Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > comp.lang.python > #74287

Re: NaN comparisons - Call For Anecdotes

Path csiph.com!v102.xanadu-bbs.net!xanadu-bbs.net!goblin1!goblin2!goblin.stu.neva.ru!newsfeed.xs4all.nl!newsfeed1a.news.xs4all.nl!xs4all!newsgate.cistron.nl!newsgate.news.xs4all.nl!post.news.xs4all.nl!not-for-mail
Return-Path <ethan@stoneleaf.us>
X-Original-To python-list@python.org
Delivered-To python-list@mail.python.org
X-Spam-Status OK 0.036
X-Spam-Evidence '*H*': 0.93; '*S*': 0.00; 'python,': 0.02; 'anders': 0.09; 'from:addr:ethan': 0.09; 'from:addr:stoneleaf.us': 0.09; 'from:name:ethan furman': 0.09; 'message-id:@stoneleaf.us': 0.09; 'whichever': 0.09; 'yeah,': 0.09; '~ethan~': 0.09; 'nan': 0.16; 'numpy': 0.16; 'received:69.93': 0.16; 'wrote:': 0.18; 'bit': 0.19; 'examples': 0.20; 'seems': 0.21; '(in': 0.22; 'header:User- Agent:1': 0.23; "haven't": 0.24; "i've": 0.25; 'asking': 0.27; 'header:In-Reply-To:1': 0.27; 'point': 0.28; 'along': 0.30; "i'm": 0.30; 'lists': 0.32; 'everyone': 0.33; 'could': 0.34; 'point.': 0.35; 'but': 0.35; 'there': 0.35; 'are,': 0.36; 'interact': 0.36; 'much.': 0.36; 'charset:us-ascii': 0.36; 'too': 0.37; 'easily': 0.37; 'being': 0.38; 'to:addr:python-list': 0.38; 'pm,': 0.38; 'help,': 0.39; 'to:addr:python.org': 0.39; 'how': 0.40; 'received:173': 0.61; 'back': 0.62; 'making': 0.63; 'information': 0.63; 'our': 0.64; 'specialized': 0.65; 'worth': 0.66; 'here': 0.66; 'answer.': 0.68; 'subject:For': 0.78; 'improvement': 0.84; 'nuclear': 0.84; 'pain': 0.84; 'shield': 0.84; 'joel': 0.91; 'hand,': 0.93
Date Wed, 09 Jul 2014 16:17:03 -0700
From Ethan Furman <ethan@stoneleaf.us>
User-Agent Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:16.0) Gecko/20121010 Thunderbird/16.0.1
MIME-Version 1.0
To python-list@python.org
Subject Re: NaN comparisons - Call For Anecdotes
References <53BC05FB.4050707@jmunch.dk> <53BD70F4.4000504@stoneleaf.us> <53BDAF90.8010709@jmunch.dk> <CAPM-O+yiioLm-UiV2fYqc2n9qZrN+_v6RkeqJ7mOQ3Kq+cH0CQ@mail.gmail.com> <53BDCA33.3020100@jmunch.dk>
In-Reply-To <53BDCA33.3020100@jmunch.dk>
Content-Type text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding 7bit
X-AntiAbuse This header was added to track abuse, please include it with any abuse report
X-AntiAbuse Primary Hostname - gator3304.hostgator.com
X-AntiAbuse Original Domain - python.org
X-AntiAbuse Originator/Caller UID/GID - [47 12] / [47 12]
X-AntiAbuse Sender Address Domain - stoneleaf.us
X-BWhitelist no
X-Source-IP 173.12.184.233
X-Exim-ID 1X516l-0000DL-0l
X-Source
X-Source-Args
X-Source-Dir
X-Source-Sender ([173.12.184.233]) [173.12.184.233]:33690
X-Source-Auth ethan+stoneleaf.us
X-Email-Count 1
X-Source-Cap dG9idWs7dG9idWs7Z2F0b3IzMzA0Lmhvc3RnYXRvci5jb20=
X-BeenThere python-list@python.org
X-Mailman-Version 2.1.15
Precedence list
List-Id General discussion list for the Python programming language <python-list.python.org>
List-Unsubscribe <https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-list>, <mailto:python-list-request@python.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive <http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-list/>
List-Post <mailto:python-list@python.org>
List-Help <mailto:python-list-request@python.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe <https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list>, <mailto:python-list-request@python.org?subject=subscribe>
Newsgroups comp.lang.python
Message-ID <mailman.11719.1404949930.18130.python-list@python.org> (permalink)
Lines 22
NNTP-Posting-Host 2001:888:2000:d::a6
X-Trace 1404949930 news.xs4all.nl 2915 [2001:888:2000:d::a6]:59932
X-Complaints-To abuse@xs4all.nl
Xref csiph.com comp.lang.python:74287

Show key headers only | View raw


On 07/09/2014 04:03 PM, Anders J. Munch wrote:
> Joel Goldstick wrote:
>>
>> I've been following along here, and it seems you haven't received the answer you want or need.
>
> So far I received exactly the answer I was expecting.  0 examples of NaN!=NaN being beneficial.

python-list (in whichever from you interact with it) is in no way specialized, yet you are asking for a highly 
specialized bit of information.

> I wasn't asking for help, I was making a point.  Whether that will lead to improvement of Python, well, I'm not too
> optimistic, but I feel the point was worth making regardless.

The only point you have made is that no-one here uses them much.  You could just as easily ask how many of us use 
lead-alloy to shield our in-home nuclear reactors to get the same answer.

On the other hand, if you go and ask on the numpy and simpy and whatever-math-or-science-py lists there are, and get 
affirmative answers from them that yeah, NaN != NaN is just a huge pain and everyone is working around it, then brought 
that information back here -- well, then you will have made the point that you want to make.

--
~Ethan~

Back to comp.lang.python | Previous | Next | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

Re: NaN comparisons - Call For Anecdotes Ethan Furman <ethan@stoneleaf.us> - 2014-07-09 16:17 -0700

csiph-web