqPGkLV6zAdyfMDZZ0mIuK1YVq4hXahduMwhUzYSA /1Iw5mkWc7hT9WG4kSz3KYUUOVpErMo22EQ7xR05T1LiV1An3hEXfvGtB5tl9OcpElrK Ns2urTEfdeI2hPKnOlplWZrpEJDIWghAfvUlJELS6Umd3b9eE+Yp3ncWqf5F/3mC+Gy6 4677zBgzIONh6m5T5aahqlILWIkKcVghcXyEc0ffOeHMW4S1zNzajhDCwvboPhRGnYi5 9Rf93pSYp5z2XxYv66BSs5TJoc7yKpWCe/Xi5O49g2P2+rZAa0wspQcmV9m7AMop3V5+ yPig== X-Received: by 10.66.83.165 with SMTP id r5mr79520316pay.3.1360190014879; Wed, 06 Feb 2013 14:33:34 -0800 (PST) User-Agent: Microsoft-MacOutlook/14.3.0.121105 Date: Wed, 06 Feb 2013 14:33:23 -0800 Subject: Re: Curious to see alternate approach on a search/replace via regex From: Demian Brecht To: richard_hubbe11 Thread-Topic: Curious to see alternate approach on a search/replace via regex In-Reply-To: <20130206143026.deb87cf33c1243e4b377f430@lavabit.com> Mime-version: 1.0 Content-type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-transfer-encoding: 7bit Cc: "python-list@python.org" X-BeenThere: python-list@python.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: General discussion list for the Python programming language List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Newsgroups: comp.lang.python Message-ID: Lines: 22 NNTP-Posting-Host: 2001:888:2000:d::a6 X-Trace: 1360190018 news.xs4all.nl 6959 [2001:888:2000:d::a6]:46911 X-Complaints-To: abuse@xs4all.nl Xref: csiph.com comp.lang.python:38309 python -m cProfile [script_name].py http://docs.python.org/2/library/profile.html#module-cProfile Demian Brecht http://demianbrecht.github.com On 2013-02-06 2:30 PM, "richard_hubbe11" wrote: >I see that urlparse uses split and not re at all and, in my tests, >urlparse >completes in less time. More calls but less time is ok to me. > >How did you run the test? >What produces the function call count?