Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.lang.python > #22230
| Path | csiph.com!usenet.pasdenom.info!gegeweb.org!de-l.enfer-du-nord.net!feeder2.enfer-du-nord.net!newsfeed.eweka.nl!eweka.nl!feeder3.eweka.nl!newsfeed.xs4all.nl!newsfeed6.news.xs4all.nl!xs4all!newsgate.cistron.nl!newsgate.news.xs4all.nl!post.news.xs4all.nl!not-for-mail |
|---|---|
| Return-Path | <jackdied@gmail.com> |
| X-Original-To | python-list@python.org |
| Delivered-To | python-list@mail.python.org |
| X-Spam-Status | OK 0.160 |
| X-Spam-Level | * |
| X-Spam-Evidence | '*H*': 0.68; '*S*': 0.00; 'protocols': 0.09; 'cc:addr :python-list': 0.15; 'finney': 0.16; 'migrate': 0.16; 'roy': 0.16; 'that?': 0.18; 'thanks.': 0.21; 'wrote:': 0.21; 'header:In-Reply- To:1': 0.22; 'received:74.125.82.174': 0.25; 'cc:no real name:2**0': 0.26; 'message-id:@mail.gmail.com': 0.27; 'cc:addr:python.org': 0.27; 'seems': 0.28; '27,': 0.29; 'extent': 0.29; 'subject:skip:i 10': 0.29; "doesn't": 0.30; 'cc:2**0': 0.31; 'received:google.com': 0.32; 'received:74.125.82': 0.33; 'ben': 0.35; 'writes:': 0.35; 'actually': 0.35; 'received:74.125': 0.36; 'but': 0.36; 'does': 0.36; 'so,': 0.37; 'data': 0.38; 'think': 0.40; 'how': 0.40; 'mar': 0.61; 'choose': 0.61; 'identity': 0.63; 'different': 0.65; 'freedom': 0.66; '2012': 0.69; 'published': 0.74; 'article': 0.81; '12:24': 0.84; 'hostile': 0.91; 'trust,': 0.91 |
| DKIM-Signature | v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=wkQz5zWgMUIToV9qsKmkGiq1eFx1JVDUy4zPKzUbt/o=; b=Ts3Vnr7rVIOyJ8rvdkbjJ9I2P8YheUxqTBLVTMyw/vR2blRlwx8UunOs43FjfsHlmr O5FPiL5t2PoJ5iGoKKPP7c4ODxZTgd2iIWN2r8KoM+OPbiDaD17/ADE5JXkXcXLOTu18 DLIeHPUdLWj+c5QRDYofmSgwXDIyCJxlwLJv4u6WdLZTmV4Z5718vmhzgAqT4QayUn+f fAacdEaaHSunQnyTBdbqujh0HZk2RH8injd+gFIk70WHW6XCnVI3qPBCFdTrKFWgRxHS 5CRuU6ZQIVMqrboDVOi6DPAHnXEx0oa66aflYQsPil5dLaRZt+a/qHwBJrMJqRXAjMfn z4mA== |
| MIME-Version | 1.0 |
| In-Reply-To | <87zkb2fz7g.fsf@benfinney.id.au> |
| References | <1973354.3.1332816158529.JavaMail.geo-discussion-forums@pbae2> <87haxahh51.fsf@benfinney.id.au> <roy-E4EA5A.23301726032012@news.panix.com> <878vimhfdp.fsf@benfinney.id.au> <roy-2E9CB1.23571326032012@news.panix.com> <87zkb2fz7g.fsf@benfinney.id.au> |
| Date | Tue, 27 Mar 2012 01:24:16 -0400 |
| Subject | Re: OAuth 2.0 implementation |
| From | Jack Diederich <jackdied@gmail.com> |
| To | Ben Finney <ben+python@benfinney.id.au> |
| Content-Type | text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 |
| Content-Transfer-Encoding | quoted-printable |
| Cc | python-list@python.org |
| X-BeenThere | python-list@python.org |
| X-Mailman-Version | 2.1.12 |
| Precedence | list |
| List-Id | General discussion list for the Python programming language <python-list.python.org> |
| List-Unsubscribe | <http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-list>, <mailto:python-list-request@python.org?subject=unsubscribe> |
| List-Archive | <http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-list> |
| List-Post | <mailto:python-list@python.org> |
| List-Help | <mailto:python-list-request@python.org?subject=help> |
| List-Subscribe | <http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list>, <mailto:python-list-request@python.org?subject=subscribe> |
| Newsgroups | comp.lang.python |
| Message-ID | <mailman.1029.1332825858.3037.python-list@python.org> (permalink) |
| Lines | 23 |
| NNTP-Posting-Host | 2001:888:2000:d::a6 |
