Path: csiph.com!fu-berlin.de!uni-berlin.de!not-for-mail From: dn Newsgroups: comp.lang.python Subject: Re: Anonymous email users Date: Sat, 15 Jun 2024 10:30:36 +1200 Organization: DWM Lines: 31 Message-ID: References: <006901dabea6$4a159d30$de40d790$@gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: news.uni-berlin.de fdqdDUl3B+gP2qH82RajeweK9z2WafvyRjhuqJLrs9PA== Cancel-Lock: sha1:mEZBsHqeek4lqGnLXOYFDaMWdYk= sha256:nbpg1xgPu8knVs9xswU19fb0WqGtiVeci0KNer8yZuI= Return-Path: X-Original-To: python-list@python.org Delivered-To: python-list@mail.python.org Authentication-Results: mail.python.org; dkim=pass reason="2048-bit key; unprotected key" header.d=danceswithmice.info header.i=@danceswithmice.info header.b=WEc3YsF1; dkim-adsp=pass; dkim-atps=neutral X-Spam-Status: OK 0.021 X-Spam-Evidence: '*H*': 0.96; '*S*': 0.00; '(for': 0.05; 'thread': 0.05; '=dn': 0.09; 'bothering': 0.09; 'from:addr:danceswithmice.info': 0.09; 'from:addr:pythonlist': 0.09; 'received:192.168.1.64': 0.09; 'subject:Anonymous': 0.09; 'avi': 0.16; 'gross': 0.16; 'grounds': 0.16; 'hardly': 0.16; 'message-id:@DancesWithMice.info': 0.16; 'popular.': 0.16; 'received:cloud': 0.16; 'received:rangi.cloud': 0.16; 'wrote:': 0.16; 'python': 0.16; 'addresses': 0.19; 'to:addr:python-list': 0.20; 'code': 0.23; 'run': 0.23; 'examples': 0.25; 'cannot': 0.25; 'behavior': 0.26; 'asked': 0.29; 'header:User-Agent:1': 0.30; 'header:Organization:1': 0.31; 'python-list': 0.32; 'regard': 0.32; 'received:192.168.1': 0.32; 'there': 0.33; 'hold': 0.33; 'someone': 0.34; 'header:In-Reply-To:1': 0.34; 'particularly': 0.35; "it's": 0.37; 'others': 0.37; 'received:192.168': 0.37; 'least': 0.39; 'necessary': 0.39; 'valid': 0.39; 'use': 0.39; 'week': 0.61; 'shall': 0.61; 'email': 0.63; 'between': 0.63; 'personal': 0.64; 'thus': 0.64; 'similar': 0.65; 'order': 0.69; 'ones,': 0.69; 'interesting': 0.71; '....': 0.76; 'reply': 0.77; 'reasons': 0.84; 'opinion:': 0.84; 'questioned': 0.84; 'thus,': 0.84; 'skip:q 30': 0.91 DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 vps.rangi.cloud 340EF3175 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=danceswithmice.info; s=staff; t=1718404240; bh=dBm7pkShVOmU4KsmFGfkWqFxftbVbVkaV4lMwc4/6B4=; h=Date:From:Subject:To:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=WEc3YsF1IGfqebxXv5NK8+Zdd++/YwTigNxVC37rWC7vdYesxTrEaT90QNydCiHVl h4qOU6GEK/gWFCoM9fhvDDsckJpTO59ECbT5Rlh2JGJ1xtn9Xfi6fINjP5CH6Qt+Q6 5IeJ2jOE/E1VloV7nKoOoZiYCXVbGFQrGH6hR5w6BJHwCGVq1Q7PSttzxCViyrpysC voBa1kQc2k1vW6j21aRT7RP26/go0uUGz3g43ff9VABJcZYqe9egGckw5uYXhnJ5ss DrhKSa7ZA/p8qW9rO9ffFeAzG9dmzs99/st6UfqXQq+s7qtsPzMEw8PlL20mf+zLEJ JIDZ9qVGYVi1Q== User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird Content-Language: en-US In-Reply-To: <006901dabea6$4a159d30$de40d790$@gmail.com> X-BeenThere: python-list@python.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39 Precedence: list List-Id: General discussion list for the Python programming language List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-Mailman-Original-Message-ID: X-Mailman-Original-References: <006901dabea6$4a159d30$de40d790$@gmail.com> Xref: csiph.com comp.lang.python:196255 On 15/06/24 10:00, AVI GROSS via Python-list wrote: > I notice that in some recent discussions, we have users who cannot be > replied to directly as their email addresses are not valid ones, and I > believe on purpose. Examples in the thread I was going to reply to are: ... It's an interesting conundrum. There are good reasons and nefarious, for such behavior. Some have questioned my behavior in similar regard - asking why I use initials (also used IRL). It is because my first name "David" is/was very popular. At a meeting this week there were three of us. Thus, "David", "Dave", and "dn" was necessary to distinguish between us. These mailing-lists all run under the Python Code of Conduct. This also effects a conundrum. Firstly, that someone abusing others (for example) shall be held responsible. Secondly, that in order to hold someone responsible, he/she/... must be identifiable. Personal opinion: if someone is asked a question/clarification/sample-code, particularly as a response to their own OP, and does not answer; this is at the least rude, and thus disrespectful, or at worst grounds for not bothering with them again - hardly a 'community' attitude! -- Regards, =dn