Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.lang.python > #67674
"Steven D'Aprano" <steve@pearwood.info> wrote in message news:53159540$0$2923$c3e8da3$76491128@news.astraweb.com... > It's that "explicitly" part that doesn't follow. Having to manage types > is the most tedious, boring, annoying, *unproductive* part of languages > like Java, C and Pascal. Almost always, you're telling the compiler stuff > that it can work out for itself. Isn't creating classes in Python similar to creating types elsewhere? > In the same way that managing jumps for GOTO has been automated with for > loops, while, etc., and managing memory has been automated, there's no > good reason not to allow the compiler to manage types. Dynamically typed > languages like Python do so at runtime. Type inference simply allows > statically typed languages to do the same only at compile time. Eliminating 'goto' is simple code-generation logic; type inference is more of an art. But declaring variables is not just about specifying a type; it registers the name too so that misspelled names can be picked up very early rather than at runtime (and that's if you're lucky). > # Yes > [1, 3, 4, 2, 5, 9] > (1, "hello", None, 3.5) > > # No > [1, "hello", None, 3.5] > > > That is, lists are for collections of data of arbitrary length, tuples > are for records or structs with dedicated fields. > > That convention is a bit weaker these days than it used to be. Tuples now > have list-like methods, and we have namedtuple for record/struct-like > objects with named fields. (Aren't tuples immutable? They wouldn't work well for records then, because it would be impossible to change a field of a record.) -- Bartc
Back to comp.lang.python | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Re: Functional programming Ned Batchelder <ned@nedbatchelder.com> - 2014-03-02 20:27 -0500
Re: Functional programming Rustom Mody <rustompmody@gmail.com> - 2014-03-03 03:45 -0800
Re: Functional programming Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2014-03-03 23:20 +1100
Re: Functional programming Rustom Mody <rustompmody@gmail.com> - 2014-03-03 05:48 -0800
Re: Functional programming Rustom Mody <rustompmody@gmail.com> - 2014-03-03 05:51 -0800
Re: Functional programming Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2014-03-04 01:00 +1100
Re: Functional programming Rustom Mody <rustompmody@gmail.com> - 2014-03-03 06:08 -0800
Re: Functional programming Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2014-03-04 01:23 +1100
Re: Functional programming Rustom Mody <rustompmody@gmail.com> - 2014-03-03 06:38 -0800
Re: Functional programming Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2014-03-04 02:01 +1100
Re: Functional programming Rustom Mody <rustompmody@gmail.com> - 2014-03-03 07:28 -0800
Re: Functional programming Steven D'Aprano <steve+comp.lang.python@pearwood.info> - 2014-03-03 17:27 +0000
Re: Functional programming Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2014-03-04 05:37 +1100
Re: Functional programming Steven D'Aprano <steve@pearwood.info> - 2014-03-04 05:35 +0000
Re: Functional programming Rustom Mody <rustompmody@gmail.com> - 2014-03-03 21:59 -0800
Re: Functional programming Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2014-03-04 17:04 +1100
Re: Functional programming Rustom Mody <rustompmody@gmail.com> - 2014-03-03 22:20 -0800
Re: Functional programming Steven D'Aprano <steve@pearwood.info> - 2014-03-04 08:56 +0000
Re: Functional programming Antoon Pardon <antoon.pardon@rece.vub.ac.be> - 2014-03-04 11:56 +0100
Re: Functional programming Steven D'Aprano <steve+comp.lang.python@pearwood.info> - 2014-03-04 11:47 +0000
Re: Functional programming Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2014-03-05 00:01 +1100
