Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > comp.lang.python > #76825

Re: Python vs C++

Show key headers only | View raw

On 08/22/2014 02:06 PM, Marko Rauhamaa wrote:
> I tend to think the opposite: C++ barely has a niche left. I definitely
> wouldn't want to use C++ very far from its (very narrow) sweet spot.

I agree that it's niche is narrowing.  But it's still pretty wide and
widely used.  Many adobe products are C++, for example.  OpenOffice and
LibreOffice is C++.  You could argue that's because they are old
projects and were started in C++. But honestly if you were
reimplementing OpenOffice today what would you choose?  Python would be
appropriate for certain aspects of OO, such as parts of the UI, macros,
filters, etc.  I certainly wouldn't want to use Java (contrary to
popular belief OO is not written in Java; it's definitely C++).  Go is
quite young but promising except that unicode is all UTF-8 byte strings,
so string operations are going to be a bit slow.  C# never lived up to
its promise as the next app development language, even on Windows.  So
at this moment I'd still do it in C++ I think.  Apple chose to use C++
to build clang and llvm in, rather than C.

> My disillusionment with C++ came from the language's inability to
> represent callbacks. C can do it (void *), C# can do it (delegates),
> Java can do it (anonymous inner classes), Python can do it (methods),
> Scheme can do it (closures).

C++ can do it quite well, actually.  Maybe not quite as nicely as
Python.  But boost and libsigc++ both offer nice, type-safe ways to
implement signals and slots.  You can pass references to a callback
around in an easy, safe way.

> Qt needs callbacks ("signals" IIRC). It doesn't use C++ to express them.
> It uses a fricking metacompiler for them.

This is only partially true.  The actual, original, .cpp files with Qt
macros in them compile directly on the C++ compiler.  moc runs on the .h
file to generate some supporting code to help with event dispatching.
There's no such thing as Qt C++.  It's all standard C++, with macros to
help when defining things such as signals.

Macros were chosen instead of templates because at the time, not all C++
compilers supported templates.  Now if it was done all over again,
they'd do something like libsigc++, or boost.

> And Stroustrup's thick book didn't even seem to be aware of callbacks as
> a paradigm and thus didn't show any examples of dealing with them. Too
> bad Stroustrup wasn't aware of C#'s delegates; C++ should have defined
> function pointers as delegates.

Maybe the language doesn't need to implement them as keywords because
it's already possible to do safely with templates.  libsigc++ is a great
implementation that works really well (and it's quite fast at
dispatching events).  libsigc++ has an advantage over Qt in that the
signals are actual type-safe template objects.  Qt's signals are
actually strings under the hood, and I've had weird name clash issues in
the past when I didn't realize that.  Can't remember the circumstances
or the details now.  Basically something that should have been caught at
compile time became a runtime error.

Doing event-driven programming with Gtkmm and libsigc++ is actually
pretty darn nice and is right at home in C++.

> There is one big advantage C++ has over C: virtual method dispatching.
> However, I have been able to come up with C idioms that make practical
> method dispatching relatively painless.

Seems like Vala might fit this niche pretty well.

Back to comp.lang.python | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

Python vs C++ David Palao <dpalao.python@gmail.com> - 2014-08-21 14:54 +0200
  Re: Python vs C++ wxjmfauth@gmail.com - 2014-08-21 07:08 -0700
  Re: Python vs C++ Rustom Mody <rustompmody@gmail.com> - 2014-08-21 07:10 -0700
  Re: Python vs C++ Grant Edwards <invalid@invalid.invalid> - 2014-08-21 14:59 +0000
    Re: Python vs C++ Dennis Lee Bieber <wlfraed@ix.netcom.com> - 2014-08-21 23:12 -0400
  Re: Python vs C++ Christian Gollwitzer <auriocus@gmx.de> - 2014-08-22 10:05 +0200
    Re: Python vs C++ Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2014-08-22 18:50 +1000
      Re: Python vs C++ Marko Rauhamaa <marko@pacujo.net> - 2014-08-22 12:29 +0300
        Re: Python vs C++ "Neil D. Cerutti" <neilc@norwich.edu> - 2014-08-22 08:51 -0400
        Re: Python vs C++ Skip Montanaro <skip@pobox.com> - 2014-08-22 07:58 -0500
          Re: Python vs C++ Marko Rauhamaa <marko@pacujo.net> - 2014-08-22 20:16 +0300
            Re: Python vs C++ mm0fmf <none@mailinator.com> - 2014-08-23 17:47 +0100
              Re: Python vs C++ Marko Rauhamaa <marko@pacujo.net> - 2014-08-23 19:54 +0300
        Re: Python vs C++ Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2014-08-22 23:00 +1000
        Re: Python vs C++ Christian Gollwitzer <auriocus@gmx.de> - 2014-08-22 21:25 +0200
          Re: Python vs C++ Stefan Behnel <stefan_ml@behnel.de> - 2014-08-22 21:58 +0200
          Re: Python vs C++ Marko Rauhamaa <marko@pacujo.net> - 2014-08-22 23:06 +0300
            Re: Python vs C++ Michael Torrie <torriem@gmail.com> - 2014-08-22 15:38 -0600
              Re: Python vs C++ wxjmfauth@gmail.com - 2014-08-23 03:00 -0700
            Re: Python vs C++ Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2014-08-23 07:49 +1000
              Re: Python vs C++ Rustom Mody <rustompmody@gmail.com> - 2014-08-23 05:38 -0700
                Re: Python vs C++ Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2014-08-23 23:00 +1000
                Re: Python vs C++ Ian Kelly <ian.g.kelly@gmail.com> - 2014-08-23 08:02 -0600
                Re: Python vs C++ Rustom Mody <rustompmody@gmail.com> - 2014-08-23 07:21 -0700
                Re: Python vs C++ Terry Reedy <tjreedy@udel.edu> - 2014-08-23 16:51 -0400
                Re: Python vs C++ Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2014-08-24 00:21 +1000
                Re: Python vs C++ Terry Reedy <tjreedy@udel.edu> - 2014-08-23 15:09 -0400
                Re: Python vs C++ Joseph Martinot-Lagarde <joseph.martinot-lagarde@m4x.org> - 2014-08-24 14:54 +0200
                Re: Python vs C++ "Neil D. Cerutti" <neilc@norwich.edu> - 2014-08-25 09:01 -0400
            Re: Python vs C++ Michael Torrie <torriem@gmail.com> - 2014-08-22 15:56 -0600
            Re: Python vs C++ Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2014-08-23 08:00 +1000
              Re: Python vs C++ Marko Rauhamaa <marko@pacujo.net> - 2014-08-23 10:27 +0300
            Re: Python vs C++ dieter <dieter@handshake.de> - 2014-08-23 07:56 +0200
            Re: Python vs C++ Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2014-08-23 16:11 +1000
              Re: Python vs C++ Paul Rudin <paul.nospam@rudin.co.uk> - 2014-08-23 08:36 +0100
                Re: Python vs C++ Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2014-08-23 18:04 +1000
          Re: Python vs C++ dieter <dieter@handshake.de> - 2014-08-23 07:48 +0200

csiph-web