Path: csiph.com!v102.xanadu-bbs.net!xanadu-bbs.net!feeder.erje.net!eu.feeder.erje.net!xlned.com!feeder3.xlned.com!newsfeed.xs4all.nl!newsfeed1.news.xs4all.nl!xs4all!post.news.xs4all.nl!not-for-mail Return-Path: X-Original-To: python-list@python.org Delivered-To: python-list@mail.python.org X-Spam-Status: OK 0.002 X-Spam-Evidence: '*H*': 1.00; '*S*': 0.00; 'else:': 0.03; 'here?': 0.09; 'slow.': 0.09; 'runs': 0.10; 'cc:addr:python-list': 0.11; 'python': 0.11; 'def': 0.12; '-tkc': 0.16; 'collections': 0.16; 'from:addr:python.list': 0.16; 'from:addr:tim.thechases.com': 0.16; 'from:name:tim chase': 0.16; 'subject:slow': 0.16; 'surprises': 0.16; 'wrote:': 0.18; 'memory': 0.22; 'import': 0.22; 'cc:addr:python.org': 0.22; 'cc:2**0': 0.24; 'pass': 0.26; 'header :In-Reply-To:1': 0.27; 'function': 0.29; 'array': 0.29; "doesn't": 0.30; 'bigger': 0.30; 'waste': 0.30; 'skip:# 10': 0.33; '"the': 0.34; 'returning': 0.36; 'charset:us-ascii': 0.36; 'subject:?': 0.36; 'black': 0.61; 'to:addr:gmail.com': 0.65; 'results': 0.69; 'received:50.22': 0.84; 'subject:over': 0.84 Date: Wed, 27 Aug 2014 16:21:57 -0500 From: Tim Chase To: Rodrick Brown Subject: Re: iterating over strings seems to be really slow? In-Reply-To: References: X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.8.1 (GTK+ 2.24.10; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-AntiAbuse: This header was added to track abuse, please include it with any abuse report X-AntiAbuse: Primary Hostname - boston.accountservergroup.com X-AntiAbuse: Original Domain - python.org X-AntiAbuse: Originator/Caller UID/GID - [47 12] / [47 12] X-AntiAbuse: Sender Address Domain - tim.thechases.com X-Get-Message-Sender-Via: boston.accountservergroup.com: authenticated_id: tim@thechases.com Cc: "python-list@python.org" X-BeenThere: python-list@python.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: General discussion list for the Python programming language List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Newsgroups: comp.lang.python Message-ID: Lines: 56 NNTP-Posting-Host: 2001:888:2000:d::a6 X-Trace: 1409174624 news.xs4all.nl 2949 [2001:888:2000:d::a6]:42742 X-Complaints-To: abuse@xs4all.nl Xref: csiph.com comp.lang.python:77162 On 2014-08-27 16:53, Rodrick Brown wrote: > *I'm confused why the former function runs significantly faster when > wc1() builds the hash on a single pass and doesn't waste memory of > returning an array of strings? * > > *I would think wc2() to be slower what's going on here? * > > > #!/usr/bin/env python > > s = "The black cat jump over the bigger black cat" > > > def wc1(): > word="" > m={} > for c in s: > if c != " ": > word += c String-building a character-at-a-time is slow. Also, it doesn't produce the same results as wc2() does. Check if wc1() == wc2(): print("Success") else: print("doh!") > def wc2(): > m={} > for c in s.split(): > if m.has_key(c): > m[c] += 1 > else: > m[c] = 1 > return(m) The thing that surprises me is that using collections.Counter() and collections.defaultdict(int) are also slower than your wc2(): from collections import defaultdict, Counter def wc3(): return Counter(s.split()) def wc4(): m = defaultdict(int) for c in s.split(): m[c] += 1 return m -tkc