Re: Should non-security 2.7 bugs be fixed?

X-Received	by 10.70.54.193 with SMTP id l1mr29893042pdp.11.1437356118378; Sun, 19 Jul 2015 18:35:18 -0700 (PDT)
X-Received	by 10.182.138.9 with SMTP id qm9mr240694obb.34.1437356118314; Sun, 19 Jul 2015 18:35:18 -0700 (PDT)
Path	csiph.com!optima2.xanadu-bbs.net!xanadu-bbs.net!news.glorb.com!pg9no2274689igb.0!news-out.google.com!t2ni15776igk.0!nntp.google.com!pg9no2274686igb.0!postnews.google.com!glegroupsg2000goo.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail
Newsgroups	comp.lang.python
Date	Sun, 19 Jul 2015 18:35:18 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To	<bfa7f18e-8c1e-424b-9a3d-b99ce723c856@googlegroups.com>
Complaints-To	groups-abuse@google.com
Injection-Info	glegroupsg2000goo.googlegroups.com; posting-host=70.196.77.157; posting-account=h3aEwQoAAACiuqX-oR3gvCVFm8lLHoWj
NNTP-Posting-Host	70.196.77.157
References	<moenuj$f11$1@ger.gmane.org> <CABicbJ+Fy=Jhj63VnOmS3BJD3He+i3J+P+ASMmjJDMi9X7rt-w@mail.gmail.com> <mof14q$b47$1@ger.gmane.org> <mailman.713.1437313378.3674.python-list@python.org> <87y4icxh4r.fsf@Equus.decebal.nl> <mailman.736.1437332518.3674.python-list@python.org> <87egk3ykui.fsf@Equus.decebal.nl> <mailman.742.1437337734.3674.python-list@python.org> <87a8uryf2e.fsf@Equus.decebal.nl> <mailman.749.1437346309.3674.python-list@python.org> <87zj2rwx3g.fsf@Equus.decebal.nl> <mailman.753.1437352096.3674.python-list@python.org> <0abc1500-0e0b-44b3-b078-63aa51eaf5b5@googlegroups.com> <bfa7f18e-8c1e-424b-9a3d-b99ce723c856@googlegroups.com>
User-Agent	G2/1.0
MIME-Version	1.0
Message-ID	<f6ebb2fd-fb70-4781-98ca-dac47c2f7179@googlegroups.com> (permalink)
Subject	Re: Should non-security 2.7 bugs be fixed?
From	Rick Johnson <rantingrickjohnson@gmail.com>
Injection-Date	Mon, 20 Jul 2015 01:35:18 +0000
Content-Type	text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Xref	csiph.com comp.lang.python:94186

Show key headers only | View raw

On Sunday, July 19, 2015 at 8:26:52 PM UTC-5, bream...@gmail.com wrote:
> On Monday, July 20, 2015 at 1:49:58 AM UTC+1, Rick Johnson wrote:
> > On Sunday, July 19, 2015 at 7:28:28 PM UTC-5, Mark Lawrence wrote:

> > Every time i defeat [MARK LAWRENCE], and drag him out
> > through an opening in the "caverns of code", and take
> > him to a secret grove owned by D'Aprano, he always
> > escapes and returns to guard the entrance again -- he's
> > very loyal!
> 
> Your total number of victories over me is zero, although I
> personally come here to give or get knowledge, not look
> for such things.

I figured that was you *MARK LAWRENCE*. I shall add sock-puppeting 
to your many egregious offenses! And poorly executed sock-puppeting 
as well! You're a zero.

