Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > comp.lang.python > #105728

Re: [OT'ish] Is there a list as good as this for Javascript

Newsgroups comp.lang.python
Date 2016-03-25 22:10 -0700
References (2 earlier) <09151817-fc79-4077-89a0-66e0c6551f9f@googlegroups.com> <1686453.n4820qZuCL@PointedEars.de> <mailman.17.1458962213.28225.python-list@python.org> <3039159.EZm1bvJSo6@PointedEars.de> <mailman.19.1458966294.28225.python-list@python.org>
Message-ID <9a1e684a-2877-4520-8bb5-00853ef04996@googlegroups.com> (permalink)
Subject Re: [OT'ish] Is there a list as good as this for Javascript
From Rustom Mody <rustompmody@gmail.com>

Show all headers | View raw

On Saturday, March 26, 2016 at 9:55:15 AM UTC+5:30, Chris Angelico wrote:
> On Sat, Mar 26, 2016 at 2:37 PM, Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn wrote:
> > Chris Angelico wrote:
> >
> >> On Sat, Mar 26, 2016 at 12:36 PM, Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn wrote:
> >>>> Thomas is not typical of the Python community. We are mostly nice
> >>>> people.
> >>>> :)
> >>>
> >>> You do not even know me.  I *am* a nice person, if only for the fact that
> >>> I do not let people suffer from their own ignorance, and I encourage them
> >>> to educate and enlighten themselves in order not be dependent on people
> >>> like you who tell them what they should think.
> >>>
> >>> So *evidentially*, *you* are not a nice person.  According to your own
> >>> "logic", *you* do not belong in the Python community.  Go away.
> >>
> >> King Gama is a nicer person than you are, and in very similar ways.
> >
> > I do not know a person called "King Gama", I do not think I need to know
> > them, I do not think that he is on-topic here either, and I think that you
> > should keep in mind that this is not a niceness contest, but a technical
> > newsgroup/mailing list.  I for one prefer a direct, if blunt, correct answer
> > over a nice, evading or incorrect one any time.
> >
> > See also: <http://www.catb.org/esr/faqs/smart-questions.html#not_losing>
> >
> >
> > F'up2 poster
> 
> Fine. You want a blunt answer?
> 
> You, Thomas, are not a nice person. You think you are, but you are
> not. Be nicer or go away. Please.

"You think??"
I think you just failed the Turing test Chris <wink>
Do admit it though...

