Path: csiph.com!v102.xanadu-bbs.net!xanadu-bbs.net!feeder.erje.net!eu.feeder.erje.net!newsfeed.xs4all.nl!newsfeed1.news.xs4all.nl!xs4all!post.news.xs4all.nl!not-for-mail Return-Path: X-Original-To: python-list@python.org Delivered-To: python-list@mail.python.org X-Spam-Status: OK 0.181 X-Spam-Level: * X-Spam-Evidence: '*H*': 0.64; '*S*': 0.00; 'subject:Python': 0.06; 'context': 0.07; 'naturally': 0.09; 'sentence': 0.09; 'skip:/ 10': 0.09; 'solution,': 0.09; 'received:localdomain': 0.11; 'wrote': 0.14; 'convey': 0.16; 'dots': 0.16; 'ellipses': 0.16; 'example)': 0.16; 'garbage': 0.16; 'language?': 0.16; 'maternal': 0.16; 'language': 0.16; 'wrote:': 0.18; 'trying': 0.19; 'thoughts': 0.19; '>>>': 0.22; 'header:User-Agent:1': 0.23; 'certainly': 0.24; 'script': 0.25; 'order.': 0.26; 'tables': 0.26; 'header:In-Reply- To:1': 0.27; 'am,': 0.29; 'possibility': 0.29; "i'm": 0.30; '>>>>': 0.31; 'about.': 0.31; 'bunch': 0.31; 'complete,': 0.31; 'consequence': 0.31; 'explained': 0.31; 'anyone': 0.31; 'guess': 0.33; 'subject:time': 0.33; 'problem': 0.35; "can't": 0.35; 'there': 0.35; 'described': 0.36; 'doubt': 0.36; 'done': 0.36; 'too': 0.37; 'clear': 0.37; 'received:76': 0.38; 'to:addr:python- list': 0.38; 'pm,': 0.38; 'explain': 0.39; 'to:addr:python.org': 0.39; 'enough': 0.39; 'how': 0.40; 'even': 0.60; 'skip:u 10': 0.60; 'logs': 0.60; 'tell': 0.60; 'completed': 0.61; "you're": 0.61; 'you.': 0.62; "you'll": 0.62; "you've": 0.63; 'information': 0.63; 'kind': 0.63; 'our': 0.64; 'more': 0.64; 'great': 0.65; 'account': 0.65; 'talking': 0.65; 'capable': 0.67; 'dont': 0.67; 'header:Reply-To:1': 0.67; 'natural': 0.68; 'exceed': 0.68; 'wish': 0.70; 'reply-to:no real name:2**0': 0.71; 'therefore': 0.72; 'subject:First': 0.74; '...all': 0.84; 'are...': 0.84; 'batchelder': 0.84; 'coherent': 0.84; 'dias': 0.84; 'loose': 0.84; 'carlos': 0.91; 'edwards': 0.91; 'you...': 0.96 Date: Tue, 10 Jun 2014 15:30:31 +0100 From: Carlos Anselmo Dias User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux i686; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.5.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: python-list@python.org Subject: Re: First time I looked at Python was(...) References: <5396ECF4.4070102@premium-sponsor.com> <854mzt0xud.fsf@benfinney.id.au> <53970F2D.1040200@premium-sponsor.com> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="------------030203050500050702080808" X-BeenThere: python-list@python.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list Reply-To: carlos@premium-sponsor.com List-Id: General discussion list for the Python programming language List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Newsgroups: comp.lang.python Message-ID: Lines: 224 NNTP-Posting-Host: 2001:888:2000:d::a6 X-Trace: 1402410637 news.xs4all.nl 2934 [2001:888:2000:d::a6]:47067 X-Complaints-To: abuse@xs4all.nl Xref: csiph.com comp.lang.python:73101 This is a multi-part message in MIME format. --------------030203050500050702080808 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On 06/10/2014 03:24 PM, Rustom Mody wrote: > On Tuesday, June 10, 2014 7:48:05 PM UTC+5:30, Carlos Anselmo Dias wrote: >> On 06/10/2014 03:07 PM, Ned Batchelder wrote: >>> On 6/10/14 9:59 AM, Carlos Anselmo Dias wrote: >>>> On 06/10/2014 02:47 PM, Grant Edwards wrote: >>>>> On 2014-06-10, Carlos Anselmo Dias wrote: >>>>>> English is not my maternal language ... >>>>> And stringing together a bunch of phrases with elipses without every >>>>> completing a sentence is the way things are done in your native >>>>> language? >>>>> I doubt it. >>>> Hi ... >>>> Those are my phrases ... somehow describe the projects(briefly) ... I >>>> even provided you/people(...) one script to help exceed 'the freeze' of >>>> thinking about n millions of tables or billions of files(for example) >>>> ... I even explained the context ... >>>> If that's not enough ... for those capable I guess it's enough to start >>>> the necessary will to do it ... >>>> If you want me to place phrases without elipses and completing one >>>> sentence, 'I'm not there' ... >>>> When you talk naturally about things(and that kind of things) sentences >>>> and elipses are natural , are one consequence of your thoughts ... you >>>> just adapt your thoughts to people capable of understading, those who >>>> are not capable, you avoid the issues ... >>>> (...) >>>> Best regards, >>>> Carlos >>> Carlos, you've been told by a number of people that we don't know what >>> you are talking about. Dots don't convey any meaning. Write >>> complete, clear sentences that explain what you want. >>> I don't know what you are trying to accomplish here. I can tell you >>> what you are accomplishing: you're convincing a number of people that >>> you can't put your thoughts into coherent order. >> Hi... >> OK, therefore if my will to resume briefly can't accomplish your >> capacity to understand we have one problem of communication ... >> If your capacity to understand is one consequence of ellipses or >> sentences not completed you'll have the possibility to understand better >> if you've the will to do it ... > You misunderstand... > ...ALl ... we understand... are... the... > ... > ... > ellipses > > For the rest... > ... > ... > > Its just garbage > >> Don't panic or don't loose too much time thinking about what I wrote ... >> think about it in your head > Dont fear on our account > > >> ... if you have the will to ... > Unfortunately there you have failed. > You have not evoked in anyone a wish to be enthusiastic about what you > are enthusiastic... > ... ... ... > Because... > ... ... ... ... ... > You... refuse... > > To communicate Hi ... That's great and you're one person with enough /Intelligence/ to participate in the projects I described you. You can think about the solution, logs , how the information is organized,etc. "You're certainly one of the persons!" I'm not writing more ... --------------030203050500050702080808 Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
On 06/10/2014 03:24 PM, Rustom Mody wrote:
On Tuesday, June 10, 2014 7:48:05 PM UTC+5:30, Carlos Anselmo Dias wrote:

