Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > comp.lang.python > #73101

Re: First time I looked at Python was(...)

Path csiph.com!v102.xanadu-bbs.net!xanadu-bbs.net!feeder.erje.net!eu.feeder.erje.net!newsfeed.xs4all.nl!newsfeed1.news.xs4all.nl!xs4all!post.news.xs4all.nl!not-for-mail
Return-Path <carlos@premium-sponsor.com>
X-Original-To python-list@python.org
Delivered-To python-list@mail.python.org
X-Spam-Status OK 0.181
X-Spam-Level *
X-Spam-Evidence '*H*': 0.64; '*S*': 0.00; 'subject:Python': 0.06; 'context': 0.07; 'naturally': 0.09; 'sentence': 0.09; 'skip:/ 10': 0.09; 'solution,': 0.09; 'received:localdomain': 0.11; 'wrote': 0.14; 'convey': 0.16; 'dots': 0.16; 'ellipses': 0.16; 'example)': 0.16; 'garbage': 0.16; 'language?': 0.16; 'maternal': 0.16; 'language': 0.16; 'wrote:': 0.18; 'trying': 0.19; 'thoughts': 0.19; '>>>': 0.22; 'header:User-Agent:1': 0.23; 'certainly': 0.24; 'script': 0.25; 'order.': 0.26; 'tables': 0.26; 'header:In-Reply- To:1': 0.27; 'am,': 0.29; 'possibility': 0.29; "i'm": 0.30; '>>>>': 0.31; 'about.': 0.31; 'bunch': 0.31; 'complete,': 0.31; 'consequence': 0.31; 'explained': 0.31; 'anyone': 0.31; 'guess': 0.33; 'subject:time': 0.33; 'problem': 0.35; "can't": 0.35; 'there': 0.35; 'described': 0.36; 'doubt': 0.36; 'done': 0.36; 'too': 0.37; 'clear': 0.37; 'received:76': 0.38; 'to:addr:python- list': 0.38; 'pm,': 0.38; 'explain': 0.39; 'to:addr:python.org': 0.39; 'enough': 0.39; 'how': 0.40; 'even': 0.60; 'skip:u 10': 0.60; 'logs': 0.60; 'tell': 0.60; 'completed': 0.61; "you're": 0.61; 'you.': 0.62; "you'll": 0.62; "you've": 0.63; 'information': 0.63; 'kind': 0.63; 'our': 0.64; 'more': 0.64; 'great': 0.65; 'account': 0.65; 'talking': 0.65; 'capable': 0.67; 'dont': 0.67; 'header:Reply-To:1': 0.67; 'natural': 0.68; 'exceed': 0.68; 'wish': 0.70; 'reply-to:no real name:2**0': 0.71; 'therefore': 0.72; 'subject:First': 0.74; '...all': 0.84; 'are...': 0.84; 'batchelder': 0.84; 'coherent': 0.84; 'dias': 0.84; 'loose': 0.84; 'carlos': 0.91; 'edwards': 0.91; 'you...': 0.96
Date Tue, 10 Jun 2014 15:30:31 +0100
From Carlos Anselmo Dias <carlos@premium-sponsor.com>
User-Agent Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux i686; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.5.0
MIME-Version 1.0
To python-list@python.org
Subject Re: First time I looked at Python was(...)
References <mailman.10935.1402347279.18130.python-list@python.org> <TTAlv.318930$H24.262498@fx05.am4> <5396ECF4.4070102@premium-sponsor.com> <854mzt0xud.fsf@benfinney.id.au> <mailman.10947.1402403995.18130.python-list@python.org> <ln72aa$d1o$1@reader1.panix.com> <53970F2D.1040200@premium-sponsor.com> <ln73eq$1fc$1@ger.gmane.org> <mailman.10952.1402409889.18130.python-list@python.org> <f25eac3e-f269-44b1-8e06-5d3cded583af@googlegroups.com>
In-Reply-To <f25eac3e-f269-44b1-8e06-5d3cded583af@googlegroups.com>
Content-Type multipart/alternative; boundary="------------030203050500050702080808"
X-BeenThere python-list@python.org
X-Mailman-Version 2.1.15
Precedence list
Reply-To carlos@premium-sponsor.com
List-Id General discussion list for the Python programming language <python-list.python.org>
List-Unsubscribe <https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-list>, <mailto:python-list-request@python.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive <http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-list/>
List-Post <mailto:python-list@python.org>
List-Help <mailto:python-list-request@python.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe <https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list>, <mailto:python-list-request@python.org?subject=subscribe>
Newsgroups comp.lang.python
Message-ID <mailman.10954.1402410637.18130.python-list@python.org> (permalink)
Lines 224
NNTP-Posting-Host 2001:888:2000:d::a6
X-Trace 1402410637 news.xs4all.nl 2934 [2001:888:2000:d::a6]:47067
X-Complaints-To abuse@xs4all.nl
Xref csiph.com comp.lang.python:73101

