Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.lang.python > #9354
| From | "Pascal J. Bourguignon" <pjb@informatimago.com> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | gnu.emacs.help, comp.emacs, comp.lang.lisp, comp.lang.python |
| Subject | Re: Lisp refactoring puzzle |
| Date | 2011-07-13 00:51 +0200 |
| Organization | Informatimago |
| Message-ID | <87aacji03c.fsf@kuiper.lan.informatimago.com> (permalink) |
| References | (1 earlier) <c1749ae0-46ee-4ae6-a4e9-60eaebbc2a35@e18g2000vbx.googlegroups.com> <2c59f63a-b46f-4ea9-bc12-da4841687117@l28g2000yqc.googlegroups.com> <5cb297e4-6a39-461c-98c5-639e72e166af@p10g2000prf.googlegroups.com> <87y603nwys.fsf@pangea.home.gustad.com> <983mh1Fs7cU1@mid.individual.net> |
Cross-posted to 4 groups.
Neil Cerutti <neilc@norwich.edu> writes:
> What's the rationale for providing them? Are the definitions
> obvious for collections that a not sets?
The rational is to prove that Xah is dumb.
--
__Pascal Bourguignon__ http://www.informatimago.com/
A bad day in () is better than a good day in {}.
Back to comp.lang.python | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Re: Lisp refactoring puzzle Xah Lee <xahlee@gmail.com> - 2011-07-11 20:37 -0700
Re: Lisp refactoring puzzle jvt <vincent.toups@gmail.com> - 2011-07-12 07:30 -0700
Re: Lisp refactoring puzzle "WJ" <w_a_x_man@yahoo.com> - 2011-07-12 15:27 +0000
Re: Lisp refactoring puzzle fortunatus <daniel.eliason@excite.com> - 2011-07-12 09:16 -0700
Re: Lisp refactoring puzzle gene heskett <gheskett@wdtv.com> - 2011-07-12 14:23 -0400
Re: Lisp refactoring puzzle Petter Gustad <newsmailcomp6@gustad.com> - 2011-07-12 21:02 +0200
Re: Lisp refactoring puzzle Neil Cerutti <neilc@norwich.edu> - 2011-07-12 19:44 +0000
Re: Lisp refactoring puzzle "Pascal J. Bourguignon" <pjb@informatimago.com> - 2011-07-13 00:51 +0200
Re: Lisp refactoring puzzle William Clifford <wobh@yahoo.com> - 2011-07-13 17:53 -0700
Re: Lisp refactoring puzzle "WJ" <w_a_x_man@yahoo.com> - 2011-07-12 19:52 +0000
Re: Lisp refactoring puzzle Gregory Ewing <greg.ewing@canterbury.ac.nz> - 2011-07-13 13:47 +1200
Re: Lisp refactoring puzzle Roy Smith <roy@panix.com> - 2011-07-12 21:58 -0400
Re: Lisp refactoring puzzle Terry Reedy <tjreedy@udel.edu> - 2011-07-13 00:39 -0400
Re: Lisp refactoring puzzle rusi <rustompmody@gmail.com> - 2011-07-12 22:10 -0700
Re: Lisp refactoring puzzle Teemu Likonen <tlikonen@iki.fi> - 2011-07-13 11:29 +0300
Re: Lisp refactoring puzzle Terry Reedy <tjreedy@udel.edu> - 2011-07-13 10:34 -0400
Re: Lisp refactoring puzzle Teemu Likonen <tlikonen@iki.fi> - 2011-07-13 18:25 +0300
Re: Lisp refactoring puzzle Gregory Ewing <greg.ewing@canterbury.ac.nz> - 2011-07-14 15:12 +1200
csiph-web