Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.lang.python > #40346
| Newsgroups | comp.lang.python |
|---|---|
| Date | 2013-03-02 09:49 -0800 |
| References | <c4703b9f-44fd-4a6b-a600-b94de993bb4e@googlegroups.com> <mailman.2783.1362245815.2939.python-list@python.org> |
| Message-ID | <a6b8d573-495d-4c18-bfb0-975ccf44d8a2@googlegroups.com> (permalink) |
| Subject | Re: Sorting (deeply) nested lists |
| From | mamboknave@gmail.com |
On Saturday, March 2, 2013 9:36:43 AM UTC-8, Peter Otten wrote: > > You can also write this as > > namedTuples.sort(key=lambda item: item[1][1]) > That's exactly what I did before and got "IndexError: list index out of range". So, I thought my lambda was wrong and posted here. Now, having seen you reply, I dug deeper and... of course I had IndexError: the list was horribly empty! Thanks so much for replying so quickly, Peter!
Back to comp.lang.python | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Sorting (deeply) nested lists mamboknave@gmail.com - 2013-03-02 09:18 -0800
Re: Sorting (deeply) nested lists Peter Otten <__peter__@web.de> - 2013-03-02 18:36 +0100
Re: Sorting (deeply) nested lists mamboknave@gmail.com - 2013-03-02 09:49 -0800
Re: Sorting (deeply) nested lists mamboknave@gmail.com - 2013-03-02 09:49 -0800
csiph-web