Show key headers only | View raw


[Multipart message — attachments visible in raw view] - view raw

On 06/10/2014 03:24 PM, Rustom Mody wrote:
> On Tuesday, June 10, 2014 7:48:05 PM UTC+5:30, Carlos Anselmo Dias wrote:
>> On 06/10/2014 03:07 PM, Ned Batchelder wrote:
>>> On 6/10/14 9:59 AM, Carlos Anselmo Dias wrote:
>>>> On 06/10/2014 02:47 PM, Grant Edwards wrote:
>>>>> On 2014-06-10, Carlos Anselmo Dias  wrote:
>>>>>> English is not my maternal language ...
>>>>> And stringing together a bunch of phrases with elipses without every
>>>>> completing a sentence is the way things are done in your native
>>>>> language?
>>>>> I doubt it.
>>>> Hi ...
>>>> Those are my phrases ... somehow describe the projects(briefly) ... I
>>>> even provided you/people(...) one script to help exceed 'the freeze' of
>>>> thinking about n millions of tables or billions of files(for example)
>>>> ... I even explained the context ...
>>>> If that's not enough ... for those capable I guess it's enough to start
>>>> the necessary will to do it ...
>>>> If you want me to place phrases without elipses and completing one
>>>> sentence, 'I'm not there' ...
>>>> When you talk naturally about things(and that kind of things) sentences
>>>> and elipses are natural , are one consequence of your thoughts ... you
>>>> just adapt your thoughts to people capable of understading, those who
>>>> are not capable, you avoid the issues ...
>>>> (...)
>>>> Best regards,
>>>> Carlos
>>> Carlos, you've been told by a number of people that we don't know what
>>> you are talking about.  Dots don't convey any meaning.  Write
>>> complete, clear sentences that explain what you want.
>>> I don't know what you are trying to accomplish here.  I can tell you
>>> what you are accomplishing: you're convincing a number of people that
>>> you can't put your thoughts into coherent order.
>> Hi...
>> OK, therefore if my will to resume briefly can't accomplish your
>> capacity to understand we have one problem of communication ...
>> If your capacity to understand is one consequence of ellipses or
>> sentences not completed you'll have the possibility to understand better
>> if you've the will to do it ...
> You misunderstand...
> ...ALl ... we understand... are... the...
> ...
> ...
> ellipses
>
> For the rest...
> ...
> ...
>
> Its just garbage
>
>> Don't panic or don't loose too much time thinking about what I wrote ...
>> think about it in your head
> Dont fear on our account
>
>
>> ... if you have the will to ...
> Unfortunately there you have failed.
> You have not evoked in anyone a wish to be enthusiastic about what you
> are enthusiastic...
> ... ... ...
> Because...
> ... ... ... ... ...
> You... refuse...
>
> To communicate

Hi ...

That's great and you're one person with enough /Intelligence/ to 
participate in the projects I described you.
You can think about the solution, logs , how the information is 
organized,etc.
"You're certainly one of the persons!"

I'm not writing more ...

Back to comp.lang.python | Previous | NextPrevious in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

