Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > comp.lang.python > #20783

Re: A quirk/gotcha of for i, x in enumerate(seq) when seq is empty

Path csiph.com!x330-a1.tempe.blueboxinc.net!usenet.pasdenom.info!gegeweb.org!de-l.enfer-du-nord.net!feeder1.enfer-du-nord.net!newsfeed.eweka.nl!eweka.nl!feeder3.eweka.nl!newsfeed.xs4all.nl!newsfeed5.news.xs4all.nl!xs4all!post.news.xs4all.nl!not-for-mail
Return-Path <python-python-list@m.gmane.org>
X-Original-To python-list@python.org
Delivered-To python-list@mail.python.org
X-Spam-Status OK 0.001
X-Spam-Evidence '*H*': 1.00; '*S*': 0.00; 'fixes': 0.05; 'one?': 0.05; 'subject:when': 0.07; 'python': 0.08; 'minus': 0.09; 'received:80.91': 0.09; 'received:80.91.229': 0.09; 'received:gmane.org': 0.09; 'received:list': 0.09; 'run.': 0.09; 'willmer': 0.09; 'wrong,': 0.09; '~ethan~': 0.09; 'construct.': 0.16; 'need:': 0.16; 'runs.': 0.16; 'scope,': 0.16; 'take?': 0.16; 'wrote:': 0.18; '>>>': 0.18; 'slightly': 0.19; 'seems': 0.20; "doesn't": 0.22; 'header:In-Reply-To:1': 0.22; 'feb': 0.22; 'performing': 0.26; 'stuff': 0.26; 'code': 0.26; 'variable': 0.28; 'raise': 0.28; 'needed,': 0.28; 'avoiding': 0.29; 'problem': 0.29; 'print': 0.29; 'error': 0.30; 'alex': 0.31; 'reporting': 0.31; 'thu,': 0.32; "i've": 0.32; 'header:User-Agent:1': 0.33; 'instead': 0.33; 'header:X-Complaints-To:1': 0.34; 'from:addr:yahoo.co.uk': 0.34; 'loop': 0.34; 'steven': 0.34; 'record': 0.34; 'subject:/': 0.34; 'surprised': 0.34; 'to:addr :python-list': 0.35; 'received:org': 0.36; 'before.': 0.37; 'variables': 0.37; 'but': 0.37; 'should': 0.38; 'sometimes': 0.38; 'e.g.': 0.39; 'to:addr:python.org': 0.40; 'more': 0.61; 'choose': 0.64; 'care': 0.71; 'guaranteed': 0.77; 'general:': 0.84; 'hand.': 0.84; 'refuses': 0.84
X-Injected-Via-Gmane http://gmane.org/
To python-list@python.org
From Mark Lawrence <breamoreboy@yahoo.co.uk>
Subject Re: A quirk/gotcha of for i, x in enumerate(seq) when seq is empty
Date Fri, 24 Feb 2012 07:10:39 +0000
References <14ba4b39-4066-4d24-89d7-3c7c85aab85c@b18g2000vbz.googlegroups.com> <4f46e329$0$29986$c3e8da3$5496439d@news.astraweb.com> <4F4708AD.1020805@stoneleaf.us>
Mime-Version 1.0
Content-Type text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding 7bit
X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host host-92-24-123-195.ppp.as43234.net
User-Agent Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.0; rv:10.0.2) Gecko/20120216 Thunderbird/10.0.2
In-Reply-To <4F4708AD.1020805@stoneleaf.us>
X-Antivirus avast! (VPS 120223-1, 23/02/2012), Outbound message
X-Antivirus-Status Clean
X-BeenThere python-list@python.org
X-Mailman-Version 2.1.12
Precedence list
List-Id General discussion list for the Python programming language <python-list.python.org>
List-Unsubscribe <http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-list>, <mailto:python-list-request@python.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive <http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-list>
List-Post <mailto:python-list@python.org>
List-Help <mailto:python-list-request@python.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe <http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list>, <mailto:python-list-request@python.org?subject=subscribe>
Newsgroups comp.lang.python
Message-ID <mailman.110.1330067451.3037.python-list@python.org> (permalink)
Lines 62
NNTP-Posting-Host 2001:888:2000:d::a6
X-Trace 1330067451 news.xs4all.nl 6917 [2001:888:2000:d::a6]:34728
X-Complaints-To abuse@xs4all.nl
Xref x330-a1.tempe.blueboxinc.net comp.lang.python:20783

