Path: csiph.com!v102.xanadu-bbs.net!xanadu-bbs.net!news.glorb.com!usenet.stanford.edu!panix!not-for-mail From: Grant Edwards Newsgroups: comp.lang.python Subject: Re: The potential for a Python 2.8. Date: Sat, 25 Jan 2014 02:24:31 +0000 (UTC) Organization: PANIX Public Access Internet and UNIX, NYC Lines: 33 Message-ID: References: NNTP-Posting-Host: c-24-118-110-103.hsd1.mn.comcast.net X-Trace: reader1.panix.com 1390616671 18338 24.118.110.103 (25 Jan 2014 02:24:31 GMT) X-Complaints-To: abuse@panix.com NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 25 Jan 2014 02:24:31 +0000 (UTC) User-Agent: slrn/1.0.1 (Linux) Xref: csiph.com comp.lang.python:64716 On 2014-01-25, Roy Smith wrote: > In article , > Grant Edwards wrote: > >> On 2014-01-24, Roy Smith wrote: >> > In article , >> > Chris Angelico wrote: >> > >> >> On Fri, Jan 24, 2014 at 1:22 PM, Roy Smith wrote: >> >> >> Python 2.8j? >> >> > >> >> > You're imagining things. >> >> >> >> Get real... s'not gonna happen. >> >> >> > I wouldn't bet on that. The situation keeps getting tensor and >> > tensor. >> >> I have a feeling there's a pun there based on the worlds "real" and >> "tensor", but I don't have the math skills required to figure it out. > > You must be pretty weak in math, then. It was more of reading problem. I completely failed to notice the "j" and the "imagining". Now I get it. > This really isn't that complex. I refuse to become a vector for the spread of these bad puns. -- Grant