Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.lang.python > #67836
| From | Marko Rauhamaa <marko@pacujo.net> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | comp.lang.python |
| Subject | Re: Functional programming |
| Date | 2014-03-05 14:11 +0200 |
| Organization | A noiseless patient Spider |
| Message-ID | <87vbvsrgj7.fsf@elektro.pacujo.net> (permalink) |
| References | (14 earlier) <53159540$0$2923$c3e8da3$76491128@news.astraweb.com> <XzkRu.27$O_6.17@fx04.am4> <5315eec0$0$29985$c3e8da3$5496439d@news.astraweb.com> <fVDRu.1902$rC1.875@fx34.am4> <mailman.7812.1394021064.18130.python-list@python.org> |
Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com>: > C++ has something very like this, with the 'auto' keyword. It's not > particularly useful for the examples you give, but can be much more so > when you have templates, iterators, and so on - where the exact type > declaration might be a couple dozen characters of pure syntactic salt, > since you're initializing it to some function's return value. Java has a widely practiced ideal that you should not tie variables to class types but instead stick to interface types. Thus, you want to declare: List<Integer> li = new LinkedList<Integer>(); Thing is, though, you can't automatically guess this. After all, you might be after: Iterable<Integer> li = new LinkedList<Integer>(); or maybe: Collection<Integer> li = new LinkedList<Integer>(); This principle doesn't concern only collections. A well-designed application should specify interfaces for pretty much all classes to separate design blocks and APIs from implementations du jour. (Again, something that has no relevance for Python users.) Marko
Back to comp.lang.python | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Re: Functional programming Ned Batchelder <ned@nedbatchelder.com> - 2014-03-02 20:27 -0500
Re: Functional programming Rustom Mody <rustompmody@gmail.com> - 2014-03-03 03:45 -0800
Re: Functional programming Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2014-03-03 23:20 +1100
Re: Functional programming Rustom Mody <rustompmody@gmail.com> - 2014-03-03 05:48 -0800
Re: Functional programming Rustom Mody <rustompmody@gmail.com> - 2014-03-03 05:51 -0800
Re: Functional programming Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2014-03-04 01:00 +1100
Re: Functional programming Rustom Mody <rustompmody@gmail.com> - 2014-03-03 06:08 -0800
Re: Functional programming Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2014-03-04 01:23 +1100
Re: Functional programming Rustom Mody <rustompmody@gmail.com> - 2014-03-03 06:38 -0800
Re: Functional programming Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2014-03-04 02:01 +1100
Re: Functional programming Rustom Mody <rustompmody@gmail.com> - 2014-03-03 07:28 -0800
Re: Functional programming Steven D'Aprano <steve+comp.lang.python@pearwood.info> - 2014-03-03 17:27 +0000
Re: Functional programming Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2014-03-04 05:37 +1100
Re: Functional programming Steven D'Aprano <steve@pearwood.info> - 2014-03-04 05:35 +0000
Re: Functional programming Rustom Mody <rustompmody@gmail.com> - 2014-03-03 21:59 -0800
Re: Functional programming Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2014-03-04 17:04 +1100
Re: Functional programming Rustom Mody <rustompmody@gmail.com> - 2014-03-03 22:20 -0800
Re: Functional programming Steven D'Aprano <steve@pearwood.info> - 2014-03-04 08:56 +0000
Re: Functional programming Antoon Pardon <antoon.pardon@rece.vub.ac.be> - 2014-03-04 11:56 +0100
Re: Functional programming Steven D'Aprano <steve+comp.lang.python@pearwood.info> - 2014-03-04 11:47 +0000
Re: Functional programming Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2014-03-05 00:01 +1100
