Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > comp.lang.python > #109517

Re: Operator precedence problem

Path csiph.com!feeder.erje.net!2.eu.feeder.erje.net!newsfeed0.kamp.net!newsfeed.kamp.net!fu-berlin.de!uni-berlin.de!not-for-mail
From Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com>
Newsgroups comp.lang.python
Subject Re: Operator precedence problem
Date Mon, 6 Jun 2016 02:24:37 +1000
Lines 19
Message-ID <mailman.10.1465143880.2306.python-list@python.org> (permalink)
References <816c651a-d0ae-4e23-a5b2-72a8f7398468@googlegroups.com> <CAPTjJmoQKmhAWU0m9+xkd7SGG=UCVVuuxrdgDwG-wDeVNCLqpQ@mail.gmail.com>
Mime-Version 1.0
Content-Type text/plain; charset=UTF-8
X-Trace news.uni-berlin.de aYIstP5clvuVnv2dS73IFgUA/HBgQUhYwZIcPWs/MpNg==
Return-Path <rosuav@gmail.com>
X-Original-To python-list@python.org
Delivered-To python-list@mail.python.org
X-Spam-Status OK 0.094
X-Spam-Evidence '*H*': 0.82; '*S*': 0.01; 'cc:addr:python-list': 0.09; '2016': 0.16; 'from:addr:rosuav': 0.16; 'from:name:chris angelico': 0.16; 'received:io': 0.16; 'received:psf.io': 0.16; 'wrote:': 0.16; '>>>': 0.20; 'cc:2**0': 0.20; 'cc:addr:python.org': 0.20; '(the': 0.22; 'subject:problem': 0.22; 'header:In-Reply-To:1': 0.24; 'example': 0.26; 'message- id:@mail.gmail.com': 0.27; 'mathematical': 0.27; 'follows': 0.29; 'url:wikipedia': 0.29; 'url:wiki': 0.30; 'received:google.com': 0.35; 'received:74.125.82': 0.35; 'url:org': 0.36; 'pm,': 0.36; 'subject:: ': 0.37; 'why': 0.39; 'url:en': 0.39; 'your': 0.60; '.....': 0.76; 'hand': 0.82; '512': 0.84; 'chrisa': 0.84; 'ict': 0.84; 'received:74.125.82.47': 0.84; 'to:none': 0.91
DKIM-Signature v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:cc; bh=CWTZXdEXe886zhNMB2jigkdFqu7xh0p8Q3lI7uzwO1g=; b=XM5NFuhBm7GcOPdf7ozb2Kp8WpaY7IPTURU4OAxiU3ApZdJBlxk2ZXep0fhtVpBKIb 0dGpf2jDzzXagMy0XPy/pXQETtPm7ml92LM8nsEIXg2Rfd/Xh7A6AfAVlXpehmU84qnN 37IN9wDmtS6zKHPlVsi/2LSbIK24BYF6jM5HX5XGRQkBJRPiDOjBxPypYnC7bu0P9RGX M+e0NHqcbeJBQWwh8vFrD6UrPUuLsuDG0joUzaDrD/k+hRp8NOku9NtzAupEmb4M5COV LKNI53FAaQsxK6koSx6UoVMR9fwr1E94Pr4hV6aZulIx7lnKFPysaoMR1ij+oD724e+w jbmA==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:cc; bh=CWTZXdEXe886zhNMB2jigkdFqu7xh0p8Q3lI7uzwO1g=; b=FWGSnyVaDqHZ8XIcNev84x1JzqIE30n1US6HCzw4jX+DRuXpoQMW6xg3CAzX1WQpJU Hz2dXzq/fEstjGzWD5nDu1RHXhB0FbaD0Oq22/Ouyr893FqG+0ksE78zUWuL7EaboJAw 1/Wj4PN5tW4uatyR0NlnUBSePFCr0Oi8WXib6SD1wM9E17pyBDrIbvIphtHAbwV+fqOT IXDl4WzMJ34wvxJuNoP2DDISxApP9+pJa8ocuVroKT5923ysVFItJWYVFj8ZkQRAvI9S ejlFFsTLtASAtJLI5WzGzBetQ2ay3SrY80FKLM4Fx9zYPy4u2Q61Q3uxLnIHsPTyoaKq yx5A==
X-Gm-Message-State ALyK8tJ85uIqLUW6QD/w9baYLcVsnlcBcJLAw9gfGWRl5THXTfarIvUWzIRUJ1K5dh+0E8CR/N5D+JCfN84h6Q==
X-Received by 10.194.110.234 with SMTP id id10mr11787122wjb.30.1465143878168; Sun, 05 Jun 2016 09:24:38 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To <816c651a-d0ae-4e23-a5b2-72a8f7398468@googlegroups.com>
X-BeenThere python-list@python.org
X-Mailman-Version 2.1.22
Precedence list
List-Id General discussion list for the Python programming language <python-list.python.org>
List-Unsubscribe <https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-list>, <mailto:python-list-request@python.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive <http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-list/>
List-Post <mailto:python-list@python.org>
List-Help <mailto:python-list-request@python.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe <https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list>, <mailto:python-list-request@python.org?subject=subscribe>
X-Mailman-Original-Message-ID <CAPTjJmoQKmhAWU0m9+xkd7SGG=UCVVuuxrdgDwG-wDeVNCLqpQ@mail.gmail.com>
X-Mailman-Original-References <816c651a-d0ae-4e23-a5b2-72a8f7398468@googlegroups.com>
Xref csiph.com comp.lang.python:109517

Show key headers only | View raw


On Sun, Jun 5, 2016 at 4:53 PM, ICT Ezy <ictezy@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>> 2 ** 3 ** 2
> Answer is 512
> Why not 64?
> Order is right-left or left-right?

