Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > comp.lang.python > #86693

Re: Python Worst Practices

Path csiph.com!usenet.pasdenom.info!news.redatomik.org!newsfeed.xs4all.nl!newsfeed1.news.xs4all.nl!xs4all!post.news.xs4all.nl!not-for-mail
Return-Path <python@mrabarnett.plus.com>
X-Original-To python-list@python.org
Delivered-To python-list@mail.python.org
X-Spam-Status OK 0.010
X-Spam-Evidence '*H*': 0.98; '*S*': 0.00; 'subject:Python': 0.06; 'interpreted': 0.09; 'python': 0.11; '16-bit': 0.16; '8-bit': 0.16; 'from:addr:mrabarnett.plus.com': 0.16; 'from:addr:python': 0.16; 'from:name:mrab': 0.16; 'interpreter,': 0.16; 'itself,': 0.16; 'language)': 0.16; 'message-id:@mrabarnett.plus.com': 0.16; 'processor,': 0.16; 'received:192.168.1.4': 0.16; 'received:84.93': 0.16; 'received:84.93.230': 0.16; 'space).': 0.16; 'language': 0.16; 'wrote:': 0.18; '(in': 0.22; 'header:User- Agent:1': 0.23; 'processor': 0.24; '(or': 0.24; 'switch': 0.26; 'header:In-Reply-To:1': 0.27; 'chris': 0.29; "i'm": 0.30; 'run': 0.32; 'bus': 0.33; 'could': 0.34; 'basic': 0.35; 'received:84': 0.35; 'but': 0.35; 'skip:> 10': 0.36; 'should': 0.36; 'performance': 0.37; 'to:addr:python-list': 0.38; 'ability': 0.39; 'sure': 0.39; 'to:addr:python.org': 0.39; 'first': 0.61; 'address': 0.63; 'more': 0.64; 'taking': 0.65; 'mar': 0.68; 'home': 0.69; 'felt': 0.74; '2015': 0.84; 'subject:Practices': 0.84
X-CM-Score 0.00
X-CNFS-Analysis v=2.1 cv=ZuBjKrLG c=1 sm=1 tr=0 a=0nF1XD0wxitMEM03M9B4ZQ==:117 a=0nF1XD0wxitMEM03M9B4ZQ==:17 a=0Bzu9jTXAAAA:8 a=mlFM_a_ONtUA:10 a=IkcTkHD0fZMA:10 a=EBOSESyhAAAA:8 a=pGLkceISAAAA:8 a=x8X48Uf88Axo9cbWgbAA:9 a=z2jDUUMg7B9stQHK:21 a=2uIKn1FAV7XeQuUU:21 a=QEXdDO2ut3YA:10
X-AUTH mrabarnett@:2500
Date Mon, 02 Mar 2015 01:59:27 +0000
From MRAB <python@mrabarnett.plus.com>
User-Agent Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.3; WOW64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.5.0
MIME-Version 1.0
To python-list@python.org
Subject Re: Python Worst Practices
References <mclca6$iie$1@ger.gmane.org> <7053A277-9687-49B0-9FDB-CB4DB3E76DEC@gmail.com> <54F0E38D.40006@davea.name> <CAPTjJmqTsB-of0JdJKW4BNW23DEpZ17353fHa9iBHfV8-3uANw@mail.gmail.com> <mailman.19334.1425137628.18130.python-list@python.org> <NinIw.894937$551.656196@fx43.am4> <54f274bb$0$13011$c3e8da3$5496439d@news.astraweb.com> <CAPTjJmoRiTb+gL8BVKHLzGCfPkjXjX1_jU_Osu2FYkUxjC0Aqg@mail.gmail.com> <mif7fadg0g1b276shsagrg2urvonfbbnd8@4ax.com>
In-Reply-To <mif7fadg0g1b276shsagrg2urvonfbbnd8@4ax.com>
Content-Type text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding 7bit
X-BeenThere python-list@python.org
X-Mailman-Version 2.1.19
Precedence list
List-Id General discussion list for the Python programming language <python-list.python.org>
List-Unsubscribe <https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-list>, <mailto:python-list-request@python.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive <http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-list/>
List-Post <mailto:python-list@python.org>
List-Help <mailto:python-list-request@python.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe <https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list>, <mailto:python-list-request@python.org?subject=subscribe>
Newsgroups comp.lang.python
Message-ID <mailman.10.1425261578.13471.python-list@python.org> (permalink)
Lines 18
NNTP-Posting-Host 2001:888:2000:d::a6
X-Trace 1425261579 news.xs4all.nl 2911 [2001:888:2000:d::a6]:38050
X-Complaints-To abuse@xs4all.nl
Xref csiph.com comp.lang.python:86693

Show key headers only | View raw

On 2015-03-02 01:37, Dennis Lee Bieber wrote:
> On Sun, 1 Mar 2015 13:43:50 +1100, Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com>
> declaimed the following:
>
>>losing performance. Conversely, I'm sure Python could also have been
>>implemented on top of BASIC if someone felt like it, though what the
>>advantages might be I have no idea. But performance is not (or should
>
> 	You'd be able to run it on a TI99/4 (in which the BASIC interpreter,
> itself, was run on an interpreter... nothing like taking the first "16-bit"
> home computer and shackling it with an interpreted language that was run on
> an interpreted language)
>
The "16-bit" CPU had a 16-bit address bus (64K address space). If you
were going to switch from an 8-bit processor to a 16-bit processor, one
of the pluses you'd be looking for would the ability to directly
address more than 64K.

Back to comp.lang.python | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

Re: Python Worst Practices Mark Lawrence <breamoreboy@yahoo.co.uk> - 2015-02-28 15:33 +0000
  Re: Python Worst Practices BartC <bc@freeuk.com> - 2015-02-28 17:55 +0000
    Re: Python Worst Practices Mark Lawrence <breamoreboy@yahoo.co.uk> - 2015-02-28 18:38 +0000
    Re: Python Worst Practices Steven D'Aprano <steve+comp.lang.python@pearwood.info> - 2015-03-01 13:08 +1100
      Re: Python Worst Practices Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2015-03-01 13:43 +1100
      Re: Python Worst Practices BartC <bc@freeuk.com> - 2015-03-01 12:47 +0000
      Re: Python Worst Practices Dennis Lee Bieber <wlfraed@ix.netcom.com> - 2015-03-01 20:37 -0500
      Re: Python Worst Practices MRAB <python@mrabarnett.plus.com> - 2015-03-02 01:59 +0000
      Re: Python Worst Practices Dave Angel <davea@davea.name> - 2015-03-01 23:49 -0500
      Re: Python Worst Practices MRAB <python@mrabarnett.plus.com> - 2015-03-02 12:38 +0000
      Re: Python Worst Practices Dave Angel <davea@davea.name> - 2015-03-02 08:12 -0500
      Re: Python Worst Practices Jonas Wielicki <jonas@wielicki.name> - 2015-03-06 07:58 +0100
      Re: Python Worst Practices Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2015-03-06 21:09 +1100
        Re: Python Worst Practices Mario Figueiredo <marfig@gmail.com> - 2015-03-07 16:11 +0100

csiph-web