Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > comp.lang.python > #102749

Re: [SOLVED] There has to be a better way to split this string!

Path csiph.com!fu-berlin.de!uni-berlin.de!not-for-mail
From Anthony Papillion <anthony@cajuntechie.org>
Newsgroups comp.lang.python
Subject Re: [SOLVED] There has to be a better way to split this string!
Date Tue, 9 Feb 2016 19:58:26 -0600
Lines 24
Message-ID <mailman.13.1455069512.7749.python-list@python.org> (permalink)
References <56BA91B5.5090400@cajuntechie.org> <56BA9505.40900@cajuntechie.org> <85mvr972vv.fsf@benfinney.id.au>
Mime-Version 1.0
Content-Type text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding 8bit
X-Trace news.uni-berlin.de dfosugq5VpIACtV1+5TaPAzajdKwUiPz6HeVzncUN/Ng==
Return-Path <anthony@cajuntechie.org>
X-Original-To python-list@python.org
Delivered-To python-list@mail.python.org
X-Spam-Status OK 0.010
X-Spam-Evidence '*H*': 0.98; '*S*': 0.00; 'subject:: [': 0.03; 'think,': 0.05; 'filename': 0.07; 'filename,': 0.09; 'filename.': 0.09; 'subject:string': 0.09; 'from:addr:anthony': 0.16; 'received:io': 0.16; 'received:psf.io': 0.16; 'subject:There': 0.16; 'wrote:': 0.16; 'looked': 0.16; 'pointer': 0.18; 'subject:] ': 0.19; '>>>': 0.20; 'header:In-Reply-To:1': 0.24; 'module': 0.25; 'header:User-Agent:1': 0.26; "doesn't": 0.26; "skip:' 10": 0.28; 'purposes.': 0.29; "i'm": 0.30; 'that.': 0.30; 'task': 0.30; 'source': 0.33; 'though.': 0.33; 'received:10.0': 0.34; 'library.': 0.35; 'something': 0.35; 'should': 0.36; 'to:addr :python-list': 0.36; 'pm,': 0.36; 'received:10': 0.37; 'thanks': 0.37; 'version': 0.38; 'enough': 0.39; 'to:addr:python.org': 0.40; 'still': 0.40; 'easy': 0.60; 'skip:u 10': 0.61; 'making': 0.62; 'skip:\xe2 10': 0.70; '8bit%:43': 0.72; 'original.': 0.84; 'received:10.0.2': 0.84; 'subject:this': 0.85
User-Agent Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.5.1
In-Reply-To <85mvr972vv.fsf@benfinney.id.au>
X-Zoho-Virus-Status 1
X-BeenThere python-list@python.org
X-Mailman-Version 2.1.21rc2
Precedence list
List-Id General discussion list for the Python programming language <python-list.python.org>
List-Unsubscribe <https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-list>, <mailto:python-list-request@python.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive <http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-list/>
List-Post <mailto:python-list@python.org>
List-Help <mailto:python-list-request@python.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe <https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list>, <mailto:python-list-request@python.org?subject=subscribe>
Xref csiph.com comp.lang.python:102749

Show key headers only | View raw


On 02/09/2016 07:47 PM, Ben Finney wrote:
> Anthony Papillion <anthony@cajuntechie.org> writes:
> 
>> On 02/09/2016 07:26 PM, Anthony Papillion wrote:
>>> I am using datetime.now() to create a unique version of a filename.
>>> […]
>>
>> Found the solution in strftime(). Exactly what I was looking for.
> 
> For the task of making a unique filename, you should also consider the
> ‘tempfile’ module in the standard library.

I looked at tempfile. Unfortunately, the filename has to be both
'unique' and 'identifiable' to the original. So if I am using mydog.jpg
as the source and I am adding something unique to it, it has to still
have mydog.jpg in the filename. Tempfile, I think, doesn't allow an easy
way to do that. So I'm just adding the exact date and time which is
unique enough for my purposes.

Thanks for the pointer though.

Anthony

Back to comp.lang.python | Previous | Next | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

Re: [SOLVED] There has to be a better way to split this string! Anthony Papillion <anthony@cajuntechie.org> - 2016-02-09 19:58 -0600

csiph-web