Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.lang.python > #73516
| From | Lie Ryan <lie.1296@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Subject | Re: Python ORM library for distributed mostly-read-only objects? |
| Date | 2014-06-23 16:54 +0100 |
| References | <85659fdd-511b-4aea-9c4b-17a4bbb88662@googlegroups.com> |
| Newsgroups | comp.lang.python |
| Message-ID | <mailman.11203.1403538899.18130.python-list@python.org> (permalink) |
On 22/06/14 10:46, smurfix@gmail.com wrote: > > I've been doing this with a "classic" session-based SQLAlchemy ORM, approach, but that ends up way too slow and memory intense, as each thread gets its own copy of every object it needs. I don't want that. If you don't want each thread to have their own copy of the object, Don't use thread-scoped session. Use explicit scope instead.
Back to comp.lang.python | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Python ORM library for distributed mostly-read-only objects? smurfix@gmail.com - 2014-06-22 02:46 -0700
Re: Python ORM library for distributed mostly-read-only objects? Roy Smith <roy@panix.com> - 2014-06-22 09:49 -0400
Re: Python ORM library for distributed mostly-read-only objects? smurfix@gmail.com - 2014-06-22 21:26 -0700
Re: Python ORM library for distributed mostly-read-only objects? William Ray Wing <wrw@mac.com> - 2014-06-23 09:43 -0400
Re: Python ORM library for distributed mostly-read-only objects? Roy Smith <roy@panix.com> - 2014-06-23 11:11 -0400
Re: Python ORM library for distributed mostly-read-only objects? smurfix@gmail.com - 2014-06-23 11:00 -0700
Re: Python ORM library for distributed mostly-read-only objects? Matthias Urlichs <matthias@urlichs.de> - 2014-06-23 19:42 +0200
Re: Python ORM library for distributed mostly-read-only objects? Lie Ryan <lie.1296@gmail.com> - 2014-06-23 16:54 +0100
Re: Python ORM library for distributed mostly-read-only objects? smurfix@gmail.com - 2014-06-23 11:05 -0700
Re: Python ORM library for distributed mostly-read-only objects? Lie Ryan <lie.1296@gmail.com> - 2014-06-24 00:16 +0100
csiph-web