Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.lang.python > #76551
| Path | csiph.com!v102.xanadu-bbs.net!xanadu-bbs.net!feeder.erje.net!us.feeder.erje.net!newsfeed.fsmpi.rwth-aachen.de!eternal-september.org!feeder.eternal-september.org!news.unit0.net!cyclone02.ams2.highwinds-media.com!voer-me.highwinds-media.com!peer02.am1!peering.am1!peer01.fr7!news.highwinds-media.com!post01.fr7!fx35.am4.POSTED!not-for-mail |
|---|---|
| From | alister <alister.nospam.ware@ntlworld.com> |
| Subject | Re: 'is not' or '!=' |
| Newsgroups | comp.lang.python |
| References | <lsto1s$6gk$1@dont-email.me> <87fvgt7c4i.fsf@elektro.pacujo.net> |
| User-Agent | Pan/0.139 (Sexual Chocolate; GIT bf56508 git://git.gnome.org/pan2) |
| MIME-Version | 1.0 |
| Content-Type | text/plain; charset=UTF-8 |
| Content-Transfer-Encoding | 8bit |
| Lines | 38 |
| Message-ID | <iTEIv.3706$9I4.2004@fx35.am4> (permalink) |
| NNTP-Posting-Host | 82.9.78.47 |
| X-Complaints-To | http://netreport.virginmedia.com |
| X-Trace | 1408440910 82.9.78.47 (Tue, 19 Aug 2014 09:35:10 UTC) |
| NNTP-Posting-Date | Tue, 19 Aug 2014 09:35:10 UTC |
| Organization | virginmedia.com |
| Date | Tue, 19 Aug 2014 09:35:10 GMT |
| X-Received-Body-CRC | 4138932560 |
| X-Received-Bytes | 2156 |
| Xref | csiph.com comp.lang.python:76551 |
Show key headers only | View raw
On Mon, 18 Aug 2014 23:53:49 +0300, Marko Rauhamaa wrote: > "ElChino" <elchino@cnn.cn>: > >> A newbie question to you; what is the difference between statements >> like: >> if x is not None: >> and if x != None: > > Do the following: take two $10 bills. Hold one bill in the left hand, > hold the other bill in the right hand. > > Now, the bill in the left hand "is not" the bill in the right hand. > However, the bill in the left hand "==" the bill in the right hand. > >> Without any context, which one should be preferred? >> IMHO, the latter is more readable. > > In almost all cases, both tests would result in the same behavior. > However, the "is not" test is conceptually the correct one since you > want to know if x is the one and only None object. You don't want to be > fooled by an imposter object that simply looks like the None object. > Frankly, I don't know of any other object that is "==" to the None > object except None itself, but such objects could possible exist. > > > Marko Depending on context you may 'Want' 0 to be equal to none however as far as python is concerned it is not. -- "Why must you tell me all your secrets when it's hard enough to love you knowing nothing?" -- Lloyd Cole and the Commotions
Back to comp.lang.python | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
'is not' or '!=' "ElChino" <elchino@cnn.cn> - 2014-08-18 22:35 +0200
Re: 'is not' or '!=' MRAB <python@mrabarnett.plus.com> - 2014-08-18 21:53 +0100
Re: 'is not' or '!=' Marko Rauhamaa <marko@pacujo.net> - 2014-08-18 23:53 +0300
Re: 'is not' or '!=' "ElChino" <elchino@cnn.cn> - 2014-08-18 22:58 +0200
Re: 'is not' or '!=' Ethan Furman <ethan@stoneleaf.us> - 2014-08-18 14:42 -0700
Re: 'is not' or '!=' Ethan Furman <ethan@stoneleaf.us> - 2014-08-18 15:19 -0700
Re: 'is not' or '!=' Chris Kaynor <ckaynor@zindagigames.com> - 2014-08-18 15:04 -0700
