Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > comp.lang.python > #109519

Re: Operator precedence problem

Path csiph.com!fu-berlin.de!uni-berlin.de!not-for-mail
From Random832 <random832@fastmail.com>
Newsgroups comp.lang.python
Subject Re: Operator precedence problem
Date Sun, 05 Jun 2016 13:19:33 -0400
Lines 12
Message-ID <mailman.11.1465147176.2306.python-list@python.org> (permalink)
References <816c651a-d0ae-4e23-a5b2-72a8f7398468@googlegroups.com> <1465147173.2666461.628499265.4DB6AD8F@webmail.messagingengine.com>
Mime-Version 1.0
Content-Type text/plain
Content-Transfer-Encoding 7bit
X-Trace news.uni-berlin.de RpirFgpqyHNU6jWx9iH3zQeNzOR6kudNbdN2pKTi0OJQ==
Return-Path <random832@fastmail.com>
X-Original-To python-list@python.org
Delivered-To python-list@mail.python.org
X-Spam-Status OK 0.026
X-Spam-Evidence '*H*': 0.95; '*S*': 0.00; 'operator': 0.03; 'received:internal': 0.09; 'message- id:@webmail.messagingengine.com': 0.16; 'received:10.202': 0.16; 'received:10.202.2': 0.16; 'received:10.202.2.212': 0.16; 'received:66.111': 0.16; 'received:66.111.4': 0.16; 'received:io': 0.16; 'received:messagingengine.com': 0.16; 'received:psf.io': 0.16; 'wrote:': 0.16; '>>>': 0.20; 'subject:problem': 0.22; 'elements': 0.23; 'header:In-Reply-To:1': 0.24; 'evaluation': 0.36; 'to:addr:python-list': 0.36; 'subject:: ': 0.37; 'received:10': 0.37; 'two': 0.37; 'received:66': 0.38; 'means': 0.39; 'why': 0.39; 'to:addr:python.org': 0.40; 'where': 0.40; 'header:Message-Id:1': 0.61; 'side': 0.62; 'more': 0.63; 'different': 0.63; 'here': 0.66; '512': 0.84; 'ict': 0.84
DKIM-Signature v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=fastmail.com; h= content-transfer-encoding:content-type:date:from:in-reply-to :message-id:mime-version:references:subject:to:x-sasl-enc :x-sasl-enc; s=mesmtp; bh=nDnjzxmpTbD88lappIXb/59Yga0=; b=4F7bnL trDB2i5OgxHoJwOS6tgpfJRxuEjiLcHJ5J4a/4mthjh4gLgLBY4vnhXSACxu/XVV hjOCvdRmmb7iJ0w0ug6GqRbLvuuKkycjq49JLN+YKMeDS5t/aBNFqUdCVR8XZ3uQ pPObAftcJnMgFM7Zd+k3xhea+SwEMmIcD0yP0=
DKIM-Signature v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=content-transfer-encoding:content-type :date:from:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version:references :subject:to:x-sasl-enc:x-sasl-enc; s=smtpout; bh=nDnjzxmpTbD88la ppIXb/59Yga0=; b=fl5mtsf+mQSKmt/ifiWdrqxRPKo+2u+0JvHjeLT+n9q0xFx HKVM2R0dWT2cJxc83XHmFLY8z65hA6hvvfwdU9CWg3ybXJaCR0BM0RH/1kE1z/Tm 3TIdc6fTZoUIk3OmEMkDmERX0CTotEbexSWv5UhR1VZgxBv1WrTI1rFL0YAw=
X-Sasl-Enc QByxTzZysb2S13NvNqkSRL3pvs1KotXxp712+hui1w2I 1465147173
X-Mailer MessagingEngine.com Webmail Interface - ajax-2bd3df2b
In-Reply-To <816c651a-d0ae-4e23-a5b2-72a8f7398468@googlegroups.com>
X-BeenThere python-list@python.org
X-Mailman-Version 2.1.22
Precedence list
List-Id General discussion list for the Python programming language <python-list.python.org>
List-Unsubscribe <https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-list>, <mailto:python-list-request@python.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive <http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-list/>
List-Post <mailto:python-list@python.org>
List-Help <mailto:python-list-request@python.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe <https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list>, <mailto:python-list-request@python.org?subject=subscribe>
X-Mailman-Original-Message-ID <1465147173.2666461.628499265.4DB6AD8F@webmail.messagingengine.com>
X-Mailman-Original-References <816c651a-d0ae-4e23-a5b2-72a8f7398468@googlegroups.com>
Xref csiph.com comp.lang.python:109519

Show key headers only | View raw

On Sun, Jun 5, 2016, at 02:53, ICT Ezy wrote:
> >>> 2 ** 3 ** 2 
> Answer is 512
> Why not 64?
> Order is right-left or left-right?