OT Sine Rule [was Re: Functional programming] Steven D'Aprano <steve+comp.lang.python@pearwood.info> - 2014-03-04 14:25 +0000
Re: OT Sine Rule [was Re: Functional programming] Tim Chase <python.list@tim.thechases.com> - 2014-03-04 08:37 -0600
Re: OT Sine Rule [was Re: Functional programming] Mark Lawrence <breamoreboy@yahoo.co.uk> - 2014-03-04 14:42 +0000
Re: OT Sine Rule [was Re: Functional programming] Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2014-03-05 02:06 +1100
Re: OT Sine Rule [was Re: Functional programming] Tim Chase <python.list@tim.thechases.com> - 2014-03-04 09:21 -0600
Re: Functional programming Antoon Pardon <antoon.pardon@rece.vub.ac.be> - 2014-03-05 09:59 +0100
Re: Functional programming Marko Rauhamaa <marko@pacujo.net> - 2014-03-04 21:49 +0200
Re: Functional programming Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2014-03-05 07:01 +1100
Re: Functional programming Marko Rauhamaa <marko@pacujo.net> - 2014-03-04 22:50 +0200
Re: Functional programming Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2014-03-05 08:06 +1100
Re: Functional programming Marko Rauhamaa <marko@pacujo.net> - 2014-03-04 23:21 +0200
Re: Functional programming Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2014-03-05 08:26 +1100
Re: Functional programming Marko Rauhamaa <marko@pacujo.net> - 2014-03-04 23:43 +0200
Re: Functional programming Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2014-03-05 08:52 +1100
Re: Functional programming Gregory Ewing <greg.ewing@canterbury.ac.nz> - 2014-03-05 12:57 +1300
Re: Functional programming Marko Rauhamaa <marko@pacujo.net> - 2014-03-05 02:11 +0200
Re: Functional programming "BartC" <bc@freeuk.com> - 2014-03-04 13:30 +0000
Re: Functional programming Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2014-03-05 00:47 +1100
Re: Functional programming Mark Lawrence <breamoreboy@yahoo.co.uk> - 2014-03-04 14:05 +0000
Re: Functional programming Steven D'Aprano <steve+comp.lang.python@pearwood.info> - 2014-03-04 14:55 +0000
Re: Functional programming Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2014-03-05 02:13 +1100
Re: Functional programming MRAB <python@mrabarnett.plus.com> - 2014-03-04 17:07 +0000
Re: Functional programming Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2014-03-05 01:17 +1100
Re: Functional programming Steven D'Aprano <steve+comp.lang.python@pearwood.info> - 2014-03-04 15:18 +0000
Re: Functional programming Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2014-03-05 02:28 +1100
Re: Functional programming Steven D'Aprano <steve+comp.lang.python@pearwood.info> - 2014-03-04 15:45 +0000
Re: Functional programming Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2014-03-05 03:04 +1100
Re: Functional programming Antoon Pardon <antoon.pardon@rece.vub.ac.be> - 2014-03-05 10:09 +0100
Re: Functional programming "BartC" <bc@freeuk.com> - 2014-03-05 11:28 +0000
Re: Functional programming Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2014-03-05 23:04 +1100
Re: Functional programming Marko Rauhamaa <marko@pacujo.net> - 2014-03-05 14:11 +0200
Re: Functional programming Gregory Ewing <greg.ewing@canterbury.ac.nz> - 2014-03-04 11:06 +1300
Re: Functional programming Ben Finney <ben+python@benfinney.id.au> - 2014-03-04 09:31 +1100
Re: Functional programming Grant Edwards <invalid@invalid.invalid> - 2014-03-04 14:59 +0000
Re: Functional programming Steven D'Aprano <steve+comp.lang.python@pearwood.info> - 2014-03-04 15:22 +0000
Re: Functional programming Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2014-03-04 09:42 +1100
Re: Functional programming Ben Finney <ben+python@benfinney.id.au> - 2014-03-04 10:52 +1100
Re: Functional programming "BartC" <bc@freeuk.com> - 2014-03-04 09:41 +0000
Re: Functional programming 88888 Dihedral <dihedral88888@gmail.com> - 2014-03-03 16:35 -0800
csiph-web