| X-Trace | 1332825858 news.xs4all.nl 6912 [2001:888:2000:d::a6]:51927 |
| X-Complaints-To | abuse@xs4all.nl |
| Xref | csiph.com comp.lang.python:22230 |
Show key headers only | View raw
On Tue, Mar 27, 2012 at 12:24 AM, Ben Finney <ben+python@benfinney.id.au> wrote: > Roy Smith <roy@panix.com> writes: > >> In article <878vimhfdp.fsf@benfinney.id.au>, >> Ben Finney <ben+python@benfinney.id.au> wrote: >> > So, if I want to be free to choose an identity provider I trust, and >> > it's not Facebook or Google or Twitter or other privacy-hostile >> > services, how does OAuth help me do that? >> >> It doesn't. Well, in theory, it could, but in practice everybody's >> OAuth implementation is different enough that they don't interoperate. > > Thanks. So OAuth is a pseudo-standard that is implemented incompatibly > to the extent that it doesn't actually give users the freedom to migrate > their existing data and identity at will to any other OAuth implementor? Pretty much. It is nice that it is published as a standard at all but the standard is just whatever people are actually doing. It seems less hostile when you think of it as vigorous documentation instead of protocols set in stone. -Jack
Back to comp.lang.python | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
OAuth 2.0 implementation Demian Brecht <demianbrecht@gmail.com> - 2012-03-26 19:42 -0700
Re: OAuth 2.0 implementation Ben Finney <ben+python@benfinney.id.au> - 2012-03-27 14:11 +1100
Re: OAuth 2.0 implementation Roy Smith <roy@panix.com> - 2012-03-26 23:30 -0400
Re: OAuth 2.0 implementation Ben Finney <ben+python@benfinney.id.au> - 2012-03-27 14:49 +1100
Re: OAuth 2.0 implementation Roy Smith <roy@panix.com> - 2012-03-26 23:57 -0400
Re: OAuth 2.0 implementation Ben Finney <ben+python@benfinney.id.au> - 2012-03-27 15:24 +1100
Re: OAuth 2.0 implementation Jack Diederich <jackdied@gmail.com> - 2012-03-27 01:24 -0400
Re: OAuth 2.0 implementation Demian Brecht <demianbrecht@gmail.com> - 2012-03-26 22:30 -0700
Re: OAuth 2.0 implementation Roy Smith <roy@panix.com> - 2012-03-27 10:18 -0400
Re: OAuth 2.0 implementation Demian Brecht <demianbrecht@gmail.com> - 2012-03-27 10:54 -0700
Re: OAuth 2.0 implementation Mark Hammond <skippy.hammond@gmail.com> - 2012-03-28 14:42 +1100
Re: OAuth 2.0 implementation Stuart Bishop <stuart@stuartbishop.net> - 2012-03-27 16:59 +0700
Socket Error : Address still in use (Conveting from python 1.5.2 to 2.7.1) Wong Wah Meng-R32813 <r32813@freescale.com> - 2012-03-27 09:41 +0000
Re: OAuth 2.0 implementation Roland Hedberg <roland@catalogix.se> - 2012-03-27 15:36 +0200
Re: OAuth 2.0 implementation Demian Brecht <demianbrecht@gmail.com> - 2012-07-05 07:06 -0700
Re: OAuth 2.0 implementation Alec Taylor <alec.taylor6@gmail.com> - 2012-07-06 01:19 +1000
Re: OAuth 2.0 implementation Demian Brecht <demianbrecht@gmail.com> - 2012-07-05 10:48 -0700
Re: OAuth 2.0 implementation Demian Brecht <demianbrecht@gmail.com> - 2012-07-05 10:48 -0700
Re: OAuth 2.0 implementation Demian Brecht <demianbrecht@gmail.com> - 2012-07-06 08:38 -0700
Re: OAuth 2.0 implementation Demian Brecht <demianbrecht@gmail.com> - 2012-07-06 08:38 -0700
Re: OAuth 2.0 implementation Alec Taylor <alec.taylor6@gmail.com> - 2012-07-07 04:41 +1000
RE: OAuth 2.0 implementation "Demian Brecht" <demianbrecht@gmail.com> - 2012-07-06 11:49 -0700
Re: OAuth 2.0 implementation Alec Taylor <alec.taylor6@gmail.com> - 2012-07-07 04:58 +1000
csiph-web