Re: The potential for a Python 2.8.

From	Grant Edwards <invalid@invalid.invalid>
Newsgroups	comp.lang.python
Subject	Re: The potential for a Python 2.8.
Date	2014-01-25 02:24 +0000
Organization	PANIX Public Access Internet and UNIX, NYC
Message-ID	<lbv78v$ht2$1@reader1.panix.com> (permalink)
References	(4 earlier) <roy-668EEC.21224223012014@news.panix.com> <mailman.5927.1390530488.18130.python-list@python.org> <roy-580E46.21344323012014@news.panix.com> <lbu1an$3rb$1@reader1.panix.com> <roy-EF399D.19562324012014@news.panix.com>

Show all headers | View raw

On 2014-01-25, Roy Smith <roy@panix.com> wrote:
> In article <lbu1an$3rb$1@reader1.panix.com>,
>  Grant Edwards <invalid@invalid.invalid> wrote:
>
>> On 2014-01-24, Roy Smith <roy@panix.com> wrote:
>> > In article <mailman.5927.1390530488.18130.python-list@python.org>,
>> >  Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> wrote:
>> >
>> >> On Fri, Jan 24, 2014 at 1:22 PM, Roy Smith <roy@panix.com> wrote:
>> >> >> Python 2.8j?
>> >> >
>> >> > You're imagining things.
>> >> 
>> >> Get real... s'not gonna happen.
>> >> 
>> > I wouldn't bet on that.  The situation keeps getting tensor and
>> > tensor.
>> 
>> I have a feeling there's a pun there based on the worlds "real" and
>> "tensor", but I don't have the math skills required to figure it out.
>
> You must be pretty weak in math, then.

It was more of reading problem. I completely failed to notice the "j"
and the "imagining".  Now I get it.

> This really isn't that complex.

I refuse to become a vector for the spread of these bad puns.

-- 
Grant

Back to comp.lang.python | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

Re: The potential for a Python 2.8. MRAB <python@mrabarnett.plus.com> - 2014-01-24 02:05 +0000
  Re: The potential for a Python 2.8. Roy Smith <roy@panix.com> - 2014-01-23 21:22 -0500
    Re: The potential for a Python 2.8. Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2014-01-24 13:28 +1100
      Re: The potential for a Python 2.8. Roy Smith <roy@panix.com> - 2014-01-23 21:34 -0500
        Re: The potential for a Python 2.8. Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2014-01-24 13:39 +1100
        Re: The potential for a Python 2.8. Grant Edwards <invalid@invalid.invalid> - 2014-01-24 15:36 +0000
          Re: The potential for a Python 2.8. Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2014-01-25 02:57 +1100
          Re: The potential for a Python 2.8. Terry Reedy <tjreedy@udel.edu> - 2014-01-24 12:17 -0500
          Re: The potential for a Python 2.8. Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2014-01-25 04:30 +1100
          Re: The potential for a Python 2.8. Roy Smith <roy@panix.com> - 2014-01-24 19:56 -0500
            Re: The potential for a Python 2.8. Tim Chase <python.list@tim.thechases.com> - 2014-01-24 19:07 -0600
            Re: The potential for a Python 2.8. Grant Edwards <invalid@invalid.invalid> - 2014-01-25 02:24 +0000

csiph-web