Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > comp.lang.python > #42789

Re: JIT compilers for Python, what is the latest news?

Path csiph.com!usenet.pasdenom.info!news.albasani.net!newsfeed.freenet.ag!news2.euro.net!newsgate.cistron.nl!newsgate.news.xs4all.nl!post.news.xs4all.nl!not-for-mail
Return-Path <python@mrabarnett.plus.com>
X-Original-To python-list@python.org
Delivered-To python-list@mail.python.org
X-Spam-Status OK 0.025
X-Spam-Evidence '*H*': 0.95; '*S*': 0.00; 'subject:Python': 0.06; '64-bit': 0.07; 'pypy': 0.07; '32-bit': 0.09; 'executed': 0.09; 'obsolete': 0.09; 'python': 0.11; 'from:addr:mrabarnett.plus.com': 0.16; 'from:addr:python': 0.16; 'from:name:mrab': 0.16; 'message- id:@mrabarnett.plus.com': 0.16; 'received:84.93': 0.16; 'received:84.93.230': 0.16; 'wrote:': 0.18; 'looked': 0.18; 'written': 0.21; 'header:User-Agent:1': 0.23; 'initial': 0.24; "haven't": 0.24; 'header:In-Reply-To:1': 0.27; 'appear': 0.29; "doesn't": 0.30; 'said,': 0.30; "i'm": 0.30; 'code': 0.31; '20%': 0.31; 'routine': 0.31; 'subject:what': 0.31; 'run': 0.32; 'quite': 0.32; 'guess': 0.33; 'older': 0.33; 'subject:the': 0.34; 'received:84': 0.35; 'but': 0.35; 'revert': 0.36; 'ubuntu': 0.36; 'subject:?': 0.36; 'project': 0.37; 'performance': 0.37; 'being': 0.38; 'sometimes': 0.38; 'to:addr:python-list': 0.38; 'rather': 0.38; 'to:addr:python.org': 0.39; 'most': 0.60; 'year.': 0.61; 'john': 0.61; 'header:Reply-To:1': 0.67; 'reply-to:no real name:2**0': 0.71; 'increase': 0.74; 'occupied': 0.84; 'reply- to:addr:python.org': 0.84; 'subject:latest': 0.84; 'touched': 0.84; 'execution,': 0.91; 'same,': 0.91
X-CM-Score 0.00
X-CNFS-Analysis v=2.0 cv=ZarDwLpA c=1 sm=1 a=0nF1XD0wxitMEM03M9B4ZQ==:17 a=QUiRZEtCktgA:10 a=oCuRpbx0hGYA:10 a=ihvODaAuJD4A:10 a=OUOv7kDek9cA:10 a=8nJEP1OIZ-IA:10 a=EBOSESyhAAAA:8 a=8AHkEIZyAAAA:8 a=a2ytXfNaI1IA:10 a=PO54ZXzg0NFiR2jPTUkA:9 a=wPNLvfGTeEIA:10 a=0nF1XD0wxitMEM03M9B4ZQ==:117
X-AUTH mrabarnett:2500
Date Fri, 05 Apr 2013 03:39:16 +0100
From MRAB <python@mrabarnett.plus.com>
User-Agent Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 5.1; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130328 Thunderbird/17.0.5
MIME-Version 1.0
To python-list@python.org
Subject Re: JIT compilers for Python, what is the latest news?
References <6ac24546-6cc6-4a01-9fa6-3b52d64484e3@googlegroups.com>
In-Reply-To <6ac24546-6cc6-4a01-9fa6-3b52d64484e3@googlegroups.com>
Content-Type text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding 7bit
X-BeenThere python-list@python.org
X-Mailman-Version 2.1.15
Precedence list
Reply-To python-list@python.org
List-Id General discussion list for the Python programming language <python-list.python.org>
List-Unsubscribe <http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-list>, <mailto:python-list-request@python.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive <http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-list/>
List-Post <mailto:python-list@python.org>
List-Help <mailto:python-list-request@python.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe <http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list>, <mailto:python-list-request@python.org?subject=subscribe>
Newsgroups comp.lang.python
Message-ID <mailman.121.1365129540.3114.python-list@python.org> (permalink)
Lines 20
NNTP-Posting-Host 2001:888:2000:d::a6
X-Trace 1365129540 news.xs4all.nl 6866 [2001:888:2000:d::a6]:32770
X-Complaints-To abuse@xs4all.nl
Xref csiph.com comp.lang.python:42789

