Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > comp.lang.python > #102749

Re: [SOLVED] There has to be a better way to split this string!

From Anthony Papillion <anthony@cajuntechie.org>
Newsgroups comp.lang.python
Subject Re: [SOLVED] There has to be a better way to split this string!
Date 2016-02-09 19:58 -0600
Message-ID <mailman.13.1455069512.7749.python-list@python.org> (permalink)
References <56BA91B5.5090400@cajuntechie.org> <56BA9505.40900@cajuntechie.org> <85mvr972vv.fsf@benfinney.id.au>

Show all headers | View raw


On 02/09/2016 07:47 PM, Ben Finney wrote:
> Anthony Papillion <anthony@cajuntechie.org> writes:
> 
>> On 02/09/2016 07:26 PM, Anthony Papillion wrote:
>>> I am using datetime.now() to create a unique version of a filename.
>>> […]
>>
>> Found the solution in strftime(). Exactly what I was looking for.
> 
> For the task of making a unique filename, you should also consider the
> ‘tempfile’ module in the standard library.

I looked at tempfile. Unfortunately, the filename has to be both
'unique' and 'identifiable' to the original. So if I am using mydog.jpg
as the source and I am adding something unique to it, it has to still
have mydog.jpg in the filename. Tempfile, I think, doesn't allow an easy
way to do that. So I'm just adding the exact date and time which is
unique enough for my purposes.

Thanks for the pointer though.

Anthony

Back to comp.lang.python | Previous | Next | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

Re: [SOLVED] There has to be a better way to split this string! Anthony Papillion <anthony@cajuntechie.org> - 2016-02-09 19:58 -0600

csiph-web