Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > comp.lang.python > #22198

Re: Question about collections.defaultdict

Show all headers | View raw

On 3/26/12 4:33 PM, Steven W. Orr wrote:
> On 3/26/2012 9:44 AM, Robert Kern wrote:
>> On 3/26/12 2:33 PM, Steven W. Orr wrote:
>>> I created a new class called CaseInsensitiveDict (by stealing from code I found
>>> on the web, thank you very much). The new class inherits from dict. It makes it
>>> so that if the key has a 'lower' method, it will always access the key using
>>> lower
>>>
>>> I'd like to change the place where I previously declared a dict
>>>
>>> self.lookup = defaultdict(list)
>>>
>>> so that the new code will allow this new dict to be used instead. But then I
>>> realized I may have painted myself into a small corner:
>>>
>>> Is there a way to use defaultdict so that I can override what *kind* of dict it
>>> will use?
>>
>> No.
>>
>>> I would like the value to still be a list be default, but it seems like I can't
>>> tell defaultdict to use *my* new dict.
>>>
>>> Do I give up on defaultdict?
>>
>> Assuming that your CaseInsensitiveDict subclasses from dict or UserDict, it's
>> relatively easy to make a subclass of your CaseInsensitiveDict act like a
>> defaultdict. Just implement the __missing__(key) method appropriately (and
>> modify the constructor to take the callable, of course).
>>
>> http://docs.python.org/library/stdtypes.html#dict
>> http://docs.python.org/library/collections.html#collections.defaultdict.__missing__
>>
>>
>>
>
> I'm not quite getting what you're telling me, but I'm sure you have the right
> idea. Here's the beginning of my class:
>
> class CaseInsensitiveDict(dict):
> def __init__(self, init=None):
> if isinstance(init, (dict, list, tuple)):
> for kk, vv in init.items():
> self[self.key_has_lower(kk)] = vv
>
>
> It sounds like you want me to subclass defaultdict to create something like this?
>
> class CaseInsensitiveDictDef(defaultdict):
> def __init__(self, init=None):
> super(CaseInsensitiveDictDef, self).__init__(list)
> self.__missing__ = list
>
> I think I'm way off base. I'm not clear on what the calling sequence is for
> defaultdict or how to get it to use my CaseInsensitiveDict instead of regular dict.
>
> Can you help?

You need to make a subclass of CaseInsensitiveDict, implement the 
__missing__(key) method, and override the __init__() method to take the factory 
function as an argument instead of data. defaultdict is just a subclass of dict 
that does this.


class CaseInsensitiveDictDef(CaseInsensitiveDict):
     def __init__(self, default_factory):
         super(CaseInsensitiveDictDef, self).__init__()
         self.default_factory = default_factory

     def __missing__(self, key):
         return self.default_factory()

-- 
Robert Kern

"I have come to believe that the whole world is an enigma, a harmless enigma
  that is made terrible by our own mad attempt to interpret it as though it had
  an underlying truth."
   -- Umberto Eco

Back to comp.lang.python | Previous | Next | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

Re: Question about collections.defaultdict Robert Kern <robert.kern@gmail.com> - 2012-03-26 16:52 +0100

csiph-web