Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.lang.python > #72582
| Newsgroups | comp.lang.python |
|---|---|
| Date | 2014-06-03 20:37 -0700 |
| References | <CANw+MznPsKgJiW6e_O370VUsmVVxBfQ=M_7WUyU7+wNh+-qefA@mail.gmail.com> <CAPTjJmoB0eMMMhjUz++yYV2CEv=2xUXx7P8UuRvCk7y7gB-4+Q@mail.gmail.com> <20140603194949.3147497d@x34f> <CAPTjJmrwGVaJKmzLiX8buZQmGxrGJV657Jnb7fsK7j1-pLxtVA@mail.gmail.com> <mailman.10646.1401831682.18130.python-list@python.org> |
| Message-ID | <44acd692-5dcd-4e5f-8238-7fbe0de4db2a@googlegroups.com> (permalink) |
| Subject | Re: Micro Python -- a lean and efficient implementation of Python 3 |
| From | Rustom Mody <rustompmody@gmail.com> |
On Wednesday, June 4, 2014 3:11:12 AM UTC+5:30, Paul Sokolovsky wrote: > With that in mind, I, as many others, think that forcing Unicode bloat > upon people by default is the most controversial feature of Python3. > The reason is that you go very long way dealing with languages of the > people of the world by just treating strings as consisting of 8-bit > data. I'd say, that's enough for 90% of applications. Unicode is needed > only if one needs to deal with multiple languages *at the same time*, > which is fairly rare (remaining 10% of apps). > And please keep in mind that MicroPython was originally intended (and > should be remain scalable down to) an MCU. Unicode needed there is even > less, and even less resources to support Unicode just because. At some time (when jmf was making more intelligible noises) I had suggested that the choice between 1/2/4 byte strings that happens at runtime in python3's FSR can be made at python-start time with a command-line switch. There are many combinations here; here is one in more detail: Instead of having one (FSR) string engine, you have (upto) 4 - a pure 1 byte (ASCII) - a pure 2 byte (BMP) with decode-failures for out-of-ranges - a pure 4 byte -- everything UTF-32 - FSR dynamic switching at runtime (with massive moping from the world's jmfs) The point is that only one of these engines would be brought into memory based on command-line/config options. Some more personal thoughts (that may be quite ill-informed!): 1. I regard myself as a unicode ignoramus+enthusiast. The world will be a better place if unicode is more pervasive. See http://blog.languager.org/2014/04/unicoded-python.html As it happens I am also a computer scientist -- I understand that in contexts where anything other than 8-bit chars is unacceptably inefficient, unicode-bloat may be a real thing. 2. My casual/cursory reading of the contents of the SMP-planes suggests that the stuff there is are things like - egyptian hieroplyphics - mahjong characters - ancient greek musical symbols - alchemical symbols etc etc. IOW from pov of a universallly acceptable character set this is mostly rubbish And so a pure BMP-supporting implementation may be a reasonable compromise. [As long as no surrogate-pairs are there]
Back to comp.lang.python | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Re: Micro Python -- a lean and efficient implementation of Python 3 Paul Sokolovsky <pmiscml@gmail.com> - 2014-06-04 00:41 +0300
Re: Micro Python -- a lean and efficient implementation of Python 3 Rustom Mody <rustompmody@gmail.com> - 2014-06-03 20:37 -0700
Re: Micro Python -- a lean and efficient implementation of Python 3 Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2014-06-04 13:52 +1000
Re: Micro Python -- a lean and efficient implementation of Python 3 Rustom Mody <rustompmody@gmail.com> - 2014-06-03 21:40 -0700
Re: Micro Python -- a lean and efficient implementation of Python 3 Ian Kelly <ian.g.kelly@gmail.com> - 2014-06-03 23:02 -0600
Re: Micro Python -- a lean and efficient implementation of Python 3 Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2014-06-04 17:16 +1000