You're mixing up order of evaluation with operator associativity. The **
operator is right-to-left associative, this means x ** y ** z == x ** (y
** z). Evaluation is left to right, where it matters [i.e. if one or
more of the elements here were an expression with side effects]: first x
is evaluated, then tmp=y**z, then x**tmp. These are two entirely
different concepts.

Back to comp.lang.python | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

Operator precedence problem ICT Ezy <ictezy@gmail.com> - 2016-06-04 23:53 -0700
  Re: Operator precedence problem Peter Otten <__peter__@web.de> - 2016-06-05 09:35 +0200
    Re: Operator precedence problem ICT Ezy <ictezy@gmail.com> - 2016-06-05 08:05 -0700
      Re: Operator precedence problem Uri Even-Chen <uri@speedy.net> - 2016-06-05 19:05 +0300
        Re: Operator precedence problem ICT Ezy <ictezy@gmail.com> - 2016-06-05 20:24 -0700
        Re: Operator precedence problem Lawrence D’Oliveiro <lawrencedo99@gmail.com> - 2016-06-05 22:46 -0700
          Re: Operator precedence problem Random832 <random832@fastmail.com> - 2016-06-06 09:57 -0400
            Re: Operator precedence problem Marko Rauhamaa <marko@pacujo.net> - 2016-06-06 17:22 +0300
              Re: Operator precedence problem Random832 <random832@fastmail.com> - 2016-06-06 10:35 -0400
                Re: Operator precedence problem Marko Rauhamaa <marko@pacujo.net> - 2016-06-06 17:55 +0300
              Re: Operator precedence problem Jon Ribbens <jon+usenet@unequivocal.co.uk> - 2016-06-06 15:03 +0000
                Re: Operator precedence problem Marko Rauhamaa <marko@pacujo.net> - 2016-06-06 18:22 +0300
                Re: Operator precedence problem Jon Ribbens <jon+usenet@unequivocal.co.uk> - 2016-06-06 15:27 +0000
                Re: Operator precedence problem Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2016-06-07 01:57 +1000
                Re: Operator precedence problem Jon Ribbens <jon+usenet@unequivocal.co.uk> - 2016-06-06 16:05 +0000
                Re: Operator precedence problem Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2016-06-07 02:21 +1000
                Re: Operator precedence problem Jon Ribbens <jon+usenet@unequivocal.co.uk> - 2016-06-06 17:02 +0000
                Re: Operator precedence problem Grant Edwards <grant.b.edwards@gmail.com> - 2016-06-06 16:51 +0000
              Re: Operator precedence problem Peter Otten <__peter__@web.de> - 2016-06-06 18:38 +0200
            Re: Operator precedence problem Steven D'Aprano <steve@pearwood.info> - 2016-06-07 03:07 +1000
              Re: Operator precedence problem Random832 <random832@fastmail.com> - 2016-06-06 14:44 -0400
                Re: Operator precedence problem Marko Rauhamaa <marko@pacujo.net> - 2016-06-06 21:49 +0300
              Re: Operator precedence problem MRAB <python@mrabarnett.plus.com> - 2016-06-06 20:17 +0100
                Re: Operator precedence problem Gregory Ewing <greg.ewing@canterbury.ac.nz> - 2016-06-07 11:27 +1200
            Re: Operator precedence problem Rustom Mody <rustompmody@gmail.com> - 2016-06-06 10:14 -0700
              Re: Operator precedence problem Ben Bacarisse <ben.usenet@bsb.me.uk> - 2016-06-06 21:09 +0100
      Re: Operator precedence problem Michael Torrie <torriem@gmail.com> - 2016-06-05 17:47 -0600
        Re: Operator precedence problem ICT Ezy <ictezy@gmail.com> - 2016-06-05 20:23 -0700
  Re: Operator precedence problem Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2016-06-06 02:24 +1000
    Re: Operator precedence problem Peter Pearson <pkpearson@nowhere.invalid> - 2016-06-06 16:58 +0000
      Re: Operator precedence problem Gregory Ewing <greg.ewing@canterbury.ac.nz> - 2016-06-07 11:21 +1200
  Re: Operator precedence problem Random832 <random832@fastmail.com> - 2016-06-05 13:19 -0400
    Re: Operator precedence problem ICT Ezy <ictezy@gmail.com> - 2016-06-05 20:23 -0700
  Re: Operator precedence problem Gary Herron <gherron@digipen.edu> - 2016-06-05 00:04 -0700

csiph-web