Thomas 'juvenile' Lahn does a better job than Dihedral

Back to comp.lang.python | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

[OT'ish] Is there a list as good as this for Javascript cl@isbd.net - 2016-03-24 20:53 +0000
  Re: [OT'ish] Is there a list as good as this for Javascript Grant Edwards <invalid@invalid.invalid> - 2016-03-24 21:47 +0000
    Re: [OT'ish] Is there a list as good as this for Javascript cl@isbd.net - 2016-03-24 22:08 +0000
      Re: [OT'ish] Is there a list as good as this for Javascript Mark Lawrence <breamoreboy@yahoo.co.uk> - 2016-03-24 22:31 +0000
        Re: [OT'ish] Is there a list as good as this for Javascript cl@isbd.net - 2016-03-24 22:45 +0000
          Re: [OT'ish] Is there a list as good as this for Javascript Mark Lawrence <breamoreboy@yahoo.co.uk> - 2016-03-24 23:06 +0000
            Re: [OT'ish] Is there a list as good as this for Javascript Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2016-03-25 22:19 +0100
          Re: [OT'ish] Is there a list as good as this for Javascript Joel Goldstick <joel.goldstick@gmail.com> - 2016-03-24 19:09 -0400
      Re: [OT'ish] Is there a list as good as this for Javascript Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2016-03-25 09:49 +1100
      Re: [OT'ish] Is there a list as good as this for Javascript Mark Lawrence <breamoreboy@yahoo.co.uk> - 2016-03-24 22:58 +0000
      Re: [OT'ish] Is there a list as good as this for Javascript Ian Kelly <ian.g.kelly@gmail.com> - 2016-03-24 17:33 -0600
      Re: [OT'ish] Is there a list as good as this for Javascript Mark Lawrence <breamoreboy@yahoo.co.uk> - 2016-03-24 23:46 +0000
        Re: [OT'ish] Is there a list as good as this for Javascript Ned Batchelder <ned@nedbatchelder.com> - 2016-03-24 17:38 -0700
          Negative responses (Re: [OT'ish] Is there a list) Rustom Mody <rustompmody@gmail.com> - 2016-03-24 21:10 -0700
        Re: [OT'ish] Is there a list as good as this for Javascript alister <alister.ware@ntlworld.com> - 2016-03-25 11:05 +0000
      Re: [OT'ish] Is there a list as good as this for Javascript Ben Finney <ben+python@benfinney.id.au> - 2016-03-25 12:41 +1100
  Re: [OT'ish] Is there a list as good as this for Javascript Larry Martell <larry.martell@gmail.com> - 2016-03-24 20:25 -0400
    Re: [OT'ish] Is there a list as good as this for Javascript cl@isbd.net - 2016-03-25 09:05 +0000
  Re: [OT'ish] Is there a list as good as this for Javascript Cousin Stanley <cousinstanley@gmail.com> - 2016-03-25 10:58 -0700
    Re: [OT'ish] Is there a list as good as this for Javascript Ben Bacarisse <ben.usenet@bsb.me.uk> - 2016-03-25 19:26 +0000
  Re: [OT'ish] Is there a list as good as this for Javascript Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2016-03-25 22:17 +0100
    Re: [OT'ish] Is there a list as good as this for Javascript Ned Batchelder <ned@nedbatchelder.com> - 2016-03-25 16:36 -0700
      Re: [OT'ish] Is there a list as good as this for Javascript Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2016-03-26 02:36 +0100
        Re: [OT'ish] Is there a list as good as this for Javascript Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2016-03-26 14:16 +1100
          Re: [OT'ish] Is there a list as good as this for Javascript Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2016-03-26 04:37 +0100
            Re: [OT'ish] Is there a list as good as this for Javascript Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2016-03-26 15:24 +1100
              Re: [OT'ish] Is there a list as good as this for Javascript Rustom Mody <rustompmody@gmail.com> - 2016-03-25 22:10 -0700
            Re: [OT'ish] Is there a list as good as this for Javascript Ned Batchelder <ned@nedbatchelder.com> - 2016-03-26 04:37 -0700
              Re: [OT'ish] Is there a list as good as this for Javascript Larry Martell <larry.martell@gmail.com> - 2016-03-26 07:52 -0400
              Re: [OT'ish] Is there a list as good as this for Javascript Gene Heskett <gheskett@wdtv.com> - 2016-03-26 11:31 -0400
              Re: [OT'ish] Is there a list as good as this for Javascript Larry Martell <larry.martell@gmail.com> - 2016-03-26 11:35 -0400
              Re: [OT'ish] Is there a list as good as this for Javascript Michael Torrie <torriem@gmail.com> - 2016-03-26 11:49 -0600
              Re: [OT'ish] Is there a list as good as this for Javascript Michael Torrie <torriem@gmail.com> - 2016-03-26 12:01 -0600
        Re: [OT'ish] Is there a list as good as this for Javascript Cameron Simpson <cs@zip.com.au> - 2016-03-27 09:01 +1100
      Re: [OT'ish] Is there a list as good as this for Javascript cl@isbd.net - 2016-03-26 14:01 +0000
    Re: [OT'ish] Is there a list as good as this for Javascript Steven D'Aprano <steve@pearwood.info> - 2016-03-26 13:14 +1100
    Re: [OT'ish] Is there a list as good as this for Javascript cl@isbd.net - 2016-03-26 13:59 +0000
  Re: [OT'ish] Is there a list as good as this for Javascript Mark Lawrence <breamoreboy@yahoo.co.uk> - 2016-03-26 14:38 +0000
    Re: [OT'ish] Is there a list as good as this for Javascript Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2016-03-26 18:58 +0100
  Re: [OT'ish] Is there a list as good as this for Javascript Gene Heskett <gheskett@wdtv.com> - 2016-03-26 12:06 -0400
    Re: [OT'ish] Is there a list as good as this for Javascript Gregory Ewing <greg.ewing@canterbury.ac.nz> - 2016-03-27 17:05 +1300
      Re: [OT'ish] Is there a list as good as this for Javascript Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2016-03-27 15:16 +1100

csiph-web