Re: best text editor for programming Python on a Mac

Path	csiph.com!fu-berlin.de!uni-berlin.de!not-for-mail
From	Michael Torrie <torriem@gmail.com>
Newsgroups	comp.lang.python
Subject	Re: best text editor for programming Python on a Mac
Date	Sat, 18 Jun 2016 22:54:16 -0600
Lines	20
Message-ID	<mailman.131.1466312062.2288.python-list@python.org> (permalink)
References	<c7ea39d0-027e-49d0-b049-3ef17929697d@googlegroups.com> <b3fde67f-d52d-b264-7b3c-16cb44952526@gmail.com> <mailman.126.1466291230.2288.python-list@python.org> <ac656b73-cc39-412b-81ec-02795aab98f8@googlegroups.com> <e8cf3aeb-a0af-2474-78f5-b19bdb4551bb@gmail.com> <mailman.130.1466302157.2288.python-list@python.org> <7fdf0a4d-64ef-495e-82ff-18707e3ca429@googlegroups.com> <a8a7c90a-17aa-cc0e-3dfc-f36dc782cb84@gmail.com>
Mime-Version	1.0
Content-Type	text/plain; charset=windows-1252
Content-Transfer-Encoding	8bit
X-Trace	news.uni-berlin.de eskz78eHeVNEy/mZrrV7XQi0ytbOsa+Q/NTFfqu9Ic0g==
Return-Path	<torriem+gmail@torriefamily.org>
X-Original-To	python-list@python.org
Delivered-To	python-list@mail.python.org
X-Spam-Status	OK 0.002
X-Spam-Evidence	'H': 1.00; 'S': 0.00; 'subject:text': 0.04; 'subject:Python': 0.05; 'convention.': 0.07; 'subject:editor': 0.07; 'vi,': 0.07; 'ignoring': 0.09; 'scripting': 0.09; 'things.': 0.15; '2016': 0.16; 'did.': 0.16; 'from:addr:torriem': 0.16; 'from:name:michael torrie': 0.16; 'lend': 0.16; 'received:io': 0.16; 'received:psf.io': 0.16; 'subject:Mac': 0.16; 'subject:programming': 0.16; 'wrote:': 0.16; 'later': 0.16; 'saying': 0.22; 'lawrence': 0.22; 'header:In-Reply-To:1': 0.24; 'header:User-Agent:1': 0.26; "doesn't": 0.26; 'command': 0.26; 'compatible': 0.27; 'figured': 0.29; 'follows': 0.29; 'structure,': 0.29; 'character': 0.29; 'though,': 0.32; 'michael': 0.33; 'true.': 0.33; 'message-id:@gmail.com': 0.34; 'text': 0.35; 'but': 0.36; "wasn't": 0.36; 'to:addr:python-list': 0.36; 'pm,': 0.36; 'subject:: ': 0.37; 'two': 0.37; 'being': 0.37; 'received:org': 0.37; 'doing': 0.38; 'itself': 0.38; 'why': 0.39; 'received:192': 0.39; 'to:addr:python.org': 0.40; 'yes': 0.62; 'charset:windows-1252': 0.62; 'different': 0.63; 'necessarily': 0.63; 'better.': 0.66; 'obvious': 0.76; 'mistake': 0.91
X-Virus-Scanned	amavisd-new at torriefamily.org
User-Agent	Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.1.1
In-Reply-To	<7fdf0a4d-64ef-495e-82ff-18707e3ca429@googlegroups.com>
X-BeenThere	python-list@python.org
X-Mailman-Version	2.1.22
Precedence	list
List-Id	General discussion list for the Python programming language <python-list.python.org>
List-Unsubscribe	<https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-list>, <mailto:python-list-request@python.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive	<http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-list/>
List-Post	<mailto:python-list@python.org>
List-Help	<mailto:python-list-request@python.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe	<https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list>, <mailto:python-list-request@python.org?subject=subscribe>
X-Mailman-Original-Message-ID	<a8a7c90a-17aa-cc0e-3dfc-f36dc782cb84@gmail.com>
X-Mailman-Original-References	<c7ea39d0-027e-49d0-b049-3ef17929697d@googlegroups.com> <b3fde67f-d52d-b264-7b3c-16cb44952526@gmail.com> <mailman.126.1466291230.2288.python-list@python.org> <ac656b73-cc39-412b-81ec-02795aab98f8@googlegroups.com> <e8cf3aeb-a0af-2474-78f5-b19bdb4551bb@gmail.com> <mailman.130.1466302157.2288.python-list@python.org> <7fdf0a4d-64ef-495e-82ff-18707e3ca429@googlegroups.com>
Xref	csiph.com comp.lang.python:110127

Show key headers only | View raw

On 06/18/2016 08:51 PM, Lawrence D’Oliveiro wrote:
> On Sunday, June 19, 2016 at 2:09:31 PM UTC+12, Michael Torrie wrote:
>> It was later on that they figured out the N+1 thing you mentioned by
>> ignoring the character cells:
>>
>> 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
>>  H E L L O W O R L D
>>
>> That works well for interactive editing, but it doesn't lend itself as
>> well to scripting and working with the contents of the text cells.
> 
> Emacs scripting works perfectly well with this convention.

Yes that's true.

Just saying though, it wasn't always obvious which is why ed chose to do
it the way they did.  vi, being somewhat compatible with ed's command
structure, follows the same pattern.  Two different ways of doing
things. Let's not make the mistake of thinking one way is necessarily
better.

Thread

csiph-web