Path: csiph.com!usenet.pasdenom.info!news.redatomik.org!newsfeed.xs4all.nl!newsfeed1.news.xs4all.nl!xs4all!post.news.xs4all.nl!not-for-mail Return-Path: X-Original-To: python-list@python.org Delivered-To: python-list@mail.python.org X-Spam-Status: OK 0.010 X-Spam-Evidence: '*H*': 0.98; '*S*': 0.00; 'subject:Python': 0.06; 'interpreted': 0.09; 'python': 0.11; '16-bit': 0.16; '8-bit': 0.16; 'from:addr:mrabarnett.plus.com': 0.16; 'from:addr:python': 0.16; 'from:name:mrab': 0.16; 'interpreter,': 0.16; 'itself,': 0.16; 'language)': 0.16; 'message-id:@mrabarnett.plus.com': 0.16; 'processor,': 0.16; 'received:192.168.1.4': 0.16; 'received:84.93': 0.16; 'received:84.93.230': 0.16; 'space).': 0.16; 'language': 0.16; 'wrote:': 0.18; '(in': 0.22; 'header:User- Agent:1': 0.23; 'processor': 0.24; '(or': 0.24; 'switch': 0.26; 'header:In-Reply-To:1': 0.27; 'chris': 0.29; "i'm": 0.30; 'run': 0.32; 'bus': 0.33; 'could': 0.34; 'basic': 0.35; 'received:84': 0.35; 'but': 0.35; 'skip:> 10': 0.36; 'should': 0.36; 'performance': 0.37; 'to:addr:python-list': 0.38; 'ability': 0.39; 'sure': 0.39; 'to:addr:python.org': 0.39; 'first': 0.61; 'address': 0.63; 'more': 0.64; 'taking': 0.65; 'mar': 0.68; 'home': 0.69; 'felt': 0.74; '2015': 0.84; 'subject:Practices': 0.84 X-CM-Score: 0.00 X-CNFS-Analysis: v=2.1 cv=ZuBjKrLG c=1 sm=1 tr=0 a=0nF1XD0wxitMEM03M9B4ZQ==:117 a=0nF1XD0wxitMEM03M9B4ZQ==:17 a=0Bzu9jTXAAAA:8 a=mlFM_a_ONtUA:10 a=IkcTkHD0fZMA:10 a=EBOSESyhAAAA:8 a=pGLkceISAAAA:8 a=x8X48Uf88Axo9cbWgbAA:9 a=z2jDUUMg7B9stQHK:21 a=2uIKn1FAV7XeQuUU:21 a=QEXdDO2ut3YA:10 X-AUTH: mrabarnett@:2500 Date: Mon, 02 Mar 2015 01:59:27 +0000 From: MRAB User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.3; WOW64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.5.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: python-list@python.org Subject: Re: Python Worst Practices References: <7053A277-9687-49B0-9FDB-CB4DB3E76DEC@gmail.com> <54F0E38D.40006@davea.name> <54f274bb$0$13011$c3e8da3$5496439d@news.astraweb.com> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-BeenThere: python-list@python.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.19 Precedence: list List-Id: General discussion list for the Python programming language List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Newsgroups: comp.lang.python Message-ID: Lines: 18 NNTP-Posting-Host: 2001:888:2000:d::a6 X-Trace: 1425261579 news.xs4all.nl 2911 [2001:888:2000:d::a6]:38050 X-Complaints-To: abuse@xs4all.nl Xref: csiph.com comp.lang.python:86693 On 2015-03-02 01:37, Dennis Lee Bieber wrote: > On Sun, 1 Mar 2015 13:43:50 +1100, Chris Angelico > declaimed the following: > >>losing performance. Conversely, I'm sure Python could also have been >>implemented on top of BASIC if someone felt like it, though what the >>advantages might be I have no idea. But performance is not (or should > > You'd be able to run it on a TI99/4 (in which the BASIC interpreter, > itself, was run on an interpreter... nothing like taking the first "16-bit" > home computer and shackling it with an interpreted language that was run on > an interpreted language) > The "16-bit" CPU had a 16-bit address bus (64K address space). If you were going to switch from an 8-bit processor to a 16-bit processor, one of the pluses you'd be looking for would the ability to directly address more than 64K.