Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > comp.lang.python > #73407

Re: Under what kind of situation, time.sleep(n) would sleep much longer than n seconds?

From Marko Rauhamaa <marko@pacujo.net>
Newsgroups comp.lang.python
Subject Re: Under what kind of situation, time.sleep(n) would sleep much longer than n seconds?
Date 2014-06-19 12:20 +0300
Organization A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID <87lhstntl3.fsf@elektro.pacujo.net> (permalink)
References (1 earlier) <mailman.11114.1403087670.18130.python-list@python.org> <4d7c474a-b88e-4dea-b74c-ed34f4969310@googlegroups.com> <mailman.11128.1403134697.18130.python-list@python.org> <lnu2sb$r3d$1@dont-email.me> <mailman.11135.1403163773.18130.python-list@python.org>

Show all headers | View raw

Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com>:

> Yeah, I think [raw_]input() isn't so bad after all.

I have never used it.

I *have* used getpass.getpass(). Unfortunately, it doesn't have a
corresponding prompt and raw input variant so I've had to essentially
copy over getpass() code and modify that:

   fd = os.open('/dev/tty', os.O_RDWR | os.O_NOCTTY)
   input = output = os.fdopen(fd, 'w+', 1)

etc.

Thing is, the standard streams are used for real work instead of
interacting with the user.


Marko

Back to comp.lang.python | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

Under what kind of situation, time.sleep(n) would sleep much longer than n seconds? crow <wentlv@gmail.com> - 2014-06-18 02:52 -0700
  Re: Under what kind of situation, time.sleep(n) would sleep much longer than n seconds? Marko Rauhamaa <marko@pacujo.net> - 2014-06-18 13:30 +0300
  Re: Under what kind of situation, time.sleep(n) would sleep much longer than n seconds? Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2014-06-18 20:34 +1000
    Re: Under what kind of situation, time.sleep(n) would sleep much longer than n seconds? crow <wentlv@gmail.com> - 2014-06-18 08:24 -0700
      Re: Under what kind of situation, time.sleep(n) would sleep much longer than n seconds? Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2014-06-19 09:38 +1000
        Re: Under what kind of situation, time.sleep(n) would sleep much longer than n seconds? crow <wentlv@gmail.com> - 2014-06-18 18:41 -0700
          Re: Under what kind of situation, time.sleep(n) would sleep much longer than n seconds? Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2014-06-19 13:58 +1000
        Re: Under what kind of situation, time.sleep(n) would sleep much longer than n seconds? Christian Gollwitzer <auriocus@gmx.de> - 2014-06-19 09:18 +0200
          Re: Under what kind of situation, time.sleep(n) would sleep much longer than n seconds? Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2014-06-19 17:42 +1000
            Re: Under what kind of situation, time.sleep(n) would sleep much longer than n seconds? Marko Rauhamaa <marko@pacujo.net> - 2014-06-19 12:20 +0300
            Re: Under what kind of situation, time.sleep(n) would sleep much longer than n seconds? Christian Gollwitzer <auriocus@gmx.de> - 2014-06-19 19:17 +0200
              Re: Under what kind of situation, time.sleep(n) would sleep much longer than n seconds? Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2014-06-20 08:57 +1000
          Re: Under what kind of situation, time.sleep(n) would sleep much longer than n seconds? Terry Reedy <tjreedy@udel.edu> - 2014-06-19 22:33 -0400
          Re: Under what kind of situation, time.sleep(n) would sleep much longer than n seconds? Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2014-06-20 12:54 +1000

csiph-web