Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > comp.lang.python > #105662

Re: [OT'ish] Is there a list as good as this for Javascript

Path csiph.com!fu-berlin.de!uni-berlin.de!not-for-mail
From Mark Lawrence <breamoreboy@yahoo.co.uk>
Newsgroups comp.lang.python
Subject Re: [OT'ish] Is there a list as good as this for Javascript
Date Thu, 24 Mar 2016 22:58:06 +0000
Lines 35
Message-ID <mailman.117.1458860347.2244.python-list@python.org> (permalink)
References <3n0esc-r3p.ln1@esprimo.zbmc.eu> <nd1n9t$8ub$1@reader1.panix.com> <945esc-qkp.ln1@esprimo.zbmc.eu> <nd1pt9$ea2$1@ger.gmane.org> <CAPTjJmoj_v75Wm4QEjqgBxZUHVuODQQ4K-+rc98tOLrQJLeOcA@mail.gmail.com>
Mime-Version 1.0
Content-Type text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding 7bit
X-Trace news.uni-berlin.de CcinsH3PSvZa0L6HDrzegg9C1VyUshDkA86388UESLwQ==
Return-Path <python-python-list@m.gmane.org>
X-Original-To python-list@python.org
Delivered-To python-list@mail.python.org
X-Spam-Status OK 0.001
X-Spam-Evidence '*H*': 1.00; '*S*': 0.00; 'subject:: [': 0.03; 'from:addr:yahoo.co.uk': 0.05; 'javascript,': 0.07; 'received:80.91': 0.09; 'received:80.91.229': 0.09; 'received:gmane.org': 0.09; 'received:list': 0.09; 'threads.': 0.09; 'underlying': 0.09; 'yeah,': 0.09; 'python': 0.10; 'language,': 0.11; ':-)': 0.12; "hasn't": 0.15; '2016': 0.16; 'drag': 0.16; 'enough.': 0.16; 'ok!': 0.16; 'received:194.126': 0.16; 'received:80.91.229.3': 0.16; 'received:io': 0.16; 'received:plane.gmane.org': 0.16; 'received:psf.io': 0.16; 'subject:Javascript': 0.16; 'test".': 0.16; 'write,': 0.16; 'wrote:': 0.16; 'byte': 0.18; 'language': 0.19; 'subject:] ': 0.19; '>>>': 0.20; 'lawrence': 0.22; "world's": 0.22; 'am,': 0.23; 'code.': 0.23; 'header:In-Reply-To:1': 0.24; 'header:User- Agent:1': 0.26; 'subject:list': 0.26; 'header:X-Complaints-To:1': 0.26; 'chris': 0.26; 'community.': 0.27; 'fri,': 0.27; 'right.': 0.27; 'factor': 0.29; 'idea,': 0.29; 'code': 0.30; "i'd": 0.31; 'language.': 0.32; 'source': 0.33; "i'll": 0.33; 'clear': 0.35; 'quite': 0.35; 'to:addr:python-list': 0.36; 'say': 0.37; 'received:org': 0.37; 'anything': 0.38; 'to:addr:python.org': 0.40; 'mark': 0.40; 'leading': 0.61; 'received:194': 0.61; 'no.': 0.62; 'charset:windows-1252': 0.62; 'our': 0.64; 'mar': 0.65; 'subject:there': 0.66; 'expert': 0.70; 'chrisa': 0.84; 'fantastic,': 0.84; 'idiot,': 0.84; 'loose': 0.84; 'pythonistas,': 0.84; 'subject:good': 0.84; 'whereby': 0.84; 'subject:this': 0.85
X-Injected-Via-Gmane http://gmane.org/
X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host 248.80.126.194.pool.dsl.daisyplc.net
User-Agent Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.7.0
In-Reply-To <CAPTjJmoj_v75Wm4QEjqgBxZUHVuODQQ4K-+rc98tOLrQJLeOcA@mail.gmail.com>
X-BeenThere python-list@python.org
X-Mailman-Version 2.1.21
Precedence list
List-Id General discussion list for the Python programming language <python-list.python.org>
List-Unsubscribe <https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-list>, <mailto:python-list-request@python.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive <http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-list/>
List-Post <mailto:python-list@python.org>
List-Help <mailto:python-list-request@python.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe <https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list>, <mailto:python-list-request@python.org?subject=subscribe>
Xref csiph.com comp.lang.python:105662

Show key headers only | View raw

On 24/03/2016 22:49, Chris Angelico wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 25, 2016 at 9:31 AM, Mark Lawrence <breamoreboy@yahoo.co.uk> wrote:
>> On 24/03/2016 22:08, cl@isbd.net wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>> If you do find anything like c.l.p for Javascript, let us know...
>>>>
>>> OK!  :-)
>>>
>>
>> I'd try c.l.bartc as he is the world's leading expert on everything that you
>> need to know about any language, whereby the only thing to know is how fast
>> is it.  It's just fantastic, you don't have to bother about the source code
>> that you write, all you have to bother about is the underlying byte code.
>
> Enough. You don't need to drag this into arbitrary threads.
>
> ChrisA
>

No.  While this idiot, BartC, is let loose on this forum, I'll say what 
I like.  It is quite clear that he hasn't got the faintest idea, and the 
sooner he is kicked into touch, like the RUE, the better for the Python 
community.

"I'll just factor out the loop in this test".

Yeah, right.

-- 
My fellow Pythonistas, ask not what our language can do for you, ask
what you can do for our language.

