Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.lang.python > #73516
| Path | csiph.com!v102.xanadu-bbs.net!xanadu-bbs.net!feeder.erje.net!eu.feeder.erje.net!newsfeed.fsmpi.rwth-aachen.de!news-2.dfn.de!news.dfn.de!npeer.de.kpn-eurorings.net!npeer-ng0.de.kpn-eurorings.net!news.tele.dk!news.tele.dk!small.news.tele.dk!newsgate.cistron.nl!newsgate.news.xs4all.nl!post.news.xs4all.nl!not-for-mail |
|---|---|
| Return-Path | <python-python-list@m.gmane.org> |
| X-Original-To | python-list@python.org |
| Delivered-To | python-list@mail.python.org |
| X-Spam-Status | OK 0.001 |
| X-Spam-Evidence | '*H*': 1.00; '*S*': 0.00; 'subject:Python': 0.06; 'explicit': 0.07; 'session.': 0.07; 'received:80.91': 0.09; 'received:80.91.229': 0.09; 'received:gmane.org': 0.09; 'received:list': 0.09; 'thread': 0.14; '"classic"': 0.16; 'orm,': 0.16; 'received:80.91.229.3': 0.16; 'received:plane.gmane.org': 0.16; 'received:zen.co.uk': 0.16; 'sqlalchemy': 0.16; 'subject:ORM': 0.16; 'subject:library': 0.16; 'wrote:': 0.18; 'memory': 0.22; 'header:User-Agent:1': 0.23; 'instead.': 0.24; "i've": 0.25; 'gets': 0.27; 'header:X-Complaints-To:1': 0.27; 'header:In-Reply-To:1': 0.27; 'that.': 0.31; 'but': 0.35; 'object,': 0.36; 'doing': 0.36; 'subject:?': 0.36; 'too': 0.37; 'ends': 0.38; 'to:addr:python-list': 0.38; 'to:addr:python.org': 0.39; 'received:org': 0.40; 'email addr:gmail.com': 0.63; 'subject:read': 0.84 |
| X-Injected-Via-Gmane | http://gmane.org/ |
| To | python-list@python.org |
| From | Lie Ryan <lie.1296@gmail.com> |
| Subject | Re: Python ORM library for distributed mostly-read-only objects? |
| Date | Mon, 23 Jun 2014 16:54:38 +0100 |
| References | <85659fdd-511b-4aea-9c4b-17a4bbb88662@googlegroups.com> |
| Mime-Version | 1.0 |
| Content-Type | text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed |
| Content-Transfer-Encoding | 7bit |
| X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host | 82-69-92-136.dsl.in-addr.zen.co.uk |
| User-Agent | Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.5.0 |
| In-Reply-To | <85659fdd-511b-4aea-9c4b-17a4bbb88662@googlegroups.com> |
| X-BeenThere | python-list@python.org |
| X-Mailman-Version | 2.1.15 |
| Precedence | list |
| List-Id | General discussion list for the Python programming language <python-list.python.org> |
| List-Unsubscribe | <https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-list>, <mailto:python-list-request@python.org?subject=unsubscribe> |
| List-Archive | <http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-list/> |
| List-Post | <mailto:python-list@python.org> |
| List-Help | <mailto:python-list-request@python.org?subject=help> |
| List-Subscribe | <https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list>, <mailto:python-list-request@python.org?subject=subscribe> |
| Newsgroups | comp.lang.python |
| Message-ID | <mailman.11203.1403538899.18130.python-list@python.org> (permalink) |
| Lines | 7 |
| NNTP-Posting-Host | 2001:888:2000:d::a6 |
| X-Trace | 1403538899 news.xs4all.nl 2899 [2001:888:2000:d::a6]:55407 |
| X-Complaints-To | abuse@xs4all.nl |
| Xref | csiph.com comp.lang.python:73516 |
Show key headers only | View raw
On 22/06/14 10:46, smurfix@gmail.com wrote: > > I've been doing this with a "classic" session-based SQLAlchemy ORM, approach, but that ends up way too slow and memory intense, as each thread gets its own copy of every object it needs. I don't want that. If you don't want each thread to have their own copy of the object, Don't use thread-scoped session. Use explicit scope instead.
Back to comp.lang.python | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Python ORM library for distributed mostly-read-only objects? smurfix@gmail.com - 2014-06-22 02:46 -0700
Re: Python ORM library for distributed mostly-read-only objects? Roy Smith <roy@panix.com> - 2014-06-22 09:49 -0400
Re: Python ORM library for distributed mostly-read-only objects? smurfix@gmail.com - 2014-06-22 21:26 -0700
Re: Python ORM library for distributed mostly-read-only objects? William Ray Wing <wrw@mac.com> - 2014-06-23 09:43 -0400
Re: Python ORM library for distributed mostly-read-only objects? Roy Smith <roy@panix.com> - 2014-06-23 11:11 -0400
Re: Python ORM library for distributed mostly-read-only objects? smurfix@gmail.com - 2014-06-23 11:00 -0700
Re: Python ORM library for distributed mostly-read-only objects? Matthias Urlichs <matthias@urlichs.de> - 2014-06-23 19:42 +0200
Re: Python ORM library for distributed mostly-read-only objects? Lie Ryan <lie.1296@gmail.com> - 2014-06-23 16:54 +0100
Re: Python ORM library for distributed mostly-read-only objects? smurfix@gmail.com - 2014-06-23 11:05 -0700
Re: Python ORM library for distributed mostly-read-only objects? Lie Ryan <lie.1296@gmail.com> - 2014-06-24 00:16 +0100
csiph-web