On 06/10/2014 03:07 PM, Ned Batchelder wrote:

On 6/10/14 9:59 AM, Carlos Anselmo Dias wrote:

On 06/10/2014 02:47 PM, Grant Edwards wrote:

On 2014-06-10, Carlos Anselmo Dias  wrote:

English is not my maternal language ...

And stringing together a bunch of phrases with elipses without every
completing a sentence is the way things are done in your native
language?
I doubt it.

Hi ...
Those are my phrases ... somehow describe the projects(briefly) ... I
even provided you/people(...) one script to help exceed 'the freeze' of
thinking about n millions of tables or billions of files(for example)
... I even explained the context ...
If that's not enough ... for those capable I guess it's enough to start
the necessary will to do it ...
If you want me to place phrases without elipses and completing one
sentence, 'I'm not there' ...
When you talk naturally about things(and that kind of things) sentences
and elipses are natural , are one consequence of your thoughts ... you
just adapt your thoughts to people capable of understading, those who
are not capable, you avoid the issues ...
(...)
Best regards,
Carlos

Carlos, you've been told by a number of people that we don't know what 
you are talking about.  Dots don't convey any meaning.  Write 
complete, clear sentences that explain what you want.
I don't know what you are trying to accomplish here.  I can tell you 
what you are accomplishing: you're convincing a number of people that 
you can't put your thoughts into coherent order.

Hi...


      

        
OK, therefore if my will to resume briefly can't accomplish your 
capacity to understand we have one problem of communication ...


      

      

      

        
If your capacity to understand is one consequence of ellipses or 
sentences not completed you'll have the possibility to understand better 
if you've the will to do it ...


      

      
You misunderstand...
...ALl ... we understand... are... the...
... 
...
ellipses

For the rest...
...
...

Its just garbage



      

        
Don't panic or don't loose too much time thinking about what I wrote ... 
think about it in your head


      

      
Dont fear on our account




      

        
... if you have the will to ...


      

      
Unfortunately there you have failed.
You have not evoked in anyone a wish to be enthusiastic about what you
are enthusiastic...
... ... ...
Because...
... ... ... ... ...
You... refuse...

To communicate


    

    

    Hi ...

    

    That's great and you're one person with enough Intelligence
    to participate in the projects I described you.

    You can think about the solution, logs , how the information is
    organized,etc.

    "You're certainly one of the persons!"

    

    I'm not writing more ...

    

  


--------------030203050500050702080808--