Mark Lawrence

Back to comp.lang.python | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

[OT'ish] Is there a list as good as this for Javascript cl@isbd.net - 2016-03-24 20:53 +0000
  Re: [OT'ish] Is there a list as good as this for Javascript Grant Edwards <invalid@invalid.invalid> - 2016-03-24 21:47 +0000
    Re: [OT'ish] Is there a list as good as this for Javascript cl@isbd.net - 2016-03-24 22:08 +0000
      Re: [OT'ish] Is there a list as good as this for Javascript Mark Lawrence <breamoreboy@yahoo.co.uk> - 2016-03-24 22:31 +0000
        Re: [OT'ish] Is there a list as good as this for Javascript cl@isbd.net - 2016-03-24 22:45 +0000
          Re: [OT'ish] Is there a list as good as this for Javascript Mark Lawrence <breamoreboy@yahoo.co.uk> - 2016-03-24 23:06 +0000
            Re: [OT'ish] Is there a list as good as this for Javascript Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2016-03-25 22:19 +0100
          Re: [OT'ish] Is there a list as good as this for Javascript Joel Goldstick <joel.goldstick@gmail.com> - 2016-03-24 19:09 -0400
      Re: [OT'ish] Is there a list as good as this for Javascript Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2016-03-25 09:49 +1100
      Re: [OT'ish] Is there a list as good as this for Javascript Mark Lawrence <breamoreboy@yahoo.co.uk> - 2016-03-24 22:58 +0000
      Re: [OT'ish] Is there a list as good as this for Javascript Ian Kelly <ian.g.kelly@gmail.com> - 2016-03-24 17:33 -0600
      Re: [OT'ish] Is there a list as good as this for Javascript Mark Lawrence <breamoreboy@yahoo.co.uk> - 2016-03-24 23:46 +0000
        Re: [OT'ish] Is there a list as good as this for Javascript Ned Batchelder <ned@nedbatchelder.com> - 2016-03-24 17:38 -0700
          Negative responses (Re: [OT'ish] Is there a list) Rustom Mody <rustompmody@gmail.com> - 2016-03-24 21:10 -0700
        Re: [OT'ish] Is there a list as good as this for Javascript alister <alister.ware@ntlworld.com> - 2016-03-25 11:05 +0000
      Re: [OT'ish] Is there a list as good as this for Javascript Ben Finney <ben+python@benfinney.id.au> - 2016-03-25 12:41 +1100
  Re: [OT'ish] Is there a list as good as this for Javascript Larry Martell <larry.martell@gmail.com> - 2016-03-24 20:25 -0400
    Re: [OT'ish] Is there a list as good as this for Javascript cl@isbd.net - 2016-03-25 09:05 +0000
  Re: [OT'ish] Is there a list as good as this for Javascript Cousin Stanley <cousinstanley@gmail.com> - 2016-03-25 10:58 -0700
    Re: [OT'ish] Is there a list as good as this for Javascript Ben Bacarisse <ben.usenet@bsb.me.uk> - 2016-03-25 19:26 +0000
  Re: [OT'ish] Is there a list as good as this for Javascript Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2016-03-25 22:17 +0100
    Re: [OT'ish] Is there a list as good as this for Javascript Ned Batchelder <ned@nedbatchelder.com> - 2016-03-25 16:36 -0700
      Re: [OT'ish] Is there a list as good as this for Javascript Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2016-03-26 02:36 +0100
        Re: [OT'ish] Is there a list as good as this for Javascript Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2016-03-26 14:16 +1100
          Re: [OT'ish] Is there a list as good as this for Javascript Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2016-03-26 04:37 +0100
            Re: [OT'ish] Is there a list as good as this for Javascript Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2016-03-26 15:24 +1100
              Re: [OT'ish] Is there a list as good as this for Javascript Rustom Mody <rustompmody@gmail.com> - 2016-03-25 22:10 -0700
            Re: [OT'ish] Is there a list as good as this for Javascript Ned Batchelder <ned@nedbatchelder.com> - 2016-03-26 04:37 -0700
              Re: [OT'ish] Is there a list as good as this for Javascript Larry Martell <larry.martell@gmail.com> - 2016-03-26 07:52 -0400
              Re: [OT'ish] Is there a list as good as this for Javascript Gene Heskett <gheskett@wdtv.com> - 2016-03-26 11:31 -0400
              Re: [OT'ish] Is there a list as good as this for Javascript Larry Martell <larry.martell@gmail.com> - 2016-03-26 11:35 -0400
              Re: [OT'ish] Is there a list as good as this for Javascript Michael Torrie <torriem@gmail.com> - 2016-03-26 11:49 -0600
              Re: [OT'ish] Is there a list as good as this for Javascript Michael Torrie <torriem@gmail.com> - 2016-03-26 12:01 -0600
        Re: [OT'ish] Is there a list as good as this for Javascript Cameron Simpson <cs@zip.com.au> - 2016-03-27 09:01 +1100
      Re: [OT'ish] Is there a list as good as this for Javascript cl@isbd.net - 2016-03-26 14:01 +0000
    Re: [OT'ish] Is there a list as good as this for Javascript Steven D'Aprano <steve@pearwood.info> - 2016-03-26 13:14 +1100
    Re: [OT'ish] Is there a list as good as this for Javascript cl@isbd.net - 2016-03-26 13:59 +0000
  Re: [OT'ish] Is there a list as good as this for Javascript Mark Lawrence <breamoreboy@yahoo.co.uk> - 2016-03-26 14:38 +0000
    Re: [OT'ish] Is there a list as good as this for Javascript Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2016-03-26 18:58 +0100
  Re: [OT'ish] Is there a list as good as this for Javascript Gene Heskett <gheskett@wdtv.com> - 2016-03-26 12:06 -0400
    Re: [OT'ish] Is there a list as good as this for Javascript Gregory Ewing <greg.ewing@canterbury.ac.nz> - 2016-03-27 17:05 +1300
      Re: [OT'ish] Is there a list as good as this for Javascript Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2016-03-27 15:16 +1100

csiph-web