Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.lang.python > #72667
| Newsgroups | comp.lang.python |
|---|---|
| Date | 2014-06-04 19:06 -0700 |
| References | (3 earlier) <CAPTjJmrwGVaJKmzLiX8buZQmGxrGJV657Jnb7fsK7j1-pLxtVA@mail.gmail.com> <mailman.10646.1401831682.18130.python-list@python.org> <44acd692-5dcd-4e5f-8238-7fbe0de4db2a@googlegroups.com> <mailman.10673.1401853976.18130.python-list@python.org> <roy-77A8E4.14420604062014@news.panix.com> |
| Message-ID | <f935e85f-f86a-4821-86ab-3ab7e5e216d7@googlegroups.com> (permalink) |
| Subject | Re: Micro Python -- a lean and efficient implementation of Python 3 |
| From | Rustom Mody <rustompmody@gmail.com> |
On Thursday, June 5, 2014 12:12:06 AM UTC+5:30, Roy Smith wrote: > Chris Angelico wrote: > > You can't ignore those. You might be able to say "Well, my program > > will run slower if you throw these at it", but if you're going down > > that route, you probably want the full FSR and the advantages it > > confers on ASCII and Latin-1 strings. Binding your program to BMP-only > > is nearly as dangerous as binding it to ASCII-only; potentially worse, > > because you can run an awful lot of artificial tests without > > remembering to stick in some astral characters. > Yup. I wrote a while(*) back about the pain I was having importing some > data into a MySQL(**) database which (unknown to me when I started) only > handled BMP. It turns out in the entire dataset of 20-odd million > records, there were exactly four that had astral characters. All of my > tests worked. I didn't discover the problem until it blew up many hours > into the "final" production import run. > (*) Two years? > (**) This was not the only pain point with MySQL. We eventually > switched to Postgress. Thanks Roy for bringing up that example - I was trying to recollect the details. I forgot about the MySQL angle which adds a different twist to it. Here's my interpretation of that situation; I'd like to hear yours: Basic problem was that MySQL handled a strict subset of what the rest of the system (Python 2.7?) could handle. This meant that at a late (and embarrassing) stage, exceptions were being thrown, from deep within the system. OTOH, let's say you could detect the 'error' (more correctly 'un-handle-able') at the borders of your system, say when the user enters the data on a web-form. Would you have a problem kicking out those characters (in both senses!) with a curt: "Cant deal with all this supra-galactic rubble!" ? Of course switching to postgres may be a sound choice on other fronts. But if that were not an option, and you only had these choices: - significantly complexify your MySQL data structures to handle 4 in 20 million cases - just detect and throw such cases out at the outset which would you take? In any case this is the choice I hear from the micropython folks who are explicitly seeking a cutdown version of python
Back to comp.lang.python | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Re: Micro Python -- a lean and efficient implementation of Python 3 Paul Sokolovsky <pmiscml@gmail.com> - 2014-06-04 00:41 +0300
Re: Micro Python -- a lean and efficient implementation of Python 3 Rustom Mody <rustompmody@gmail.com> - 2014-06-03 20:37 -0700
Re: Micro Python -- a lean and efficient implementation of Python 3 Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2014-06-04 13:52 +1000
Re: Micro Python -- a lean and efficient implementation of Python 3 Rustom Mody <rustompmody@gmail.com> - 2014-06-03 21:40 -0700
Re: Micro Python -- a lean and efficient implementation of Python 3 Ian Kelly <ian.g.kelly@gmail.com> - 2014-06-03 23:02 -0600
Re: Micro Python -- a lean and efficient implementation of Python 3 Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2014-06-04 17:16 +1000
