Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.lang.python > #77162
| Path | csiph.com!v102.xanadu-bbs.net!xanadu-bbs.net!feeder.erje.net!eu.feeder.erje.net!xlned.com!feeder3.xlned.com!newsfeed.xs4all.nl!newsfeed1.news.xs4all.nl!xs4all!post.news.xs4all.nl!not-for-mail |
|---|---|
| Return-Path | <python.list@tim.thechases.com> |
| X-Original-To | python-list@python.org |
| Delivered-To | python-list@mail.python.org |
| X-Spam-Status | OK 0.002 |
| X-Spam-Evidence | '*H*': 1.00; '*S*': 0.00; 'else:': 0.03; 'here?': 0.09; 'slow.': 0.09; 'runs': 0.10; 'cc:addr:python-list': 0.11; 'python': 0.11; 'def': 0.12; '-tkc': 0.16; 'collections': 0.16; 'from:addr:python.list': 0.16; 'from:addr:tim.thechases.com': 0.16; 'from:name:tim chase': 0.16; 'subject:slow': 0.16; 'surprises': 0.16; 'wrote:': 0.18; 'memory': 0.22; 'import': 0.22; 'cc:addr:python.org': 0.22; 'cc:2**0': 0.24; 'pass': 0.26; 'header :In-Reply-To:1': 0.27; 'function': 0.29; 'array': 0.29; "doesn't": 0.30; 'bigger': 0.30; 'waste': 0.30; 'skip:# 10': 0.33; '"the': 0.34; 'returning': 0.36; 'charset:us-ascii': 0.36; 'subject:?': 0.36; 'black': 0.61; 'to:addr:gmail.com': 0.65; 'results': 0.69; 'received:50.22': 0.84; 'subject:over': 0.84 |
| Date | Wed, 27 Aug 2014 16:21:57 -0500 |
| From | Tim Chase <python.list@tim.thechases.com> |
| To | Rodrick Brown <rodrick.brown@gmail.com> |
| Subject | Re: iterating over strings seems to be really slow? |
| In-Reply-To | <CABRP1o-X3wadeNh-7sf7XvEFGAus-QLQ=FTEab3hRT+y2EzyWA@mail.gmail.com> |
| References | <CABRP1o-X3wadeNh-7sf7XvEFGAus-QLQ=FTEab3hRT+y2EzyWA@mail.gmail.com> |
| X-Mailer | Claws Mail 3.8.1 (GTK+ 2.24.10; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) |
| Mime-Version | 1.0 |
| Content-Type | text/plain; charset=US-ASCII |
| Content-Transfer-Encoding | 7bit |
| X-AntiAbuse | This header was added to track abuse, please include it with any abuse report |
| X-AntiAbuse | Primary Hostname - boston.accountservergroup.com |
| X-AntiAbuse | Original Domain - python.org |
| X-AntiAbuse | Originator/Caller UID/GID - [47 12] / [47 12] |
| X-AntiAbuse | Sender Address Domain - tim.thechases.com |
| X-Get-Message-Sender-Via | boston.accountservergroup.com: authenticated_id: tim@thechases.com |
| Cc | "python-list@python.org" <python-list@python.org> |
| X-BeenThere | python-list@python.org |
| X-Mailman-Version | 2.1.15 |
| Precedence | list |
| List-Id | General discussion list for the Python programming language <python-list.python.org> |
| List-Unsubscribe | <https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-list>, <mailto:python-list-request@python.org?subject=unsubscribe> |
| List-Archive | <http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-list/> |
| List-Post | <mailto:python-list@python.org> |
| List-Help | <mailto:python-list-request@python.org?subject=help> |
| List-Subscribe | <https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list>, <mailto:python-list-request@python.org?subject=subscribe> |
| Newsgroups | comp.lang.python |
| Message-ID | <mailman.13525.1409174624.18130.python-list@python.org> (permalink) |
| Lines | 56 |
| NNTP-Posting-Host | 2001:888:2000:d::a6 |
| X-Trace | 1409174624 news.xs4all.nl 2949 [2001:888:2000:d::a6]:42742 |
| X-Complaints-To | abuse@xs4all.nl |
| Xref | csiph.com comp.lang.python:77162 |
Show key headers only | View raw
On 2014-08-27 16:53, Rodrick Brown wrote:
> *I'm confused why the former function runs significantly faster when
> wc1() builds the hash on a single pass and doesn't waste memory of
> returning an array of strings? *
>
> *I would think wc2() to be slower what's going on here? *
>
>
> #!/usr/bin/env python
>
> s = "The black cat jump over the bigger black cat"
>
>
> def wc1():
> word=""
> m={}
> for c in s:
> if c != " ":
> word += c
String-building a character-at-a-time is slow. Also, it doesn't
produce the same results as wc2() does. Check
if wc1() == wc2():
print("Success")
else:
print("doh!")
> def wc2():
> m={}
> for c in s.split():
> if m.has_key(c):
> m[c] += 1
> else:
> m[c] = 1
> return(m)
The thing that surprises me is that using collections.Counter() and
collections.defaultdict(int) are also slower than your wc2():
from collections import defaultdict, Counter
def wc3():
return Counter(s.split())
def wc4():
m = defaultdict(int)
for c in s.split():
m[c] += 1
return m
-tkc
Back to comp.lang.python | Previous | Next | Find similar | Unroll thread
Re: iterating over strings seems to be really slow? Tim Chase <python.list@tim.thechases.com> - 2014-08-27 16:21 -0500
csiph-web