Show key headers only | View raw

On 05/04/2013 03:29, John Ladasky wrote:
> I'm revisiting a project that I haven't touched in over a year.  It
> was written in Python 2.6, and executed on 32-bit Ubuntu 10.10.  I
> experienced a 20% performance increase when I used Psyco, because I
> had a computationally-intensive routine which occupied most of my CPU
> cycles, and always received the same data type.  (Multiprocessing
> also helped, and I was using that too.)
>
> I have now migrated to a 64-bit Ubuntu 12.10.1, and Python 3.3.  I
> would rather not revert to my older configuration.  That being said,
> it would appear from my initial reading that 1) Psyco is considered
> obsolete and is no longer maintained, 2) Psyco is being superseded by
> PyPy, 3) PyPy doesn't support Python 3.x, or 64-bit optimizations.
>
> Do I understand all that correctly?
>
> I guess I can live with the 20% slower execution, but sometimes my
> code would run for three solid days...
>
Have you looked at Cython? Not quite the same, but still...

Back to comp.lang.python | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

JIT compilers for Python, what is the latest news? John Ladasky <john_ladasky@sbcglobal.net> - 2013-04-04 19:29 -0700
  Re: JIT compilers for Python, what is the latest news? MRAB <python@mrabarnett.plus.com> - 2013-04-05 03:39 +0100
    Re: JIT compilers for Python, what is the latest news? John Ladasky <john_ladasky@sbcglobal.net> - 2013-04-05 01:34 -0700
      Re: JIT compilers for Python, what is the latest news? Devin Jeanpierre <jeanpierreda@gmail.com> - 2013-04-05 14:37 -0400
      Re: JIT compilers for Python, what is the latest news? Joshua Landau <joshua.landau.ws@gmail.com> - 2013-04-06 11:23 +0100
    Re: JIT compilers for Python, what is the latest news? John Ladasky <john_ladasky@sbcglobal.net> - 2013-04-05 01:34 -0700
  Re: JIT compilers for Python, what is the latest news? Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2013-04-05 19:27 +1100
    Re: JIT compilers for Python, what is the latest news? John Ladasky <john_ladasky@sbcglobal.net> - 2013-04-05 01:39 -0700
      Re: JIT compilers for Python, what is the latest news? Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2013-04-05 19:49 +1100
      Re: JIT compilers for Python, what is the latest news? Ian Kelly <ian.g.kelly@gmail.com> - 2013-04-05 11:32 -0600
        Re: JIT compilers for Python, what is the latest news? John Ladasky <john_ladasky@sbcglobal.net> - 2013-04-05 11:13 -0700
          Re: JIT compilers for Python, what is the latest news? Ian Kelly <ian.g.kelly@gmail.com> - 2013-04-05 13:05 -0600
        Re: JIT compilers for Python, what is the latest news? John Ladasky <john_ladasky@sbcglobal.net> - 2013-04-05 11:13 -0700
      Re: JIT compilers for Python, what is the latest news? Robert Kern <robert.kern@gmail.com> - 2013-04-05 10:46 +0100
    Re: JIT compilers for Python, what is the latest news? John Ladasky <john_ladasky@sbcglobal.net> - 2013-04-05 01:39 -0700
      Re: JIT compilers for Python, what is the latest news? ptb <petertbrady@gmail.com> - 2013-04-05 05:18 -0700
  Re: JIT compilers for Python, what is the latest news? Ian Foote <ian@feete.org> - 2013-04-05 13:50 +0100
  Re: JIT compilers for Python, what is the latest news? Joshua Landau <joshua.landau.ws@gmail.com> - 2013-04-06 11:27 +0100
  Re: JIT compilers for Python, what is the latest news? rusi <rustompmody@gmail.com> - 2013-04-06 08:45 -0700
  Re: JIT compilers for Python, what is the latest news? Stefan Behnel <stefan_ml@behnel.de> - 2013-04-06 21:41 +0200

csiph-web