Re: Micro Python -- a lean and efficient implementation of Python 3 Steven D'Aprano <steve@pearwood.info> - 2014-06-04 07:42 +0000
Re: Micro Python -- a lean and efficient implementation of Python 3 Paul Rubin <no.email@nospam.invalid> - 2014-06-04 00:58 -0700
Re: Micro Python -- a lean and efficient implementation of Python 3 Robin Becker <robin@reportlab.com> - 2014-06-04 11:06 +0100
Re: Micro Python -- a lean and efficient implementation of Python 3 Tim Chase <python.list@tim.thechases.com> - 2014-06-04 06:01 -0500
Re: Micro Python -- a lean and efficient implementation of Python 3 Marko Rauhamaa <marko@pacujo.net> - 2014-06-04 14:57 +0300
Re: Micro Python -- a lean and efficient implementation of Python 3 Tim Chase <python.list@tim.thechases.com> - 2014-06-04 07:25 -0500
Re: Micro Python -- a lean and efficient implementation of Python 3 Paul Rubin <no.email@nospam.invalid> - 2014-06-04 11:25 -0700
Re: Micro Python -- a lean and efficient implementation of Python 3 Robin Becker <robin@reportlab.com> - 2014-06-04 12:53 +0100
Re: Micro Python -- a lean and efficient implementation of Python 3 Marko Rauhamaa <marko@pacujo.net> - 2014-06-04 15:17 +0300
Re: Micro Python -- a lean and efficient implementation of Python 3 Robin Becker <robin@reportlab.com> - 2014-06-04 13:31 +0100
Re: Micro Python -- a lean and efficient implementation of Python 3 Steven D'Aprano <steve+comp.lang.python@pearwood.info> - 2014-06-04 13:51 +0000
Re: Micro Python -- a lean and efficient implementation of Python 3 wxjmfauth@gmail.com - 2014-06-10 00:32 -0700
Re: Micro Python -- a lean and efficient implementation of Python 3 wxjmfauth@gmail.com - 2014-06-10 02:13 -0700
Re: Micro Python -- a lean and efficient implementation of Python 3 Tim Chase <python.list@tim.thechases.com> - 2014-06-04 07:21 -0500
Re: Micro Python -- a lean and efficient implementation of Python 3 Travis Griggs <travisgriggs@gmail.com> - 2014-06-06 09:59 -0700
Re: Micro Python -- a lean and efficient implementation of Python 3 Roy Smith <roy@panix.com> - 2014-06-06 13:29 -0400
Re: Micro Python -- a lean and efficient implementation of Python 3 Tim Chase <python.list@tim.thechases.com> - 2014-06-06 21:20 -0500
Re: Micro Python -- a lean and efficient implementation of Python 3 wxjmfauth@gmail.com - 2014-06-10 12:27 -0700
Re: Micro Python -- a lean and efficient implementation of Python 3 Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2014-06-04 17:20 +1000
Re: Micro Python -- a lean and efficient implementation of Python 3 Wolfgang Maier <wolfgang.maier@biologie.uni-freiburg.de> - 2014-06-04 10:00 +0200
Re: Micro Python -- a lean and efficient implementation of Python 3 Roy Smith <roy@panix.com> - 2014-06-04 14:42 -0400
Re: Micro Python -- a lean and efficient implementation of Python 3 Rustom Mody <rustompmody@gmail.com> - 2014-06-04 19:06 -0700
Re: Micro Python -- a lean and efficient implementation of Python 3 Roy Smith <roy@panix.com> - 2014-06-05 09:59 -0400
Re: Micro Python -- a lean and efficient implementation of Python 3 Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2014-06-06 01:33 +1000
Re: Micro Python -- a lean and efficient implementation of Python 3 Steven D'Aprano <steve@pearwood.info> - 2014-06-04 05:20 +0000
Re: Micro Python -- a lean and efficient implementation of Python 3 Rustom Mody <rustompmody@gmail.com> - 2014-06-03 22:36 -0700
Re: Micro Python -- a lean and efficient implementation of Python 3 Ian Kelly <ian.g.kelly@gmail.com> - 2014-06-03 23:55 -0600
Re: Micro Python -- a lean and efficient implementation of Python 3 Terry Reedy <tjreedy@udel.edu> - 2014-06-04 03:00 -0400
Re: Micro Python -- a lean and efficient implementation of Python 3 Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2014-06-04 17:10 +1000
csiph-web