Re: Lisp refactoring puzzle

Path	csiph.com!x330-a1.tempe.blueboxinc.net!usenet.pasdenom.info!news.albasani.net!fu-berlin.de!uni-berlin.de!individual.net!not-for-mail
From	Gregory Ewing <greg.ewing@canterbury.ac.nz>
Newsgroups	comp.lang.python
Subject	Re: Lisp refactoring puzzle
Date	Thu, 14 Jul 2011 15:12:41 +1200
Lines	13
Message-ID	<98755cFolU1@mid.individual.net> (permalink)
References	<19f8eb5b-cc90-472a-8399-4a5787b6fecf@glegroupsg2000goo.googlegroups.com> <c1749ae0-46ee-4ae6-a4e9-60eaebbc2a35@e18g2000vbx.googlegroups.com> <2c59f63a-b46f-4ea9-bc12-da4841687117@l28g2000yqc.googlegroups.com> <5cb297e4-6a39-461c-98c5-639e72e166af@p10g2000prf.googlegroups.com> <ivhtuo$dfd$1@dough.gmane.org> <87mxgilh15.fsf@mithlond.arda>
Mime-Version	1.0
Content-Type	text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding	7bit
X-Trace	individual.net ZKM6tTTNRs/l9uNgf1Y8Ug7dco29wkGu7MPS17EY/7QKaYdBlR
Cancel-Lock	sha1:j4T4mIYE/DFDRplIej5QkHZj7Oo=
User-Agent	Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.5 (Macintosh/20050711)
X-Accept-Language	en-us, en
In-Reply-To	<87mxgilh15.fsf@mithlond.arda>
Xref	x330-a1.tempe.blueboxinc.net comp.lang.python:9457

Show key headers only | View raw

Teemu Likonen wrote:

> Please don't forget that the whole point of Lisps' (f x) syntax is that
> code is also Lisp data.

It's possible to design other syntaxes that have a similar
property. Prolog, for example -- a Prolog program is expressed
in terms of Prolog data structures, yet it manages to have
things that look like fairly normal function calls and infix
expressions.

-- 
Greg

Back to comp.lang.python | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

Re: Lisp refactoring puzzle Xah Lee <xahlee@gmail.com> - 2011-07-11 20:37 -0700
  Re: Lisp refactoring puzzle jvt <vincent.toups@gmail.com> - 2011-07-12 07:30 -0700
  Re: Lisp refactoring puzzle "WJ" <w_a_x_man@yahoo.com> - 2011-07-12 15:27 +0000
  Re: Lisp refactoring puzzle fortunatus <daniel.eliason@excite.com> - 2011-07-12 09:16 -0700
  Re: Lisp refactoring puzzle gene heskett <gheskett@wdtv.com> - 2011-07-12 14:23 -0400
  Re: Lisp refactoring puzzle Petter Gustad <newsmailcomp6@gustad.com> - 2011-07-12 21:02 +0200
    Re: Lisp refactoring puzzle Neil Cerutti <neilc@norwich.edu> - 2011-07-12 19:44 +0000
      Re: Lisp refactoring puzzle "Pascal J. Bourguignon" <pjb@informatimago.com> - 2011-07-13 00:51 +0200
      Re: Lisp refactoring puzzle William Clifford <wobh@yahoo.com> - 2011-07-13 17:53 -0700
    Re: Lisp refactoring puzzle "WJ" <w_a_x_man@yahoo.com> - 2011-07-12 19:52 +0000
  Re: Lisp refactoring puzzle Gregory Ewing <greg.ewing@canterbury.ac.nz> - 2011-07-13 13:47 +1200
    Re: Lisp refactoring puzzle Roy Smith <roy@panix.com> - 2011-07-12 21:58 -0400
  Re: Lisp refactoring puzzle Terry Reedy <tjreedy@udel.edu> - 2011-07-13 00:39 -0400
    Re: Lisp refactoring puzzle rusi <rustompmody@gmail.com> - 2011-07-12 22:10 -0700
  Re: Lisp refactoring puzzle Teemu Likonen <tlikonen@iki.fi> - 2011-07-13 11:29 +0300
    Re: Lisp refactoring puzzle Terry Reedy <tjreedy@udel.edu> - 2011-07-13 10:34 -0400
      Re: Lisp refactoring puzzle Teemu Likonen <tlikonen@iki.fi> - 2011-07-13 18:25 +0300
    Re: Lisp refactoring puzzle Gregory Ewing <greg.ewing@canterbury.ac.nz> - 2011-07-14 15:12 +1200

csiph-web