Path: csiph.com!v102.xanadu-bbs.net!xanadu-bbs.net!feeder.erje.net!1.eu.feeder.erje.net!news.swapon.de!fu-berlin.de!uni-berlin.de!individual.net!not-for-mail
From: Gregory Ewing <greg.ewing@canterbury.ac.nz>
Newsgroups: comp.lang.python
Subject: Re: Function decorator having arguments is complicated
Date: Wed, 29 Apr 2015 21:22:18 +1200
Lines: 16
Message-ID: <cqbm6bFdooeU1@mid.individual.net>
References: <mailman.31.1430102277.3680.python-list@python.org> <553de6f1$0$12905$c3e8da3$5496439d@news.astraweb.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Trace: individual.net 2ZlWB+mNePqzdIN/aRgaYQ1uUQGTNCkuc9deBxPRkrY9vNGDUy
Cancel-Lock: sha1:4SbL7clnI4NAwQ/Nf9JM03iw14I=
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.5 (Macintosh/20050711)
X-Accept-Language: en-us, en
In-Reply-To: <553de6f1$0$12905$c3e8da3$5496439d@news.astraweb.com>
Xref: csiph.com comp.lang.python:89535

> On Monday 27 April 2015 12:37, Makoto Kuwata wrote:
> 
>>  def multiply(n):
>>    def deco(func):
>>      def newfunc(*args, **kwargs):
>>        return n * func(*args, **kwargs)
>>      return newfunc
>>    return deco

I'd like to be able to write that as

    def multiply(n)(func)(*args, **kwargs):
       return n * func(*args, **kwargs)

-- 
Greg