Show key headers only | View raw


On 24/02/2012 03:49, Ethan Furman wrote:
> Steven D'Aprano wrote:
>> On Thu, 23 Feb 2012 16:30:09 -0800, Alex Willmer wrote:
>>
>>> This week I was slightly surprised by a behaviour that I've not
>>> considered before. I've long used
>>>
>>> for i, x in enumerate(seq):
>>> # do stuff
>>>
>>> as a standard looping-with-index construct. In Python for loops don't
>>> create a scope, so the loop variables are available afterward. I've
>>> sometimes used this to print or return a record count e.g.
>>>
>>> for i, x in enumerate(seq):
>>> # do stuff
>>> print 'Processed %i records' % i+1
>>>
>>> However as I found out, if seq is empty then i and x are never created.
>>
>> This has nothing to do with enumerate. It applies to for loops in
>> general: the loop variable is not initialised if the loop never runs.
>> What value should it take? Zero? Minus one? The empty string? None?
>> Whatever answer Python choose would be almost always wrong, so it
>> refuses to guess.
>>
>>
>>> The above code will raise NameError. So if a record count is needed, and
>>> the loop is not guaranteed to execute the following seems more correct:
>>>
>>> i = 0
>>> for x in seq:
>>> # do stuff
>>> i += 1
>>> print 'Processed %i records' % i
>>
>> What fixes the problem is not avoiding enumerate, or performing the
>> increments in slow Python instead of fast C, but that you initialise
>> the loop variable you care about before the loop in case it doesn't run.
>>
>> i = 0
>> for i,x in enumerate(seq):
>> # do stuff
>>
>> is all you need: the addition of one extra line, to initialise the
>> loop variable i (and, if you need it, x) before hand.
>
> Actually,
>
> i = -1
>
> or his reporting will be wrong.
>
> ~Ethan~

Methinks an off by one error :)

-- 
Cheers.

Mark Lawrence.

Back to comp.lang.python | Previous | NextPrevious in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

A quirk/gotcha of for i, x in enumerate(seq) when seq is empty Alex Willmer <alex@moreati.org.uk> - 2012-02-23 16:30 -0800
  Re: A quirk/gotcha of for i, x in enumerate(seq) when seq is empty Steven D'Aprano <steve+comp.lang.python@pearwood.info> - 2012-02-24 01:08 +0000
    Re: A quirk/gotcha of for i, x in enumerate(seq) when seq is empty Ethan Furman <ethan@stoneleaf.us> - 2012-02-23 19:49 -0800
    Re: A quirk/gotcha of for i, x in enumerate(seq) when seq is empty Mark Lawrence <breamoreboy@yahoo.co.uk> - 2012-02-24 07:10 +0000
    Re: A quirk/gotcha of for i, x in enumerate(seq) when seq is empty Peter Otten <__peter__@web.de> - 2012-02-24 09:44 +0100
  Re: A quirk/gotcha of for i, x in enumerate(seq) when seq is empty Paul Rubin <no.email@nospam.invalid> - 2012-02-23 17:21 -0800
  Re: A quirk/gotcha of for i, x in enumerate(seq) when seq is empty Rick Johnson <rantingrickjohnson@gmail.com> - 2012-02-24 04:32 -0800
    Re: A quirk/gotcha of for i, x in enumerate(seq) when seq is empty Peter Otten <__peter__@web.de> - 2012-02-24 13:44 +0100
      Re: A quirk/gotcha of for i, x in enumerate(seq) when seq is empty Peter Otten <__peter__@web.de> - 2012-02-24 14:14 +0100
      Re: A quirk/gotcha of for i, x in enumerate(seq) when seq is empty Steven D'Aprano <steve+comp.lang.python@pearwood.info> - 2012-02-24 14:54 +0000
        Re: A quirk/gotcha of for i, x in enumerate(seq) when seq is empty Arnaud Delobelle <arnodel@gmail.com> - 2012-02-24 15:00 +0000
        Re: A quirk/gotcha of for i, x in enumerate(seq) when seq is empty Peter Otten <__peter__@web.de> - 2012-02-24 16:16 +0100
        Re: A quirk/gotcha of for i, x in enumerate(seq) when seq is empty Rick Johnson <rantingrickjohnson@gmail.com> - 2012-02-28 14:56 -0800
          Re: A quirk/gotcha of for i, x in enumerate(seq) when seq is empty Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2012-02-29 10:24 +1100
            Re: A quirk/gotcha of for i, x in enumerate(seq) when seq is empty Steven D'Aprano <steve+comp.lang.python@pearwood.info> - 2012-02-29 00:18 +0000

csiph-web