Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.lang.python > #76437
| From | "Joseph L. Casale" <jcasale@activenetwerx.com> |
|---|---|
| Subject | RE: GIL detector |
| Date | 2014-08-17 16:01 +0000 |
| References | <53f0ba6c$0$29982$c3e8da3$5496439d@news.astraweb.com> <lsqhj1$ok8$1@ger.gmane.org> |
| Newsgroups | comp.lang.python |
| Message-ID | <mailman.13072.1408291308.18130.python-list@python.org> (permalink) |
> I don't have to care about threading issues all the time and > can otherwise freely choose the right model of parallelism that suits my > current use case when the need arises (and threads are rarely the right > model). I'm sure that's not just me. The sound bite of a loyal Python coder:) If it weren't for these "useless" threads, you wouldn't have even been able to send that message, let alone do anything on a computer for that matter. That generalization is a "bit" broad, the argument is pointless when it moves away from a purely technical to an emotionally basis. A failure to separate the two pigeonholes the progress of the language and hides underlying constraints which is what Armins post was trying to bring forward. It's naïve to think the first crack of anything is immune to refactoring. No one said Python doesn't have any merit and I honestly don't know a perfect language that has no need for improvement somewhere. I am sure however that the topic is a concern for many use cases (not all). jlc
Back to comp.lang.python | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
GIL detector Steven D'Aprano <steve+comp.lang.python@pearwood.info> - 2014-08-18 00:21 +1000
Re: GIL detector Johannes Bauer <dfnsonfsduifb@gmx.de> - 2014-08-17 16:40 +0200
Re: GIL detector Steven D'Aprano <steve+comp.lang.python@pearwood.info> - 2014-08-18 01:01 +1000
Re: GIL detector Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2014-08-18 00:52 +1000
Re: GIL detector Stefan Behnel <stefan_ml@behnel.de> - 2014-08-17 17:26 +0200
Re: GIL detector Grant Edwards <invalid@invalid.invalid> - 2014-08-18 15:05 +0000
RE: GIL detector "Joseph L. Casale" <jcasale@activenetwerx.com> - 2014-08-17 16:01 +0000
RE: GIL detector Steven D'Aprano <steve+comp.lang.python@pearwood.info> - 2014-08-18 02:43 +1000
Re: GIL detector Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2014-08-18 02:07 +1000
Re: GIL detector Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2014-08-18 02:12 +1000
csiph-web