Re: 'is not' or '!=' Thomas Rachel <nutznetz-0c1b6768-bfa9-48d5-a470-7603bd3aa915@spamschutz.glglgl.de> - 2014-08-19 11:49 +0200
Re: 'is not' or '!=' Martin S <shieldfire@gmail.com> - 2014-08-19 14:42 +0200
Re: 'is not' or '!=' Skip Montanaro <skip@pobox.com> - 2014-08-19 08:12 -0500
Re: 'is not' or '!=' Marko Rauhamaa <marko@pacujo.net> - 2014-08-19 20:29 +0300
Re: 'is not' or '!=' Tim Chase <python.list@tim.thechases.com> - 2014-08-19 12:34 -0500
Re: 'is not' or '!=' Marko Rauhamaa <marko@pacujo.net> - 2014-08-19 21:18 +0300
Re: 'is not' or '!=' Steven D'Aprano <steve+comp.lang.python@pearwood.info> - 2014-08-20 04:26 +1000
Re: 'is not' or '!=' Marko Rauhamaa <marko@pacujo.net> - 2014-08-19 21:52 +0300
Re: 'is not' or '!=' Marko Rauhamaa <marko@pacujo.net> - 2014-08-20 00:00 +0300
Re: 'is not' or '!=' Ian Kelly <ian.g.kelly@gmail.com> - 2014-08-19 16:21 -0600
Re: 'is not' or '!=' Marko Rauhamaa <marko@pacujo.net> - 2014-08-20 02:02 +0300
Re: 'is not' or '!=' Rustom Mody <rustompmody@gmail.com> - 2014-08-20 22:03 -0700
Re: 'is not' or '!=' Marko Rauhamaa <marko@pacujo.net> - 2014-08-21 08:56 +0300
Re: 'is not' or '!=' Mark Lawrence <breamoreboy@yahoo.co.uk> - 2014-08-19 20:05 +0100
Re: 'is not' or '!=' Terry Reedy <tjreedy@udel.edu> - 2014-08-19 18:23 -0400
Re: 'is not' or '!=' Ian Kelly <ian.g.kelly@gmail.com> - 2014-08-19 10:42 -0600
Re: 'is not' or '!=' Marko Rauhamaa <marko@pacujo.net> - 2014-08-19 20:36 +0300
Re: 'is not' or '!=' Skip Montanaro <skip@pobox.com> - 2014-08-19 13:44 -0500
Re: 'is not' or '!=' alister <alister.nospam.ware@ntlworld.com> - 2014-08-19 09:35 +0000
Re: 'is not' or '!=' Thomas Rachel <nutznetz-0c1b6768-bfa9-48d5-a470-7603bd3aa915@spamschutz.glglgl.de> - 2014-08-19 11:53 +0200
Re: 'is not' or '!=' Rustom Mody <rustompmody@gmail.com> - 2014-08-18 19:29 -0700
Re: 'is not' or '!=' Steven D'Aprano <steve@pearwood.info> - 2014-08-19 08:36 +0000
Re: 'is not' or '!=' Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2014-08-19 18:47 +1000
Re: 'is not' or '!=' Tim Chase <python.list@tim.thechases.com> - 2014-08-19 05:36 -0500
Re: 'is not' or '!=' Ben Finney <ben+python@benfinney.id.au> - 2014-08-20 09:24 +1000
Re: 'is not' or '!=' Rustom Mody <rustompmody@gmail.com> - 2014-08-19 21:01 -0700
Re: 'is not' or '!=' Steven D'Aprano <steve@pearwood.info> - 2014-08-20 04:59 +0000
Re: 'is not' or '!=' Rustom Mody <rustompmody@gmail.com> - 2014-08-19 22:25 -0700
Re: 'is not' or '!=' Steven D'Aprano <steve+comp.lang.python@pearwood.info> - 2014-08-20 21:05 +1000
Re: 'is not' or '!=' Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2014-08-20 21:17 +1000
Re: 'is not' or '!=' Thomas Rachel <nutznetz-0c1b6768-bfa9-48d5-a470-7603bd3aa915@spamschutz.glglgl.de> - 2014-08-21 20:31 +0200
Re: 'is not' or '!=' Tim Chase <python.list@tim.thechases.com> - 2014-08-20 06:26 -0500
Re: 'is not' or '!=' Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2014-08-20 21:33 +1000
Re: 'is not' or '!=' Robert Kern <robert.kern@gmail.com> - 2014-08-20 12:40 +0100
Re: 'is not' or '!=' Rustom Mody <rustompmody@gmail.com> - 2014-08-20 05:01 -0700
Re: 'is not' or '!=' Dan Stromberg <drsalists@gmail.com> - 2014-08-21 12:24 -0700
Re: 'is not' or '!=' "ElChino" <elchino@cnn.cn> - 2014-08-21 21:42 +0200
csiph-web