OT Sine Rule [was Re: Functional programming] Steven D'Aprano <steve+comp.lang.python@pearwood.info> - 2014-03-04 14:25 +0000
Re: OT Sine Rule [was Re: Functional programming] Tim Chase <python.list@tim.thechases.com> - 2014-03-04 08:37 -0600
Re: OT Sine Rule [was Re: Functional programming] Mark Lawrence <breamoreboy@yahoo.co.uk> - 2014-03-04 14:42 +0000
Re: OT Sine Rule [was Re: Functional programming] Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2014-03-05 02:06 +1100
Re: OT Sine Rule [was Re: Functional programming] Tim Chase <python.list@tim.thechases.com> - 2014-03-04 09:21 -0600
Re: Functional programming Antoon Pardon <antoon.pardon@rece.vub.ac.be> - 2014-03-05 09:59 +0100
Re: Functional programming Marko Rauhamaa <marko@pacujo.net> - 2014-03-04 21:49 +0200
Re: Functional programming Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2014-03-05 07:01 +1100
Re: Functional programming Marko Rauhamaa <marko@pacujo.net> - 2014-03-04 22:50 +0200
Re: Functional programming Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2014-03-05 08:06 +1100
Re: Functional programming Marko Rauhamaa <marko@pacujo.net> - 2014-03-04 23:21 +0200
Re: Functional programming Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2014-03-05 08:26 +1100
Re: Functional programming Marko Rauhamaa <marko@pacujo.net> - 2014-03-04 23:43 +0200
Re: Functional programming Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2014-03-05 08:52 +1100
Re: Functional programming Gregory Ewing <greg.ewing@canterbury.ac.nz> - 2014-03-05 12:57 +1300
Re: Functional programming Marko Rauhamaa <marko@pacujo.net> - 2014-03-05 02:11 +0200
Re: Functional programming "BartC" <bc@freeuk.com> - 2014-03-04 13:30 +0000
Re: Functional programming Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2014-03-05 00:47 +1100
Re: Functional programming Mark Lawrence <breamoreboy@yahoo.co.uk> - 2014-03-04 14:05 +0000
Re: Functional programming Steven D'Aprano <steve+comp.lang.python@pearwood.info> - 2014-03-04 14:55 +0000
Re: Functional programming Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2014-03-05 02:13 +1100
Re: Functional programming MRAB <python@mrabarnett.plus.com> - 2014-03-04 17:07 +0000
Re: Functional programming Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2014-03-05 01:17 +1100
Re: Functional programming Steven D'Aprano <steve+comp.lang.python@pearwood.info> - 2014-03-04 15:18 +0000
Re: Functional programming Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2014-03-05 02:28 +1100
Re: Functional programming Steven D'Aprano <steve+comp.lang.python@pearwood.info> - 2014-03-04 15:45 +0000
Re: Functional programming Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2014-03-05 03:04 +1100
Re: Functional programming Antoon Pardon <antoon.pardon@rece.vub.ac.be> - 2014-03-05 10:09 +0100
Re: Functional programming "BartC" <bc@freeuk.com> - 2014-03-05 11:28 +0000
Re: Functional programming Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2014-03-05 23:04 +1100
Re: Functional programming Marko Rauhamaa <marko@pacujo.net> - 2014-03-05 14:11 +0200
Re: Functional programming Gregory Ewing <greg.ewing@canterbury.ac.nz> - 2014-03-04 11:06 +1300
Re: Functional programming Ben Finney <ben+python@benfinney.id.au> - 2014-03-04 09:31 +1100
Re: Functional programming Grant Edwards <invalid@invalid.invalid> - 2014-03-04 14:59 +0000
Re: Functional programming Steven D'Aprano <steve+comp.lang.python@pearwood.info> - 2014-03-04 15:22 +0000
Re: Functional programming Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2014-03-04 09:42 +1100
Re: Functional programming Ben Finney <ben+python@benfinney.id.au> - 2014-03-04 10:52 +1100
Re: Functional programming "BartC" <bc@freeuk.com> - 2014-03-04 09:41 +0000
Re: Functional programming 88888 Dihedral <dihedral88888@gmail.com> - 2014-03-03 16:35 -0800
csiph-web