This example follows the mathematical standard; you start from the
"top" (the right hand side), and work your way down.

>>> (3**3) % 10
7
>>> (3**3**3) % 10
7
>>> (3**3**3**3) % 10
.... waiting......

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Graham%27s_number

ChrisA

Back to comp.lang.python | Previous | NextPrevious in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

Operator precedence problem ICT Ezy <ictezy@gmail.com> - 2016-06-04 23:53 -0700
  Re: Operator precedence problem Peter Otten <__peter__@web.de> - 2016-06-05 09:35 +0200
    Re: Operator precedence problem ICT Ezy <ictezy@gmail.com> - 2016-06-05 08:05 -0700
      Re: Operator precedence problem Uri Even-Chen <uri@speedy.net> - 2016-06-05 19:05 +0300
        Re: Operator precedence problem ICT Ezy <ictezy@gmail.com> - 2016-06-05 20:24 -0700
        Re: Operator precedence problem Lawrence D’Oliveiro <lawrencedo99@gmail.com> - 2016-06-05 22:46 -0700
          Re: Operator precedence problem Random832 <random832@fastmail.com> - 2016-06-06 09:57 -0400
            Re: Operator precedence problem Marko Rauhamaa <marko@pacujo.net> - 2016-06-06 17:22 +0300
              Re: Operator precedence problem Random832 <random832@fastmail.com> - 2016-06-06 10:35 -0400
                Re: Operator precedence problem Marko Rauhamaa <marko@pacujo.net> - 2016-06-06 17:55 +0300
              Re: Operator precedence problem Jon Ribbens <jon+usenet@unequivocal.co.uk> - 2016-06-06 15:03 +0000
                Re: Operator precedence problem Marko Rauhamaa <marko@pacujo.net> - 2016-06-06 18:22 +0300
                Re: Operator precedence problem Jon Ribbens <jon+usenet@unequivocal.co.uk> - 2016-06-06 15:27 +0000
                Re: Operator precedence problem Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2016-06-07 01:57 +1000
                Re: Operator precedence problem Jon Ribbens <jon+usenet@unequivocal.co.uk> - 2016-06-06 16:05 +0000
                Re: Operator precedence problem Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2016-06-07 02:21 +1000
                Re: Operator precedence problem Jon Ribbens <jon+usenet@unequivocal.co.uk> - 2016-06-06 17:02 +0000
                Re: Operator precedence problem Grant Edwards <grant.b.edwards@gmail.com> - 2016-06-06 16:51 +0000
              Re: Operator precedence problem Peter Otten <__peter__@web.de> - 2016-06-06 18:38 +0200
            Re: Operator precedence problem Steven D'Aprano <steve@pearwood.info> - 2016-06-07 03:07 +1000
              Re: Operator precedence problem Random832 <random832@fastmail.com> - 2016-06-06 14:44 -0400
                Re: Operator precedence problem Marko Rauhamaa <marko@pacujo.net> - 2016-06-06 21:49 +0300
              Re: Operator precedence problem MRAB <python@mrabarnett.plus.com> - 2016-06-06 20:17 +0100
                Re: Operator precedence problem Gregory Ewing <greg.ewing@canterbury.ac.nz> - 2016-06-07 11:27 +1200
            Re: Operator precedence problem Rustom Mody <rustompmody@gmail.com> - 2016-06-06 10:14 -0700
              Re: Operator precedence problem Ben Bacarisse <ben.usenet@bsb.me.uk> - 2016-06-06 21:09 +0100
      Re: Operator precedence problem Michael Torrie <torriem@gmail.com> - 2016-06-05 17:47 -0600
        Re: Operator precedence problem ICT Ezy <ictezy@gmail.com> - 2016-06-05 20:23 -0700
  Re: Operator precedence problem Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2016-06-06 02:24 +1000
    Re: Operator precedence problem Peter Pearson <pkpearson@nowhere.invalid> - 2016-06-06 16:58 +0000
      Re: Operator precedence problem Gregory Ewing <greg.ewing@canterbury.ac.nz> - 2016-06-07 11:21 +1200
  Re: Operator precedence problem Random832 <random832@fastmail.com> - 2016-06-05 13:19 -0400
    Re: Operator precedence problem ICT Ezy <ictezy@gmail.com> - 2016-06-05 20:23 -0700
  Re: Operator precedence problem Gary Herron <gherron@digipen.edu> - 2016-06-05 00:04 -0700

csiph-web