Re: Under what kind of situation, time.sleep(n) would sleep much longer than n seconds?

References	(2 earlier) <4d7c474a-b88e-4dea-b74c-ed34f4969310@googlegroups.com> <mailman.11128.1403134697.18130.python-list@python.org> <lnu2sb$r3d$1@dont-email.me> <CAPTjJmr+rcZKeYg8T5TEQ=+WmFhgXTPY86n6GaMK=g9B-MX5Mw@mail.gmail.com> <lo06ip$rsc$1@ger.gmane.org>
Date	2014-06-20 12:54 +1000
Subject	Re: Under what kind of situation, time.sleep(n) would sleep much longer than n seconds?
From	Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com>
Newsgroups	comp.lang.python
Message-ID	<mailman.11160.1403232878.18130.python-list@python.org> (permalink)

Show all headers | View raw

On Fri, Jun 20, 2014 at 12:33 PM, Terry Reedy <tjreedy@udel.edu> wrote:
> Most any* console script runs fine** in Idle once you load it into the
> editor and press F5. Prompts and prints go the shell window (default blue on
> white) and input comes from the same (default black on white).

I figured it'd be easy, just couldn't say for sure. (To me, IDLE is
primarily an interactive interpreter, rather than an editor / script
runner.) Thanks for confirming.

ChrisA

Back to comp.lang.python | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

Under what kind of situation, time.sleep(n) would sleep much longer than n seconds? crow <wentlv@gmail.com> - 2014-06-18 02:52 -0700
  Re: Under what kind of situation, time.sleep(n) would sleep much longer than n seconds? Marko Rauhamaa <marko@pacujo.net> - 2014-06-18 13:30 +0300
  Re: Under what kind of situation, time.sleep(n) would sleep much longer than n seconds? Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2014-06-18 20:34 +1000
    Re: Under what kind of situation, time.sleep(n) would sleep much longer than n seconds? crow <wentlv@gmail.com> - 2014-06-18 08:24 -0700
      Re: Under what kind of situation, time.sleep(n) would sleep much longer than n seconds? Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2014-06-19 09:38 +1000
        Re: Under what kind of situation, time.sleep(n) would sleep much longer than n seconds? crow <wentlv@gmail.com> - 2014-06-18 18:41 -0700
          Re: Under what kind of situation, time.sleep(n) would sleep much longer than n seconds? Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2014-06-19 13:58 +1000
        Re: Under what kind of situation, time.sleep(n) would sleep much longer than n seconds? Christian Gollwitzer <auriocus@gmx.de> - 2014-06-19 09:18 +0200
          Re: Under what kind of situation, time.sleep(n) would sleep much longer than n seconds? Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2014-06-19 17:42 +1000
            Re: Under what kind of situation, time.sleep(n) would sleep much longer than n seconds? Marko Rauhamaa <marko@pacujo.net> - 2014-06-19 12:20 +0300
            Re: Under what kind of situation, time.sleep(n) would sleep much longer than n seconds? Christian Gollwitzer <auriocus@gmx.de> - 2014-06-19 19:17 +0200
              Re: Under what kind of situation, time.sleep(n) would sleep much longer than n seconds? Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2014-06-20 08:57 +1000
          Re: Under what kind of situation, time.sleep(n) would sleep much longer than n seconds? Terry Reedy <tjreedy@udel.edu> - 2014-06-19 22:33 -0400
          Re: Under what kind of situation, time.sleep(n) would sleep much longer than n seconds? Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2014-06-20 12:54 +1000

csiph-web