Thread

Re: Should non-security 2.7 bugs be fixed? Mark Lawrence <breamoreboy@yahoo.co.uk> - 2015-07-19 14:42 +0100
  Re: Should non-security 2.7 bugs be fixed? Cecil Westerhof <Cecil@decebal.nl> - 2015-07-19 18:10 +0200
    Re: Should non-security 2.7 bugs be fixed? Mark Lawrence <breamoreboy@yahoo.co.uk> - 2015-07-19 17:38 +0100
      Re: Should non-security 2.7 bugs be fixed? Cecil Westerhof <Cecil@decebal.nl> - 2015-07-19 19:14 +0200
        Re: Should non-security 2.7 bugs be fixed? Mark Lawrence <breamoreboy@yahoo.co.uk> - 2015-07-19 18:54 +0100
          Re: Should non-security 2.7 bugs be fixed? Rick Johnson <rantingrickjohnson@gmail.com> - 2015-07-19 11:28 -0700
            Re: Should non-security 2.7 bugs be fixed? breamoreboy@gmail.com - 2015-07-19 11:44 -0700
              Re: Should non-security 2.7 bugs be fixed? Rick Johnson <rantingrickjohnson@gmail.com> - 2015-07-19 12:13 -0700
                Re: Should non-security 2.7 bugs be fixed? breamoreboy@gmail.com - 2015-07-19 13:21 -0700
                Re: Should non-security 2.7 bugs be fixed? Steven D'Aprano <steve@pearwood.info> - 2015-07-20 12:36 +1000
                Re: Should non-security 2.7 bugs be fixed? Paul Rubin <no.email@nospam.invalid> - 2015-07-19 21:07 -0700
                Re: Should non-security 2.7 bugs be fixed? Mark Lawrence <breamoreboy@yahoo.co.uk> - 2015-07-22 00:40 +0100
                Re: Should non-security 2.7 bugs be fixed? dieter <dieter@handshake.de> - 2015-07-20 08:46 +0200
                Re: Should non-security 2.7 bugs be fixed? Rick Johnson <rantingrickjohnson@gmail.com> - 2015-07-20 22:00 -0700
        Re: Should non-security 2.7 bugs be fixed? dieter <dieter@handshake.de> - 2015-07-20 08:36 +0200
    Re: Should non-security 2.7 bugs be fixed? Ian Kelly <ian.g.kelly@gmail.com> - 2015-07-19 13:01 -0600
      Re: Should non-security 2.7 bugs be fixed? Rick Johnson <rantingrickjohnson@gmail.com> - 2015-07-19 12:28 -0700
        Re: Should non-security 2.7 bugs be fixed? breamoreboy@gmail.com - 2015-07-19 13:36 -0700
          Re: Should non-security 2.7 bugs be fixed? Rick Johnson <rantingrickjohnson@gmail.com> - 2015-07-19 14:27 -0700
            Re: Should non-security 2.7 bugs be fixed? breamoreboy@gmail.com - 2015-07-19 17:45 -0700
              Re: Should non-security 2.7 bugs be fixed? Rick Johnson <rantingrickjohnson@gmail.com> - 2015-07-19 18:25 -0700
      Re: Should non-security 2.7 bugs be fixed? Cecil Westerhof <Cecil@decebal.nl> - 2015-07-19 22:05 +0200
        Re: Should non-security 2.7 bugs be fixed? Mark Lawrence <breamoreboy@yahoo.co.uk> - 2015-07-19 21:28 +0100
          Re: Should non-security 2.7 bugs be fixed? Cecil Westerhof <Cecil@decebal.nl> - 2015-07-20 00:10 +0200
            Re: Should non-security 2.7 bugs be fixed? Mark Lawrence <breamoreboy@yahoo.co.uk> - 2015-07-19 23:51 +0100
              Re: Should non-security 2.7 bugs be fixed? Cecil Westerhof <Cecil@decebal.nl> - 2015-07-20 01:23 +0200
                Re: Should non-security 2.7 bugs be fixed? Mark Lawrence <breamoreboy@yahoo.co.uk> - 2015-07-20 01:27 +0100
                Re: Should non-security 2.7 bugs be fixed? Rick Johnson <rantingrickjohnson@gmail.com> - 2015-07-19 17:49 -0700
                Re: Should non-security 2.7 bugs be fixed? breamoreboy@gmail.com - 2015-07-19 18:26 -0700
                Re: Should non-security 2.7 bugs be fixed? Rick Johnson <rantingrickjohnson@gmail.com> - 2015-07-19 18:35 -0700
                Re: Should non-security 2.7 bugs be fixed? Steven D'Aprano <steve@pearwood.info> - 2015-07-20 13:12 +1000
                Re: Should non-security 2.7 bugs be fixed? Ian Kelly <ian.g.kelly@gmail.com> - 2015-07-19 21:30 -0600
                Re: Should non-security 2.7 bugs be fixed? Steven D'Aprano <steve+comp.lang.python@pearwood.info> - 2015-07-20 15:59 +1000
                Re: Should non-security 2.7 bugs be fixed? Rick Johnson <rantingrickjohnson@gmail.com> - 2015-07-20 20:58 -0700
                Re: Should non-security 2.7 bugs be fixed? Steven D'Aprano <steve+comp.lang.python@pearwood.info> - 2015-07-21 18:33 +1000
                Re: Should non-security 2.7 bugs be fixed? Rustom Mody <rustompmody@gmail.com> - 2015-07-19 19:58 -0700
                Re: Should non-security 2.7 bugs be fixed? Michael Torrie <torriem@gmail.com> - 2015-07-19 23:33 -0600
                Re: Should non-security 2.7 bugs be fixed? Michael Torrie <torriem@gmail.com> - 2015-07-20 00:39 -0600
              Re: Should non-security 2.7 bugs be fixed? Steven D'Aprano <steve@pearwood.info> - 2015-07-20 12:49 +1000
      Re: Should non-security 2.7 bugs be fixed? Steven D'Aprano <steve@pearwood.info> - 2015-07-20 12:32 +1000
    Re: Should non-security 2.7 bugs be fixed? dieter <dieter@handshake.de> - 2015-07-20 08:06 +0200
    Re: Should non-security 2.7 bugs be fixed? dieter <dieter@handshake.de> - 2015-07-20 08:10 +0200

csiph-web