First time I looked at Python was(...) Carlos Anselmo Dias <carlos@premium-sponsor.com> - 2014-06-09 21:54 +0100
  Re: First time I looked at Python was(...) alister <alister.nospam.ware@ntlworld.com> - 2014-06-10 10:14 +0000
    Re: First time I looked at Python was(...) Robin Becker <robin@reportlab.com> - 2014-06-10 11:53 +0100
      Re: First time I looked at Python was(...) alister <alister.nospam.ware@ntlworld.com> - 2014-06-10 13:17 +0000
    Re: First time I looked at Python was(...) Carlos Anselmo Dias <carlos@premium-sponsor.com> - 2014-06-10 12:33 +0100
    Re: First time I looked at Python was(...) Ben Finney <ben@benfinney.id.au> - 2014-06-10 22:10 +1000
    Re: First time I looked at Python was(...) Carlos Anselmo Dias <carlos@premium-sponsor.com> - 2014-06-10 13:39 +0100
      Re: First time I looked at Python was(...) alister <alister.nospam.ware@ntlworld.com> - 2014-06-10 12:47 +0000
        Re: First time I looked at Python was(...) Carlos Anselmo Dias <carlos@premium-sponsor.com> - 2014-06-10 14:09 +0100
          Re: First time I looked at Python was(...) alister <alister.nospam.ware@ntlworld.com> - 2014-06-10 13:16 +0000
            Re: First time I looked at Python was(...) Carlos Anselmo Dias <carlos@premium-sponsor.com> - 2014-06-10 14:25 +0100
              Re: First time I looked at Python was(...) Rustom Mody <rustompmody@gmail.com> - 2014-06-10 06:38 -0700
                Re: First time I looked at Python was(...) Carlos Anselmo Dias <carlos@premium-sponsor.com> - 2014-06-10 14:43 +0100
      Re: First time I looked at Python was(...) Grant Edwards <invalid@invalid.invalid> - 2014-06-10 13:47 +0000
        Re: First time I looked at Python was(...) Carlos Anselmo Dias <carlos@premium-sponsor.com> - 2014-06-10 14:59 +0100
          Re: First time I looked at Python was(...) alister <alister.nospam.ware@ntlworld.com> - 2014-06-10 14:17 +0000
        Re: First time I looked at Python was(...) Ned Batchelder <ned@nedbatchelder.com> - 2014-06-10 10:07 -0400
        Re: First time I looked at Python was(...) Carlos Anselmo Dias <carlos@premium-sponsor.com> - 2014-06-10 15:18 +0100
          Re: First time I looked at Python was(...) Rustom Mody <rustompmody@gmail.com> - 2014-06-10 07:24 -0700
            Re: First time I looked at Python was(...) Carlos Anselmo Dias <carlos@premium-sponsor.com> - 2014-06-10 15:30 +0100
            Re: First time I looked at Python was(...) Søren <sd@syntonetic.com> - 2014-06-10 16:57 +0200
            Re: First time I looked at Python was(...) Carlos Anselmo Dias <carlos@premium-sponsor.com> - 2014-06-10 16:34 +0100
            Re: First time I looked at Python was(...) Carlos Anselmo Dias <carlos@premium-sponsor.com> - 2014-06-10 18:19 +0100
            Re: First time I looked at Python was(...) Terry Reedy <tjreedy@udel.edu> - 2014-06-10 15:57 -0400
            Re: First time I looked at Python was(...) Carlos Anselmo Dias <carlos@premium-sponsor.com> - 2014-06-10 21:07 +0100
            Re: First time I looked at Python was(...) leo kirotawa <kirotawa@gmail.com> - 2014-06-10 17:41 -0300
              Re: First time I looked at Python was(...) Mark H Harris <harrismh777@gmail.com> - 2014-06-10 16:32 -0500
                Re: First time I looked at Python was(...) Carlos Anselmo Dias <carlos@premium-sponsor.com> - 2014-06-10 22:46 +0100
              Re: First time I looked at Python was(...) Mark H Harris <harrismh777@gmail.com> - 2014-06-10 16:32 -0500
            Re: First time I looked at Python was(...) Carlos Anselmo Dias <carlos@premium-sponsor.com> - 2014-06-10 21:43 +0100
            Re: First time I looked at Python was(...) Carlos Anselmo Dias <carlos@premium-sponsor.com> - 2014-06-10 21:45 +0100
            Re: First time I looked at Python was(...) Mark Lawrence <breamoreboy@yahoo.co.uk> - 2014-06-10 21:51 +0100
            Re: First time I looked at Python was(...) Larry Martell <larry.martell@gmail.com> - 2014-06-10 16:53 -0400
            Re: First time I looked at Python was(...) Carlos Anselmo Dias <carlos@premium-sponsor.com> - 2014-06-10 22:15 +0100
              Re: First time I looked at Python was(...) alister <alister.nospam.ware@ntlworld.com> - 2014-06-11 08:34 +0000
                Re: First time I looked at Python was(...) Carlos Anselmo Dias <carlos@premium-sponsor.com> - 2014-06-11 10:16 +0100
            Re: First time I looked at Python was(...) Carlos Anselmo Dias <carlos@premium-sponsor.com> - 2014-06-11 10:23 +0100
            My last message(...) Carlos Anselmo Dias <carlos@premium-sponsor.com> - 2014-06-11 14:28 +0100
        Re: First time I looked at Python was(...) Joel Goldstick <joel.goldstick@gmail.com> - 2014-06-10 10:18 -0400
  Re: First time I looked at Python was(...) Mark H Harris <harrismh777@gmail.com> - 2014-06-10 09:39 -0500
    Re: First time I looked at Python was(...) Shiyao Ma <i@introo.me> - 2014-06-10 23:09 +0800
    Re: First time I looked at Python was(...) Carlos Anselmo Dias <carlos@premium-sponsor.com> - 2014-06-10 16:16 +0100
    Re: First time I looked at Python was(...) Carlos Anselmo Dias <carlos@premium-sponsor.com> - 2014-06-10 15:56 +0100

csiph-web