Re: Micro Python -- a lean and efficient implementation of Python 3 Steven D'Aprano <steve@pearwood.info> - 2014-06-04 07:42 +0000
Re: Micro Python -- a lean and efficient implementation of Python 3 Paul Rubin <no.email@nospam.invalid> - 2014-06-04 00:58 -0700
Re: Micro Python -- a lean and efficient implementation of Python 3 Robin Becker <robin@reportlab.com> - 2014-06-04 11:06 +0100
Re: Micro Python -- a lean and efficient implementation of Python 3 Tim Chase <python.list@tim.thechases.com> - 2014-06-04 06:01 -0500
Re: Micro Python -- a lean and efficient implementation of Python 3 Marko Rauhamaa <marko@pacujo.net> - 2014-06-04 14:57 +0300
Re: Micro Python -- a lean and efficient implementation of Python 3 Tim Chase <python.list@tim.thechases.com> - 2014-06-04 07:25 -0500
Re: Micro Python -- a lean and efficient implementation of Python 3 Paul Rubin <no.email@nospam.invalid> - 2014-06-04 11:25 -0700
Re: Micro Python -- a lean and efficient implementation of Python 3 Robin Becker <robin@reportlab.com> - 2014-06-04 12:53 +0100
Re: Micro Python -- a lean and efficient implementation of Python 3 Marko Rauhamaa <marko@pacujo.net> - 2014-06-04 15:17 +0300
Re: Micro Python -- a lean and efficient implementation of Python 3 Robin Becker <robin@reportlab.com> - 2014-06-04 13:31 +0100
Re: Micro Python -- a lean and efficient implementation of Python 3 Steven D'Aprano <steve+comp.lang.python@pearwood.info> - 2014-06-04 13:51 +0000
Re: Micro Python -- a lean and efficient implementation of Python 3 wxjmfauth@gmail.com - 2014-06-10 00:32 -0700
Re: Micro Python -- a lean and efficient implementation of Python 3 wxjmfauth@gmail.com - 2014-06-10 02:13 -0700
Re: Micro Python -- a lean and efficient implementation of Python 3 Tim Chase <python.list@tim.thechases.com> - 2014-06-04 07:21 -0500
Re: Micro Python -- a lean and efficient implementation of Python 3 Travis Griggs <travisgriggs@gmail.com> - 2014-06-06 09:59 -0700
Re: Micro Python -- a lean and efficient implementation of Python 3 Roy Smith <roy@panix.com> - 2014-06-06 13:29 -0400
Re: Micro Python -- a lean and efficient implementation of Python 3 Tim Chase <python.list@tim.thechases.com> - 2014-06-06 21:20 -0500
Re: Micro Python -- a lean and efficient implementation of Python 3 wxjmfauth@gmail.com - 2014-06-10 12:27 -0700
Re: Micro Python -- a lean and efficient implementation of Python 3 Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2014-06-04 17:20 +1000
Re: Micro Python -- a lean and efficient implementation of Python 3 Wolfgang Maier <wolfgang.maier@biologie.uni-freiburg.de> - 2014-06-04 10:00 +0200
Re: Micro Python -- a lean and efficient implementation of Python 3 Roy Smith <roy@panix.com> - 2014-06-04 14:42 -0400
Re: Micro Python -- a lean and efficient implementation of Python 3 Rustom Mody <rustompmody@gmail.com> - 2014-06-04 19:06 -0700
Re: Micro Python -- a lean and efficient implementation of Python 3 Roy Smith <roy@panix.com> - 2014-06-05 09:59 -0400
Re: Micro Python -- a lean and efficient implementation of Python 3 Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2014-06-06 01:33 +1000
Re: Micro Python -- a lean and efficient implementation of Python 3 Steven D'Aprano <steve@pearwood.info> - 2014-06-04 05:20 +0000
Re: Micro Python -- a lean and efficient implementation of Python 3 Rustom Mody <rustompmody@gmail.com> - 2014-06-03 22:36 -0700
Re: Micro Python -- a lean and efficient implementation of Python 3 Ian Kelly <ian.g.kelly@gmail.com> - 2014-06-03 23:55 -0600
Re: Micro Python -- a lean and efficient implementation of Python 3 Terry Reedy <tjreedy@udel.edu> - 2014-06-04 03:00 -0400
Re: Micro Python -- a lean and efficient implementation of Python 3 Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2014-06-04 17:10 +1000
csiph-web