Groups > comp.lang.python > #196255

Re: Anonymous email users

Path	csiph.com!fu-berlin.de!uni-berlin.de!not-for-mail
From	dn <PythonList@DancesWithMice.info>
Newsgroups	comp.lang.python
Subject	Re: Anonymous email users
Date	Sat, 15 Jun 2024 10:30:36 +1200
Organization	DWM
Lines	31
Message-ID	<mailman.137.1718404249.2909.python-list@python.org> (permalink)
References	<006901dabea6$4a159d30$de40d790$@gmail.com> <da7d557f-d14e-4041-aa32-ba5d0b4261f1@DancesWithMice.info>
Mime-Version	1.0
Content-Type	text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding	7bit
X-Trace	news.uni-berlin.de fdqdDUl3B+gP2qH82RajeweK9z2WafvyRjhuqJLrs9PA==
Cancel-Lock	sha1:mEZBsHqeek4lqGnLXOYFDaMWdYk= sha256:nbpg1xgPu8knVs9xswU19fb0WqGtiVeci0KNer8yZuI=
Return-Path	<PythonList@DancesWithMice.info>
X-Original-To	python-list@python.org
Delivered-To	python-list@mail.python.org
Authentication-Results	mail.python.org; dkim=pass reason="2048-bit key; unprotected key" header.d=danceswithmice.info header.i=@danceswithmice.info header.b=WEc3YsF1; dkim-adsp=pass; dkim-atps=neutral
X-Spam-Status	OK 0.021
X-Spam-Evidence	'H': 0.96; 'S': 0.00; '(for': 0.05; 'thread': 0.05; '=dn': 0.09; 'bothering': 0.09; 'from:addr:danceswithmice.info': 0.09; 'from:addr:pythonlist': 0.09; 'received:192.168.1.64': 0.09; 'subject:Anonymous': 0.09; 'avi': 0.16; 'gross': 0.16; 'grounds': 0.16; 'hardly': 0.16; 'message-id:@DancesWithMice.info': 0.16; 'popular.': 0.16; 'received:cloud': 0.16; 'received:rangi.cloud': 0.16; 'wrote:': 0.16; 'python': 0.16; 'addresses': 0.19; 'to:addr:python-list': 0.20; 'code': 0.23; 'run': 0.23; 'examples': 0.25; 'cannot': 0.25; 'behavior': 0.26; 'asked': 0.29; 'header:User-Agent:1': 0.30; 'header:Organization:1': 0.31; 'python-list': 0.32; 'regard': 0.32; 'received:192.168.1': 0.32; 'there': 0.33; 'hold': 0.33; 'someone': 0.34; 'header:In-Reply-To:1': 0.34; 'particularly': 0.35; "it's": 0.37; 'others': 0.37; 'received:192.168': 0.37; 'least': 0.39; 'necessary': 0.39; 'valid': 0.39; 'use': 0.39; 'week': 0.61; 'shall': 0.61; 'email': 0.63; 'between': 0.63; 'personal': 0.64; 'thus': 0.64; 'similar': 0.65; 'order': 0.69; 'ones,': 0.69; 'interesting': 0.71; '....': 0.76; 'reply': 0.77; 'reasons': 0.84; 'opinion:': 0.84; 'questioned': 0.84; 'thus,': 0.84; 'skip:q 30': 0.91
DKIM-Filter	OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 vps.rangi.cloud 340EF3175
DKIM-Signature	v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=danceswithmice.info; s=staff; t=1718404240; bh=dBm7pkShVOmU4KsmFGfkWqFxftbVbVkaV4lMwc4/6B4=; h=Date:From:Subject:To:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=WEc3YsF1IGfqebxXv5NK8+Zdd++/YwTigNxVC37rWC7vdYesxTrEaT90QNydCiHVl h4qOU6GEK/gWFCoM9fhvDDsckJpTO59ECbT5Rlh2JGJ1xtn9Xfi6fINjP5CH6Qt+Q6 5IeJ2jOE/E1VloV7nKoOoZiYCXVbGFQrGH6hR5w6BJHwCGVq1Q7PSttzxCViyrpysC voBa1kQc2k1vW6j21aRT7RP26/go0uUGz3g43ff9VABJcZYqe9egGckw5uYXhnJ5ss DrhKSa7ZA/p8qW9rO9ffFeAzG9dmzs99/st6UfqXQq+s7qtsPzMEw8PlL20mf+zLEJ JIDZ9qVGYVi1Q==
User-Agent	Mozilla Thunderbird
Content-Language	en-US
In-Reply-To	<006901dabea6$4a159d30$de40d790$@gmail.com>
X-BeenThere	python-list@python.org
X-Mailman-Version	2.1.39
Precedence	list
List-Id	General discussion list for the Python programming language <python-list.python.org>
List-Unsubscribe	<https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-list>, <mailto:python-list-request@python.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive	<https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-list/>
List-Post	<mailto:python-list@python.org>
List-Help	<mailto:python-list-request@python.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe	<https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list>, <mailto:python-list-request@python.org?subject=subscribe>
X-Mailman-Original-Message-ID	<da7d557f-d14e-4041-aa32-ba5d0b4261f1@DancesWithMice.info>
X-Mailman-Original-References	<006901dabea6$4a159d30$de40d790$@gmail.com>
Xref	csiph.com comp.lang.python:196255

Show key headers only | View raw

On 15/06/24 10:00, AVI GROSS via Python-list wrote:
> I notice that in some recent discussions, we have users who cannot be
> replied to directly as their email addresses are not valid ones, and I
> believe on purpose. Examples in the thread I was going to reply to are:
...

It's an interesting conundrum. There are good reasons and nefarious, for 
such behavior.

Some have questioned my behavior in similar regard - asking why I use 
initials (also used IRL). It is because my first name "David" is/was 
very popular. At a meeting this week there were three of us. Thus, 
"David", "Dave", and "dn" was necessary to distinguish between us.

These mailing-lists all run under the Python Code of Conduct.

This also effects a conundrum. Firstly, that someone abusing others (for 
example) shall be held responsible. Secondly, that in order to hold 
someone responsible, he/she/... must be identifiable.

Personal opinion: if someone is asked a 
question/clarification/sample-code, particularly as a response to their 
own OP, and does not answer; this is at the least rude, and thus 
disrespectful, or at worst grounds for not bothering with them again - 
hardly a 'community' attitude!

-- 
Regards,
=dn

Back to comp.lang.python | Previous | Next — Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

Re: Anonymous email users dn <PythonList@DancesWithMice.info> - 2024-06-15 10:30 +1200
  Re: Anonymous email users Marco Moock <mm+usenet-es@dorfdsl.de> - 2024-06-15 08:02 +0200
    Re: Anonymous email users (Posting On Python-List Prohibited) Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> - 2024-06-15 06:41 +0000
    RE: Anonymous email users <avi.e.gross@gmail.com> - 2024-06-17 11:03 -0400
    Re: Anonymous email users Roel Schroeven <roel@roelschroeven.net> - 2024-06-17 19:29 +0200
    Re: Anonymous email users Grant Edwards <grant.b.edwards@gmail.com> - 2024-06-17 17:07 -0400
    RE: Anonymous email users <avi.e.gross@gmail.com> - 2024-06-17 17:21 -0400
    Re: Anonymous email users dn <PythonList@DancesWithMice.info> - 2024-06-18 11:51 +1200
    Re: Anonymous email users Mats Wichmann <mats@wichmann.us> - 2024-06-18 11:45 -0600
    Re: Anonymous email users Grant Edwards <grant.b.edwards@gmail.com> - 2024-06-18 13:58 -0400

csiph-web